Skip to main content

Theatricality and the Corruption of the Modernist Work

  • Chapter
Postmodernism and Performance

Part of the book series: New Directions in Theatre

  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

In identifying the postmodern in art with a disruption of the move toward self-containment and self-sufficiency, one can readily set a ‘postmodern’ play with appropriated figures and forms against very different kinds of presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. C. Greenberg, ‘ “American-type” Painting’, in C. Greenberg, Art and Culture: Critical Essays ( Boston, Mass., 1965 ) p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Greenberg, ‘After Abstract Expressionism’, Art International vol. vi, no. 8 (1962) pp. 26–30, esp. p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Greenberg, ‘After Abstract Expressionism’, Art International vol. vi, no. 8 (1962) pp. 26–30, esp. p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Acconci, Recorded documentation by Vito Acconci of the exhibition and commission for San Diego State University, April-May 1982 (audio cassette) ( San Diego, Cal., 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Fried, ‘Art and Objecthood’, in G. Battcock (ed.), Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology (New York, 1968 ) p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Alloway, ‘Rauschenberg’s Development’, in Smithsonian Institute, Robert Rauschenberg ( Washington, D.C., 1976 ) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Crichton, Jasper Johns (London, 1977) p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Kaprow, Assemblages, Environments and Happenings (New York, 1966 ) p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Reuben Gallery, George Brecht: toward Events announcement of exhibition (New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, J. Cage, ‘An Interview’, Tulane Drama Review, vol. x, no. 2 (1965) pp. 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kaprow, ‘Self-Service: a Happening’, Drama Review vol. XII, no. 3 (1968) pp. 160–4, esp. pp. 161–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Kostalanetz, The Theatre of Mixed Means (New York, 1968) p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Kaprow, ‘Education of the Un-artist, Part Two’, Art News vol. LXXI, no. 3 (1972) pp. 34–9, 62, esp. p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kaprow and R. Schechner, ‘Extensions in Time and Space’, Drama Review vol. XII, no. 2 (1968) pp. 153–9, esp. p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kaprow, ‘The Happenings are Dead: Long Live the Happenings’, Artforum vol. Iv, no. 7 (1966) pp. 36–9, esp. p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kaprow, ‘Non-theatrical Performance’, Artforum vol. xiv, no. 9 (1976) pp. 45–51, esp. pp. 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Van der Marck, ‘George Brecht: an Art of Multiple Implications’, Art in America vol. LXII, no. 4 (1974) pp. 48–57, esp. p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Nick Kaye

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaye, N. (1994). Theatricality and the Corruption of the Modernist Work. In: Postmodernism and Performance. New Directions in Theatre. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23334-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics