Skip to main content

Public Enterprises and Industrial Policies

  • Chapter
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

1.1 — The obverse of the theme, or the effects of industrial policies on Italian public enterprises, will not be dealt with here. My theme will be narrowed down — apart from a few generalizations — to the study of the role of industrial enterprises whose shares are owned by the State (1) as instruments of industrial policy. It is the presence of these firms that underscores the uniqueness of the Italian system, not that of public enterprises: though the effects on industry of the latter are clearly evident, they are usually created to achieve a purpose related to the specific goods and servicies they produce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Market failure is more a series of exceptions than a theoretical category. Only the “disequilibrium” school of thought generalizes this concept (see Fitoussi J.P.: Modern Macroeconomic Theory, an Overview, Oxford, Oxford Blackwell, 1983), based on the assumption that markets exist which are incapable of exausting supply or of satisfying potential demand. When Hicks (in Capital and Growth) subdivides flex- and fixed-price sectors (markets), the presence of market failure is implied. Since this leads to the creation of a macroeconomic disequilibrium, macroeconomic disequilibrium policies may well be justified. Nowadays, however, it is difficult to distinguish between such policies and simple pragmatism.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a recent survey. see Aronica A.: «La privatizzazione delle PP. SS.» in Dr. Mayo A. (ed.): Le politiche di privatizzazione in Italia, Bologna. il Mulino. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pages 85–98 of the Bank Of Italy: Annual Report (May 1990) clearly illustrate the slowdown in Italian small businesses during the eighties.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Leon P.: «L’impresa sovietica e la perestroika» in Note di ricerca Cles, no. 2, March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 SIPI Srl, Rivista di Politica Economica

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leon, P. (1993). Public Enterprises and Industrial Policies. In: Baldassarri, M. (eds) Industrial Policy in Italy, 1945–90. Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22985-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics