Skip to main content

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

For most contemporary chroniclers the Norman Conquest was a quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom they knew nothing. Few noticed it: those that did sometimes got its date wrong. Hardly surprisingly, only Anglo-Saxon and Norman writers were concerned with events leading to Hastings, and its aftermath: their interpretations were inevitably coloured either by the despair of defeat or by the triumph of victory.1On one thing alone they were united: in assessing this trial by battle neither blamed the referee— God’s judgement was unquestioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Campbell, ‘Some Twelfth-Century Views of the Anglo-Saxon Past’, in Essays in Anglo-Saxon History (London, 1986), pp. 209–28; R. W. Southern, ‘Aspects of the European Tradition of Historical Writing, 4: the Sense of the Past’, TRHS, 5th series, 23 (1973), pp. 246–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. A. Loud, ‘The Gens Normannorum: Myth or Reality?’, ANS, 4 (1981), pp. 104–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See R. H. C. Davis, ‘William of Poitiers and his History of William the Conqueror’, in R. H. C. Davis and J. M. Wallace-Hadrill (eds), The Writing of History in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1981), pp. 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. H. C. Davis, ‘The Carmen de Hastingae Proelio’, EHR, 93 (1978), pp. 241–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. M. C. van Houts, ‘Latin Poetry and the Anglo-Norman Court, 1066–1135: the Carmen de Hastingae Proelio’, Journal of Medieval History, 15 (1989), pp. 39–62, with full bibliography.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See N. P. Brooks and H. E. Walker, ‘The Authority and Interpretation of the Bayeux Tapestry’, ANS, 1 (1977), pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Notably by C. R. Dodwell, ‘The Bayeux Tapestry and the French Secular Epic’, Burlington Magazine, 108 (1966), pp. 549–60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. E. J. Cowdrey, ‘Towards an Interpretation of the Bayeux Tapestry’, ANS, 10 (1987), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Short, ‘Patrons and Polyglots: French Literature in Twelfth-Century England’, ANS 14 (1991), pp. 229–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Brian Golding

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golding, B. (1994). The Sources. In: Conquest and Colonisation. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23648-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23648-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-42918-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23648-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics