Advertisement

Theoretical perspectives

  • Frances Gray
Chapter
Part of the Women in Society book series

Abstract

Some readers may have a sense of déjà vu as they examine this section. When I began this book I imagined discovering, guiltily, how out-of-date my knowledge of comic theory is, that complex and passionate debates by critics of both sexes about the relationship between laughter and gender were so well established that even non-specialists could point me towards the relevant texts. It wasn’t like that. I did find exciting work by women which dealt with specific comic practitioners — generally literary practitioners — and offered insights into comic theory on the way. But when it came to discussing and defining ‘humour’, there seemed to be very little that was new. The students I talked to who were doing courses on ‘comedy’ seemed to be reading texts which grounded themselves in the same assumptions about gender as those I read as an undergraduate twenty-five years ago; which means that to attend a course on ‘comedy’ in an academic environment is still to learn a vocabulary that serves to reassert the idea of female humourlessness. Perhaps I should not have been surprised. Regina Barreca suggests that ‘feminist criticism has generally avoided the discussion of comedy, perhaps in order to be accepted by conservative critics who found feminist theory comic in and of itself’.1 Barreca’s own 1988 volume, by combining jokes, analysis and comic theory, thus created a significant milestone in political as well as in cultural terms.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R. Barreca, Last Laughs: Perspectives on Women and Comedy (Gordon & Breach: 1988) p. 4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michael Godkewitsch, The Relationship Between Arousal Potential and the Funniness of Jokes, in J. Goldstein and P. McGhee, The Psychology of Humour (Academic Press: 1972) p. 150.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Suls, Cognitive Process in Humor Appreciation, in P. McGhee and J. Goldstein, (eds), Handbook of Humor Research, Vol. I (Springer-Verlag: 1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Chapman, J. Smith and H. Foot, Humor, Laughter and Social Interaction, in P. McGhee and A. Chapman (eds), Children’s Humor (Wiley & Sons: 1980) p. 166 (my italics).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    John Strickland, The Effect of Motivation Arousal on Humor Preferences’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, 1959, pp. 278–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Young and M. Frye, ‘Some Are Laughing, Some Are Not — Why?’, Psychological Reports, Vol. 18, 1966, pp. 747–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. M. Davis and A. Farina, ‘Humour Appreciation as Social Communication’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1970, pp. 175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Wilson and A. H. Brazendale, ‘Sexual Attractiveness and Response to Risque Humour’, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 3, 1973, p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Wilson and A. H. Brazendale, ‘Vital Statistics: Perceived Sexual Attractiveness and Response to Risque Humour’, Journal of Social Psychology, 95, 1975, pp. 201–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Wilson, The Psychology of Performing Arts (Croom Helm: 1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Chapman and C. Gadfield, ‘Is Sexual Humour Sexist?’, Journal of Communication, Summer 1976, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Zillman and J. Cantor, ‘A Disposition Theory of Humour and Mirth’, in A. Chapman (ed.), Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Application (Wiley, 1976) p. 167.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Cantor, ‘What is Funny to Whom?’, Journal of Communication, Summer 1975, p. 164–70.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aristotle, Poetics, translated by T. S. Dorsch, Classical Literary Criticism (Penguin: 1965) p. 37.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    T. Hobbes, On Human Nature, in W. Molesworth (ed.), The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, Vol. IV (Bohn: 1840) p. 46.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    A. Koestler, Act of Creation (Danube: 1960).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    K. Lorenz, On Aggression (Bantam: 1967) p. 253.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    See John Sweeney, ‘Buttons Unbuttoned’, The Independent Magazine, 17 Dec. 1988, p. 40.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Ben Jonson, Timber; or, Discoveries Made Upon Men and Matter, in C. H. Hereford and P. and E. Simpson (eds), Works, Vol. VIII (QUP: 1947) p. 643.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Philip Sidney, Apologie for Poetry, in D. J. Enright and E. de Chickera English Critical Texts (OUP: 1962) p. 43.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Northrop Frye, The Argument of Comedy (English Institute Essays: 1949) p. 63.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Immanuel Kant, Critique on Judgement, translated by J. H. Bernard (Macmillan: 1914).Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    Herbert Spencer, On the Physiology of Laughter: Essays on Education and Kindred Subjects (Dent: 1911).Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    Sigmund Freud, Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious, translated by Strachy (Penguin: 1976) p. 189.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    F. Cornford, The Origin of Attic Comedy (CUP: 1934) p. 3.Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    Rosalind Miles, The Woman’s History of the World (Paladin, 1990) p. 53.Google Scholar
  27. 33.
    M. Bakhtin, Introduction to Rabelais and His World, translated by H. Iwolsky (MIT Press: 1971) p. 9.Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    A. Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Idea, translated by R. B. Haldane and J. Kemp, Vol. II (RKP: 1886) p. 279.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    S. A. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, in J. R, Morreall (ed.), The Philosophy of Laughter and Humour (State University of New York Press: 1986) p. 83.Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    M. Douglas, Jokes, Implicit Meanings (Routledge & Kegan Paul: 1975) p. 98.Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    A. Zijderveld, ‘Jokes and their Relation to Social Reality’, Social Research, Vol. 35, 1968, p. 302.Google Scholar
  32. 39.
    Sarah Daniels, Masterpieces (Methuen: 1984).Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    Estelle Philips, ‘On Becoming A Mother-in-law’, Abstracts of the British Psychological Society: 1991.Google Scholar
  34. 42.
    Norma J. Gravely, ‘Sexist Humour As a Form of Social Control — or, Unfortunately — the Joke is Usually On Us’, in R. Winegarten (ed.), Selections on the Status of Women in American Society (University of Texas Press: 1978).Google Scholar
  35. 44.
    Julia Kristeva, About Chinese Women, translated by H. Ranous (Boyars: 1977) p. 28–9.Google Scholar
  36. 45.
    Mary Daly, Beyond God the Father (Beacon Press: 1985) p. xxv.Google Scholar
  37. 47.
    Hélène Cixous, The Laugh of the Medusa, in E. Marks and T. de Courtivron (trs and eds), New French Feminisms (Harvester: 1981) p. 249.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Frances Gray 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances Gray

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations