Administering Electronics: The Experience of India and Brazil

  • Jørgen D. Pedersen
Part of the Policy Studies Organization Series book series (PSOS)

Abstract

The revolutionary changes implied by the ‘electronic revolution’ pose major challenges to countries in the Third World. On the one hand, the spread of new production methods in all fields of industry puts increasing pressure on already established industrial strongholds of the more advanced developing countries. The rapid changes and high ‘rate of obsolescence’ that characterize the new industrial technologies further intensify this pressure. On the other hand, the new technoeconomic paradigm underlying the new economic dynamism has shifted the strategic center of industry towards, in particular, the electronic industries, but also towards other R&D-intensive industries such as those producing new materials and biotechnology.

Keywords

Permeability Marketing Coherence Arena Argentina 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ADLER, EMANUEL (1986) ‘Ideological “guerrillas” and the quest for technological autonomy: Brazil’s domestic computer industry’, International Organization, vol. 40, no. 3 (summer), pp. 673–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ADLER, EMANUEL (1987) The Power of Ideology. The Quest for Technological Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  3. AGARWAL, SURAJ MAL (1985) ‘Electronics in India: Past Strategies and Future Possibilities’, World Development, vol. 13, no. 3 (March), pp. 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AGLIETTA, MICHEL (1979) A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. The US Experience (London: New Left Books).Google Scholar
  5. ALVES, MARIA HELENA MOREIRA (1988) State and Opposition in Military Brazil (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
  6. ASSIS, J. CARLOS DE (1984) Os Mandarins da República (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra).Google Scholar
  7. BHAMBRI, C.P. (1971) Bureaucracy and Politics in India (Delhi: Vikas Publications).Google Scholar
  8. BOSCHI, RENATO RAUL (1979) Elites Industriais e Democracia (Rio de Janeiro: Edicoes Graal).Google Scholar
  9. BOWONDER, B. and SUNIL MANI (1991) ‘Government Policy and Industrial Development: Case of Indian Computer Manufacturing Industry’, Economic and Political Weekly, 23 February, pp. M7–M11.Google Scholar
  10. BUREAU OF INDUSTRIAL COSTS AND PRICES (BICP) (1988) Report on Electronics (New Delhi: Government of India).Google Scholar
  11. DALAND, ROBERT T. (1967) Brazilian Planning. Development Politics and Administration (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
  12. DALAND, ROBERT T. (1981) Exploring Brazilian Bureaucracy: Performance and Pathology (Washington: University Press of America).Google Scholar
  13. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS (DoE) (1989) Annual Report 1988–89 (New Delhi: Government of India).Google Scholar
  14. DWIVEDI, O.P. and R.B. JAIN (1985) India’s Administrative State (New Delhi: Gitanjali).Google Scholar
  15. ERBER, FABIO STEFANO (1985) ‘The Development of the “Electronics Complex” and Government Policies in Brazil’, World Development, vol. 13, no. 3 (March), pp. 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EVANS, PETER B. (1986) ‘State, Capital, and the Transformation of Depedence: The Brazilian Computer Case’, World Development, vol. 14, no. 7 (July), pp. 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EVANS, PETER B. (1990) ‘Indian Informatics in the Eighties: The Changing Character of State Involvement’ (manuscript) University of California.Google Scholar
  18. EVANS, PETER B. and PAULO BASTOS TIGRE (1989a) ‘Paths to Participation in “Hi-Tech” Industry: A Comparative Analysis of Computers in Brazil and Korea’, Asian Perspectives, vol. 13, no. 1 (spring—summer), pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
  19. EVANS, PETER B. and PAULO BASTOS TIGRE (1989b) ‘Going Beyond Clones in Brazil and Korea: A Comparative Analysis of NIC Strategies in the Computer Industry’, World Development, vol. 17, no. 11 (November), pp. 1751–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GAZETA MERCANTIL (22 April 1991) ‘Cobra Strategy Switch Brings 1990 Profit of US$ 1.15M’ (obtained through Reuter’s ‘Textline’ database).Google Scholar
  21. GEDDES, BARBARA (1990) ‘Building “State” Autonomy in Brazil, 1930–1964’, Comparative Politics, vol. 22, no. 2 (January), pp. 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. GRAHAM, LAWRENCE A. (1968) Civil Service Reform in Brazil (Austin and London: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
  23. GRIECO, JOSEPH M. (1982) ‘Between dependency and autonomy: India’s experience with the international computer industry’, International Organization, vol. 36, no. 3 (summer), pp. 609–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. GRIECO, JOSEPH M. (1984) Between Dependency and Autonomy: India’s Experience with the International Computer Industry (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  25. HIRST, PAUL and JONATHAN ZEITLIN (1991) ‘Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications’, Economy and Society, vol. 20, no. 1 (February), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
  26. IDS BULLETIN (1984) ‘Developmental States in East Asia: capitalist and socialist’, vol. 15, no. 2 (April).Google Scholar
  27. INDIA TODAY (31 March 1988) ‘Computers: Thinking Big’, p. 77.Google Scholar
  28. INDIA TODAY (31 December 1989) ‘Computers: Price Friendly. Cheaper PCs Storm the Market’, p. 63.Google Scholar
  29. INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE (IHT) (10 July 1990) ‘Brazil Takes Aim at Computer Police’.Google Scholar
  30. JAIN, R.B. (1985) ‘Electronics Policy and Indian Parliament’, Indian Journal of Public Administration, vol. XXXI, no. 2 (April–June), pp. 239–74.Google Scholar
  31. JESSOP, BOB (1990a) State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place (Cambridge, Mass.: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  32. JESSOP, BOB (1990b) ‘Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect’, Economy and Society, vol. 19, no. 2 (May), pp. 153–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. KAPLINSKY, RAPHAEL (1989) ‘“Technological Revolution” and the International Division of Labour in Manufacturing: A Place for the Third World?’, European Journal of Development Research, vol. 1, no. 1 (June), pp. 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LAKHA, SALIM (1990) ‘Growth of Computer Software Industry in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 6 January, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
  35. LIPIETZ, ALAIN (1987) Mirages and Miracles: The Crisis of Global Fordism (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  36. MAHALINGAM, SUDHA (1989) ‘Computer Industry in India: Strategies for Late-Corner Entry’, Economic and Political Weekly, 21 October, pp. 2375–84.Google Scholar
  37. MATHEWS, JOHN (1989) Age of Democracy: The Politics of Post-Fordism (Melbourne: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  38. MENDES, CANDIDO (1980) ‘The Post-1964 Brazilian Regime: Outward Redemocratization and Inner Institutionalization’, Government and Opposition, vol. 15, no. 1 (Winter), pp. 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MEYER-STAMER, JÖRG (1988) Informatik in Brasilien (Hamburg: Institut für Iberoamerika-Kunde).Google Scholar
  40. MEYER-STAMER, JÖRG (1989) ‘Technologipolitischen Optionen für die brasilianische Informatikpolitik’ (manuscript) (Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.Google Scholar
  41. MISRA, B.B. (1986) Government Bureaucracy in India 1947–1976 (Delhi: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  42. PACKENHAM, ROBERT (1971) ‘The Functions of the Brazilian National Congress’, in Weston H. Agor (ed.), Latin American Legislatures: Their Role and Influence (New York: Praeger), pp. 259–92.Google Scholar
  43. PEREZ, CARLOTA (1985) ‘Microelectronics, Long Waves and World Structural Change: New Perspectives for Developing Countries’, World Development, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. PIORE, MICHAEL J. and CHARLES F. SABEL (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  45. POTTER, DAVID C. (1986) India’s Political Administrators 1919–1983 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  46. RAMAMURTI, RAVI (1987) State Owned Enterprises in High Technology Industries (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
  47. REPORT (1983) Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India Union Government (Commercial), 1982, Part V: Electronics Corporation of India Limited, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  48. REPORT (1990) ‘Report of the Study Team on Electronic Components for Eighth Five Year Plan for Electronics Industry’, Electronics — Information and Planning, May–June, pp. 307–31.Google Scholar
  49. ROETT, RIORDAN (1978) (2nd edn) Brazil: Politics in a Patrimonial Society (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
  50. SCHMITZ, HUBERT and TOM HEWITT (1989) ‘Learning to Raise Infants — A Case Study in Industrial Policy’ (manuscript), University of Sussex, Institute of Development Study.Google Scholar
  51. SCHWARTZMAN, SIMON (1988) ‘High Technology Versus Self-reliance: Brazil Enters the Computer Age’, in Julian M. Chacel, Pamela S. Falk and David V. Fleischer (eds), Brazil’s Economic and Political Future (Boulder, Col. and London: Westview Press), pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
  52. SKIDMORE, THOMAS (1973) ‘Politics and Economic Policy Making in Authoritarian Brazil, 1937–71’, in Alfred Stepan (ed.), Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future (New Haven and London: Yale University Press), pp. 3–46.Google Scholar
  53. STEPAN, ALFRED (1988) Rethinking Military Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  54. THERBORN, GÖRAN (1978) What Does the Ruling Class Do When it Rules? (London: New Left Books).Google Scholar
  55. TIGRE, PAULO BASTOS (1983) Technology and Competition in the Brazilian Computer Industry (London: Frances Pinter).Google Scholar
  56. UN/CTC (1983) Transborder Data Flows and Brazil (New York).Google Scholar
  57. WEBER, MAX (1978) Economy and Society, ed. by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Policy Studies Organization 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jørgen D. Pedersen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations