Skip to main content

Witkiewicz and the Theatre of Death

  • Chapter
Twentieth-Century European Drama

Part of the book series: Insights ((ISI))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Such a critical reception for a first play frequently guarantees the playwright instant box-office success and automatic elevation into the canon. But the production of Tumor Brainiowicz at the Slowacki Theatre in Krakow in June 1921 was no breakthrough for Stanislaw Ignacy Witkiewicz (Witkacy, 1885–1939), playwright, painter, critic, aesthetician, novelist, philosopher and writer on drugs, whom his American translator and biographer, Daniel Gerould, has described as ‘one of the most amazing artistic geniuses and personalities of the modern period’.2

‘It seems that we are watching and hearing the ravings of a syphilitic in the last stages of creeping paralysis. …Witkiewicz’s play is a total absurdity from which nothing can ever arise. It is an unnatural clinical abortion. It should be put in alcohol and studied by psychopathologists.’1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quoted in ‘Theatre Checklist No. 6’, compiled by Daniel Gerould, Theatrefacts, vol. 2, no. 2, 1975, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Introduction to Stanislaw Witkiewicz, The Madman and the Nun and Other Plays, trans, and ed. by Daniel Gerould and C. S. Durer (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1968) p. xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Three plays from this collection, with the Introduction, and Foreword by Jan Kott, have been reprinted as The Madman and the Nun and The Crazy Locomotive (including The Water Hen) (New York: Applause Theater Book Publishers, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konstanty Puzyna, ‘Witkacy in the Polish Theatre’ (paper delivered at the ITI Witkiewicz Centenary Symposium, Warsaw, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin Esslin, ‘The Search for a Metaphysical Dimension in Drama’, introduction to Tropical Madness (New York: Winter House, 1972) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janusz Degler, ‘Witkiewicz on the Polish Stage, 1921–1984’, The Theatre in Poland, no. 10–12 (1984) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ‘The Writings of Tadeusz Kantor, 1956–1985’, trans. Michael Kobialka, Drama Review, vol. 30, no. 3 (Fall 1986) pp. 125, 136, 155, 169.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stanislaw Witkiewicz, ‘A Refutation of Anatol Stern’s Objections’ (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  9. quoted in Janusz Degler, ‘Witkacy’s Theory of Theatre’, Dialectics and Humanism (Polish Scientific Publishers) vol. XII, no. 2 (Spring 1985) p. 85

    Google Scholar 

  10. From the last section of Stanislaw Witkiewicz, ‘An Introduction to the Theory of Pure Form in the Theatre’, Skamander, nos 1, 2 and 3 (1920) trans, in Gerould and Durer, op. cit., pp. 293, 295–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allardyce Nicoli, World Drama (London: Harrap, 1949) p. 621.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manfred Pfister, The Theory and Analysis of Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) p. 129.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniel Gerould, introduction to Doubles, Demons and Dreamers (New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1985) pp. 13, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Antonin Artaud in 1923, in a preface to Maeterlinck’s ‘Twelve Songs’

    Google Scholar 

  15. quoted in Eric Sellin, The Dramatic Concepts of Antonin Artaud (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antonin Artaud, The Theatre and its Double (New York: Grove Press, 1958) pp. 46, 77, 94, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jean Genet, Reflections on the Theatre (London: Faber, 1972) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. A. C. Dobrez, The Existential and its Exits: Literary and Philosophical Perspectives on the Works of Beckett, Ionesco, Genet and Pinter (London: Athlone Press, 1986) pp. 265–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Michael Green (ed.), The Russian Symbolist Theatre (Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1986) p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Theodor Adorno, Aesthetic Theory (London: Routledge, 1984) p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clive Hart, Language and Structure in Beckett’s Plays (Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe, 1986) pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henrik Ibsen, Letters and Speeches, ed. Evert Sprinchorn (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1965) p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Christine Kiebuzinska, Revolutionaries in the Theater: Mayerhold, Brecht and Witkiewicz (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1988) pp. 112, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stanislaw Witkiewicz, ‘A Few Words about the Role of the Actor in the Theatre of Pure Form’, trans. Daniel Gerould, Theatre Quarterly, vol. V, no. 18 (1975) pp. 94–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Victor H. Miesel (ed.), Voices of German Expressionism (London: Prentice-Hall, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dorothy Pam, ‘Kokoschka’s “Murderer, the Woman’s Hope”’, Drama Review, vol. 19, no. 3 (September 1975) pp. 5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. M. Ritchie and H. F. Garten, Seven Expressionist Plays (London: Calder, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  28. See also, Konstanty Puzyna, ‘The Genius of Witkacy’, Gambit, vol. 9, nos 33–4 (1979) pp. 60–1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Biographia Literaria (London: J. M. Dent, 1906) ch. XIV, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boris Eichenbaum, ‘The Theory of the Formal Method’, quoting Victor Shklovsky, Russian Formalist Criticism, trans. Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965) p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Umberto Eco, A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976) p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jan Kott, ‘Witkiewicz and Artaud: Where the Analogy Ends’, Theatre Quarterly, vol. V, no. 18 (1975) p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Janusz Degler, ‘Witkacy in Poland: Finding a Style for “The Mother”’, Theatre Quarterly, vol. V, no. 18 (1975) pp. 74–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. In Stanislaw Witkiewicz, The Beelzebub Sonata: Plays, Essays and Documents, ed. and trans. Daniel Gerould and Jadwiga Kosicka (New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  35. For an analysis of Witkiewicz’s techniques in dramatising Wahazar’s violent monomania, see James W. Parker, ‘Witkiewics’s “Gyubal Wahazar” and Riebout-Dessaigne’s “L’Empereur de Chine”’, Polish Review, vol. XVIII, nos 1–2 (1973) pp. 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Daniel Gerould, Witkacy: Stanislaw Ignacy Witkiewicz as an Imaginative Writer (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1981) p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Czeslawa Korzeniowska, quoted in ‘Theatre Checklist No. 6’, Theatrefacts, vol. 2, no. 2 (1975) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1994 The Editorial Board, Lumière Cooperative Press Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howard, R. (1994). Witkiewicz and the Theatre of Death. In: Docherty, B. (eds) Twentieth-Century European Drama. Insights. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23073-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics