Skip to main content

Opposition: the Politics of Nostalgia

  • Chapter
  • 213 Accesses

Part of the book series: European Studies ((EUROSTUD))

Abstract

The Bonapartist régime claimed to have united France and healed the wounds of a decade of revolutionary discord. The seizure of power in Brumaire, it was argued, was justified by the need to restore order and effective government, and to prevent any further degeneration into factionalism. Bonaparte claimed that he stood above political factions, and popular sovereignty was in theory exercised directly through the First Consul, undivided and undiminished. Were these claims legitimate? The lack of any genuine political opposition during most of the Empire certainly makes it appear that order and reconciliation had been achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D.M.G. Sutherland, France, 1789–1815: Revolution and Counterrevolution (London: Fontana, 1985), p.390.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Tulard, Napoleon: Myth of the Saviour (London: Methuen, 1985), p.114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cited in Jacques Godechot, The Counter-revolution: Doctrine and Action, 1789–1804, trans. S. Attanasio (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972), p.364.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gwynne Lewis, The Second Vendée: The Continuity of Counterrevolution in the Department of the Card, 1789–1815 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), p.104.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jean Vidalenc, “L’Opposition sous le Consulat et l’Empire”, AhRf 60, 1968, 472–88 (see p.480).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henri Gaubert, Conspirateurs au temps de Napoléon Premier (Paris, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.C. Cobb, “Note sur la répression contre le personnel sansculotte de 1795 à 1801”, AhRf 134, 1954, p.28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raymonde Monnier, “De l’An III à l’An IX, les derniers sansculottes”, AhRf, 257, 1984, 386–406.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marcel Reinhard, Le Grand Carnot: vol.2, De Thermidor à l’Exil (Paris: Hachette, 1952), chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huntley Dupré, Two Brothers in the French Revolution: Robert and Thomas Lindet, (Hamden: Archon, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Georges Bouchard, Un Organisateur de la Victoire: Prieur de la Côte d’Or, membre du Comité du Salut Public (Paris, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leo Gershoy, Bertrand Barère: A Reluctant Terrorist (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raoul Girardet, “Les Trois Couleurs”, in P. Nora (ed.), Les Lieux de Mémoire, vol.1, (Paris: Gallimard, 1986) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simone Balayé, Madame de Staël: lumières et liberté (Paris: Klincksieck, 1979), chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghislain de Diesbach, Madame de Staël (Paris: Perrin, 1983), p.200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Martyn Lyons

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lyons, M. (1994). Opposition: the Politics of Nostalgia. In: Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. European Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23436-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23436-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-57291-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23436-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics