European integration: economic analysis and social reality

  • Willem Molle


In 1952, at the opening of the intergovernmental conference on the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community, Jean Monnet spoke the historic words: “Nous sommes là pour accomplir une oeuvre commune, non pour négocier des avantages mais pour rechercher notre avantage dans l’avantage commun”. In his view this common advantage was the safeguarding of peace through the mutual economic dependence of the members of a strong supranational institution. In practical policy-making the attention has shifted from common advantages to member-country advantages. This is only logical as the cohesion of the EC is based on a fair distribution of cost and benefits.


Foreign Direct Investment Social Cohesion European Integration Social Reality Economic Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balassa, B. (ed.) (1975), European Economic Integration, Amsterdam: North-Holland/American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. and R. Lyons (1991), “External economies and European integration: the potential for self-fulfilling expectations”, in The Economics of EMU, European Economy Special Edition 1, 56–75.Google Scholar
  3. BIPE (1992), Previsions glissantes détaillées: la France dans I’Europe de 1997, Paris: Synthèse.Google Scholar
  4. Buckley, P. J. and P. Artisien (1987), North-South Direct Investment in the European Communities, London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cecchini, P. et al. (1988), The European Challenge 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (1977), Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration (G. D. A. MacDougall et al.), Economy and Finance Series 1, General Report, Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. Commission of the European Communities (1983), The Europeans and their Regions, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities (1989), Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community (Delors Committee), Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities (1990), “One market, one money: an evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of forming an Economic and Monetary Union”, European Economy 44.Google Scholar
  10. Commission of the European Communities (1991a), “Fair competition in the internal market: Community state-aid policy”, European Economy 48, 7–114.Google Scholar
  11. Commission of the European Communities (1991b), Eurobarometer 35, June, Brussels.Google Scholar
  12. Commission of the European Communities (1992), Eurobarometer 38, December, Brussels.Google Scholar
  13. CEPR (1992), “Is bigger better? The economics of EC enlargement”, London.Google Scholar
  14. Emerson, M. et al. (1988), “The economics of 1992: an assessment of the potential economic effects of completing the internal market of the European Community”, European Economy 35/3, 5–222.Google Scholar
  15. European Coal and Steel Community (1953), Report on Problems raised by the Different Turnover Tax Systems applied within the Common Market (Tinbergen, J. et al.), Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  16. European Court of Justice (1985), Judgement of the Court in case 13/83, European Parliament vs. Council of the European Communities, 22 May.Google Scholar
  17. Gasiorek, M., A. Smith and A. Venables (1992), “1992, trade and welfare: a general equilibrium model”, paper for the CEPR Paris Conference, “Trade Policies and Trade Flows after 1992”.Google Scholar
  18. Grauwe, P. De et al. (1989), De Europese Monetaire Integratie: Vier Visies, Den Haag: WRR/V66.Google Scholar
  19. Haaland, J. and V. Norman (1992), “Global production effects of European integration”, paper for the CEPR Paris Conference.Google Scholar
  20. Márquez Méndez, A. J. (1986), Economic Integration and Growth in Europe, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  21. Márquez Méndez, A. J. (1990), “Economic cohesion in Europe: the impact of the Delors Plan”, Journal of Common Market Studies 29, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, M. H. and Spencer, J. E. (1977), “The static economic effects of the UK joining the EEC: a general equilibrium approach”, Review of Economic Studies 44, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molle, W. (1990), The Economics of European Integration: Theory, Practice, Policy, Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  24. Molle, W., J. de Koning and C. Zandvliet (1992), “Can foreign aid reduce East-West migration in Europe?”, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  25. Monnet, J. (1976), Mémoires, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  26. Owen, N. (1983), Economies of Scale, Competitiveness and Trade Patterns within the European Community, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Padoa-Schioppa, T. et al. (1987), Efficiency, Stability and Equity: A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pelktnans, J. (1986), Completing the Internal Market for Industrial Products, Brussels: Commission of the EC.Google Scholar
  29. Pelkmans, J. and A. Winters (1988), Europe’s Domestic Market (Chatham House Paper 43), London: Routledge for Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Petrochilos, G. A. (1989), Foreign Direct Investment and the Development Process, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, A. and Venables, A. J. (1988), “Completing the internal market in the EC: some industry simulations”, European Economic Review 32, 1501–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spaak, P.-H. et al. (1956), Rapport des Chefs de Délégation aux Ministres des Affaires Etrangères (Comité intergouvernemental créé par la Conference de Messine), Brussels.Google Scholar
  33. Triffin, R. (1992), “IMS: International Monetary System or Scandal?”, Florence: European Parliamentary Union/European University Institute, Jean Monnet Papers.Google Scholar
  34. Verdoorn, P. J. (1952), “Welke zijn de achtergronden en vooruitzichten van de economische integratie in Europa en welke gevolgen zou deze integratie hebben, met name voor de welvaart in Nederland?” Overdruk 22, Centraal Planbureau, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  35. Viaene, J.-M. (1982), “A customs union between Spain and the EEC”, European Economic Review 18, 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wegner, M. (1989), “The European Community” in Pechman, J. A. (ed.), The Role of the Economist in Government: An International Perspective, New York/London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf, 279–99.Google Scholar
  37. Werner, P. et al. (1970), “Report to the Council, Commission on the realisation by stages of economic and monetary union in the Community”, Bulletin of the EC 11, supplement.Google Scholar
  38. Whichart, O.G. (1981), “Trends in the US direct investment position abroad, 1950–1979”, US Department of Commerce Survey of Current Business 61.2, 39–56, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Centre for European Policy Studies 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem Molle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations