Vico’s Intellectual Development

  • Cecilia Miller
Part of the Studies in Modern History book series (SMH)


Virtually all recent work on Vico is based on the premise that there was an epistemological break in his thought in 1710, at which point he became suddenly and dramatically anti-Cartesian.1 One reason for this is that most previous studies have restricted themselves to an analysis of the third and final version of Vico’s best known work, La scienza nuova (1744). Little effort has been made to trace the development of his ideas not only in the important first (1725) and almost unknown second (1730) editions of La scienza nuova, but also throughout his autobiographical and earlier theoretical writings. The exception to this practice is the attention given to De antiquissima italorum sapientia, the publication of which in 1710 is held to mark his supposed intellectual conversion. Quite to the contrary, however, it can be argued that no such major shift in his thought occurred at any point. Yet this is not to deny Vico’s anti-Cartesian stance. The year 1710 was not a dramatic turning point in Vico’s intellectual development; rather, it was the year that he wrote the first of his works which was to receive significant attention.


Historical Knowledge Historical Reconstruction French Philosopher Past Culture Past Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. G. Vico, De mente heroica, in F. Nicolini (ed.), Scritti Vari e Pagine Sparse(Ban: Laterza, 1940). Google Scholar
  2. Donald Davidson, ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, XLVII (1973–1974) 5–20.Google Scholar
  3. Terry Eagleton, The Ideology of the Aesthetic(Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990). Google Scholar
  4. G. Vico, De antiquissima italorum sapientia (1710) in Le orazioni inaugurali, Il de italorum sapientia, e le polemiche, G. Gentile and F. Nicolini (eds) (Ban: Laterza, 1914), in G. B. Vico: Opere, I, 1. Google Scholar
  5. E. P. Noether, Seeds of Italian Nationalism, 1700–1815 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951) pp. 48–62, esp. Google Scholar
  6. Giambattista Vico, Opere, F. Nicolini (ed.) (1953) p. 310Google Scholar
  7. H. P. Adams, The Life and Writings of Giambattista Vico (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1935). Google Scholar
  8. G. Costa, ‘An Enduring Venetian Accomplishment: The Autobiography of G. B. Vico’, Italian Quarterly, 21, No. 79 (1980) 46–47. Google Scholar
  9. G. Vico, ‘Vita di Giambattista Vico scritta da smedesimo’, Raccolta d’opuscoli scientifici e filologici (Venice: 1728) pp. 145–256. Google Scholar
  10. B. Croce and F. Nicolini, Bibliografia Vichiana (Naples: Riccardo Ricciardi, 1947–1948) I, p. 194.Google Scholar
  11. P. Giannone, Dell’ Istoria civile del Regno di Napoli (Naples: Niccola Naso, 1723).Google Scholar
  12. H. Acton, The Bourbons of Naples 1734–1825 (London: Metheun, 1956), ch. 7. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cecilia Miller 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Wesleyan UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations