Skip to main content

Gender Inequality and Economic Development

  • Chapter
Economics in a Changing World

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Inequality between men and women has been associated with economic backwardness. Although the causes of gender inequality were disputed, in the 1950s and 1960s, it was widely held that forces unleashed in economic development would lead to a convergence in the status and well-being of men and women.1 For example, modernization theorists argued that increasing reliance on impersonal markets to allocate economic resources was incompatible with discrimination. Moreover structural changes, associated with development, such as the increasing relative importance of manufacturing and at a later stage the rapid growth of the service sector, were thought to facilitate women’s involvement in production and therefore to increase their economic value. In turn women’s economic usefulness was seen as a key determinant of their relative status and well-being.2 But current research has questioned the spontaneity of links between the level of development and women’s relative status. Behind this retreat from easy generalizations has been an accumulation of evidence suggesting significant differences in the extent, pattern and terms of women’s involvement in paid work in countries at similar levels of development. If the comparative static fit between gender roles and economic structure looks less than tidy,the implication is that there may be only a weak correspondence between women’s relative well-being and economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allèn, T. (1992) ‘Economic Development and the Feminisation of Poverty’ in Folbre, N. et al. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Economics Volume 4: Women’s Work in the World Economy (London: Macmillan) pp. 107–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anchor, R. and Hein, C. (1985) ‘Why Third World Urban Employers Usually Prefer Men’, International Labour Review, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, K. (1984) Land, Labour and Rural Poverty: Essays in Development Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, B. (1987) ‘The Task of a Feminist Economics: A More Equitable Future’, in Farnham, C. (ed.) The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berik, G. and Çagatay, N. (1992) ‘Industrialisation Strategies and Gender Composition of Manufacturing Employment in Turkey’, in Folbre, N. et al. (eds), Issues in Contemporary Economics Volume 4: Women’s Work in the World Economy (London: Macmillan) pp. 41–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. and Villa, P. (1992) ‘Is There a Mediterranean Path to Female Integration into the Labour Market?’, paper presented at the International Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation Conference, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R.O. and Wolfe, D.M. (1960) Husbands and Wives (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970) Woman’s Role in Economic Development (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A. and Glover, J. (1990) An Analysis of Women’s Employment Patterns in the UK, France and the USA: The Value of Survey-Based Comparisons, Research Paper No. 75, Department of Employment, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and Weale, M. (1992) ‘On Measuring the Quality of Life’, World Development, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 119–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, M.G. and Starzec, C. (1992) ‘Women and Part-time work: France and Great Britain Compared’, in Folbre, N. et al. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Economics, Volume 4: Women’s Work in the World Economy (London: Macmillan) pp. 180–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dex, S. and Shaw, L. (1988) ‘Women’s Working Lives: A Comparison of Women in the United States and Great Britain’, in Hunt, A. (ed.) Women and Paid Work (London: Macmillan) pp. 173–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. and Pearson, R. (1981) ‘The Subordination of Women and the Internationalization of Factory Production’, in Young K. et al. (eds) Of Marriage and the Market (London: Conference of Socialist Economists) pp. 144–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. and Fine, K. (1974) ‘Social Choice and Individual Rankings, I and II’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44, nos 3 and 4, pp. 303–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. and Hartmann, H. (1988) ‘The Rhetoric of Self-Interest: Ideology and Gender in Economic Theory’ in Klamer, A. et al. (eds) Consequences of Economic Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 184–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E. (1984) ‘The Provision and Quality of Part-time Work: The Case of Great Britain and France’, Report to the Equal Opportunities Office of the European Community, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W.J. (1963) World Revolution and Family Patterns (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. and Markowitz, H. (1952) ‘Social Welfare Functions based on Individual Ranking’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 58, November, pp. 257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, C. (1984) ‘Jobs for the Girls: Export Manufacturing in Mauritius’, International Labour Review, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 251–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. (1985) ‘Gender, Pay and Skill: Manual Workers in Brazilian Industry’, in Afshar, H. (ed.) Women, Work and Ideology in the Third World (London: Tavistock) pp. 214–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (1991) Yearbook of Labour Statistics (Geneva: International Labour Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J., Hagen, E. and Reddy, C. (eds) (1988) Feminisation of the Labour Force (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joekes, S. (1985) ‘Working for a Lipstick? Male and Female Labour in the Clothing Industry in Morocco’, in Afshar, H. (ed.) Women, Work and Ideology in the Third World (London: Tavistock) pp. 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koistinen, P. and Ostner, I. (eds) (1992) ‘Women in the Markets: Learning of the Differences in the Finnish and German Labour Markets’, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, G. (1989) ‘Gender, Differential Mortality and Development: A Perspective on the Experience of Kerala’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 517–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynch, J. and Sen, A. (1983) ‘Indian Women: Well-being and Survival’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 363–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. (1983) ‘Capitalism, Imperialism and Patriarchy: The Dilemma of Third World Women Workers in Multinational Factories’, in Nash, J. and Fernandez-Kelly, M.P. (eds) Women, Men and the International Division of Labour (Albany: State University of New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulders, D., Plasmar, R. and Vander Stricht, V. (1991) ‘Position of Women on the Labour Market: Developments between 1983 and 1989–90’, Report to the Commission of the European Community, Department of Applied Economics, Free University of Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. (1981) The Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1983) ‘The Impact of Changing International Division of Labour on Different Sectors of the Labour Force’, in Nash, J. and Fernandez-Kelly, M.P. (eds) Women, Men and the International Division of Labour (Albany: State University of New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J. (1989) Money and Marriage (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, B. (1992) ‘Socio-cultural Differences and the Labour Market Behaviour of Women in European Countries: The Example of Germany and Finland’, paper presented at the International Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation Conference, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R.A. (1985) ‘A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 23, June, pp. 581–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Crisis Committee (1988) ‘Country Rankings of the Status of Women: Poor, Powerless and Pregnant’, Briefing Paper No. 20, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. (1976) Mortality Patterns in National Populations (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, I. and Ratcliffe, P. (1992) ‘Employment and Domestic Work: A Comparison of Samples of British and French Women’, in Arber, S. and Gilbert, N. (eds) Women and Working Lives: Divisions and Change (London: Macmillan) pp. 71–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J. (ed.) (1988) Women and Recession (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Safa, H. (1981) ‘Runaway Shops and Female Employment: The Search for Cheap Labour’, Signs, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 418–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.H. (1973) ‘Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate’, Econometrica, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1027–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1988) ‘Women and Capitalism: Oppression or Emancipation? A Review Article’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 30, pp. 534–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, L. and Scott, J. (1978) Women, Work and Family (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (annual) State of the World’s Children (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, P. and Dex, S. (1992) ‘Feminisation of the Labour Force in Britain and France’, in Arber, S. and Gilbert, N. (eds) Women and Working Lives: Divisions and Change (London: Macmillan) pp. 89–103.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1991) World Development Report 1991 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G.A., Rose, A.K., Yellen, J.L. and Hessenius, H. (1991) ‘East Germany in from the Cold: The Economic Aftermath of Currency Union’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1, pp. 1–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and Cowell, F. (1992) ‘Measurement of Income Inequality. Experimental Test by Questionnaire’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 47, pp. 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D. (1991) Privatization: A Theoretical Treatment (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D. (1992) ‘Privatization in East Germany’, International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D. and Tillmann, G. (1989a) Equitability and Income Taxation’, in Bös, D. and Felderer, B. (eds) The Political Economy of Progressive Taxation (Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer) pp. 75–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D. and Tillmann, G. (1989b) ‘An Economist’s View of Equitable Taxation’, in Bös, D. and Felderer (eds) The Political Economy of Progressive Taxation (Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer) pp. 107–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A. and Mirrlees, J.A. (1971) ‘Optimal Taxation and Public Production, Part I: Production Efficiency’, American Economic Review, vol. 61, pp. 8–27; ‘Part II: Tax Rules’, American Economic Review, vol. 61, pp. 261–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1989) ‘A Political Philosopher’s View of Equitable Taxation’, in Bös, D. and Felderer, B. (eds) The Political Economy of Progressive Taxation (Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer) pp. 101–5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J.A. (1971) ‘An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 38, pp. 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recktenwald, H.C. and Grüske, K.-D. (1980) ‘Justitia Distributiva durch Umverteilung. Eine Analyse der personellen Budgetinzidenz’ (Distributive Justice by Redistribution. An Analysis of the Personal Incidence of the Budget), Kyklos, vol. 33, pp. 16–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R.K. (1983) ‘How Much Redistribution is possible through Commodity Taxes?’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 20, pp. 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Humphries, J. (1993). Gender Inequality and Economic Development. In: Bös, D. (eds) Economics in a Changing World. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22988-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics