Rapid Policy Interventions
Rapid poverty alleviation has great political attractions. True, in the longterm, we are all dead, but some of us may not even survive the short term. Politicians live in the short term. It could also be argued that in so far as there is a long term, it consists of a series of short terms. About one-third of the poor are temporarily poor, so that intervention on their behalf has an important impact on poverty reduction. These facts point to the conclusion that concern for the short term is not only politically but also intellectually respectable.
KeywordsFood Stamp Public Provision User Charge Private Provision Indicator Target
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Edirisinghe, N. 1987. The food stamp scheme in Sri Lanka: Costs, benefits and Options for modification. Washington DC. International Food Policy Research Institute, Research Report 58, March.Google Scholar
- Lipton, M., n.d. Draft introduction to a book on poverty research, mimeo.Google Scholar
- Lipton, M., van der Gaag, J. 1982. ‘Poverty: A research and policy framework’, in Howes, M.; Greeley, M. (eds), Rural technology, rural institutions and the rural poorest, Dhaka, CIRDAP/IDS.Google Scholar
- Nelson, J. 1989. ‘The politics of pro-poor adjustment’ in Fragile coalitions: The politics of economic adjustment, ed. Joan M. Nelson and contributors, US Third World Policy Perspectives No. 12, New Brunswick and Oxford, Overseas Development Council, Transaction Books, pp. 106–107.Google Scholar
- Taylor, L.; Horton, S.; Raff. D. 1980. Food subsidy programs: A survey, Report prepared for the Ford Foundation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, quoted in de Janvry, A.; Sadoulet, E. Efficiency, welfare effects and political feasibility of alternative antipoverty and adjustment programs, mimeo.Google Scholar