Abstract
As was noted in the introduction to the previous chapter, the allocation of some criminological theories to a discipline called ‘sociology’ and others to one called ‘psychology’ is bound to be to some extent arbitrary. Typically, criminologists have used a mix of sociological and psychological variables in developing their theories; even the most apparently sociological, such as cultural deviance theories, need to incorporate some account of the mental state of offenders if they are to be convincing. Similarly, few theories which are predominantly psychological claim that psychology can explain everything; more typically, they suggest that individual psychology can produce a predisposition to crime, which is activated in vulnerable individuals by social and economic circumstances. Thus the boundary between the two disciplines as applied to criminology is rarely clearcut — certainly it is less definite than some partisans of both psychology and sociology have claimed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1995 British Association of Social Workers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, D. (1995). The Uses of Psychology. In: Criminology for Social Work. Practical Social Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23901-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23901-6_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-58751-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23901-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)