Skip to main content

On Efficiency of Spatial Oligopoly

  • Chapter
Does Economic Space Matter?
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

M. L. Greenhut has been claiming for many years now that economic space inherently involves oligopolistic relationships among firms. In turn, he has maintained that contrary to conventional economic thought, oligopolistic competition can yield a long-run equilibrium that is unique, want-satisfying, and efficiently stable; in fact, he claims it contains features isomorphic to those of perfect competition. This is a surprising argument which has to this time drawn insufficient attention from the professional circle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, P. W. S. (1964) On Competition in Economic Theory ( London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1935) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, vol. 6, pp. 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont, C., J. Gabszewicz and J.-F. Thisse (1979) ‘On Hotelling’s Stability in Competition’, Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 1145–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1959) ‘The Nature of Equilibrium in Monopolistic Competition’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, pp. 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1972) ‘The Inconsistencies in Monopolistic Competition; A Reply’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 80, pp. 592–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palma, A., V. Ginsburg, Y. Papageorgiou and J.-F. Thisse (1985) ‘The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds Under Sufficient Heterogeneity’, Econometrica, vol. 53, pp. 767–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward, N. (1981) ‘Impacts of Distance on Microeconomic Theory: A Critique’, Manchester School, vol. 49, pp. 245–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. (1986) ‘Nash Equilibrium in Duopoly with Products Defined by Two Characteristics’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 17, pp. 431–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, C. A. (1971) ‘Fundamental Properties of Loschian Spatial Demand’, Environment and Planning, vol. 3, pp. 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. (1963) Microeconomics and the Space Economy (Chicago: Scott, Foresman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. (1970) A Theory of the Firm in Economic Space (New York: Appleton Century). 2nd printing, 1974 ( Austin, Tex.: Lone Star Publishers ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. (1975) ‘A Theoretical Mapping from Perfect Competition to Imperfect Competition’, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 42, pp. 177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. (1978) ‘Impacts of Distance on Microeconomic Theory’, Manchester School, vol. 46, pp. 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. and W. J. Lane (1989) ‘A Theory of Oligopolistic Competition’, Manchester School, vol. 57, pp. 248–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. and H. Ohta (1975) Theory of Spatial Pricing and Market Areas ( Durham, NC: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. and H. Ohta (1976) ‘Related Market Conditions and Interindustrial Mergers’, American Economic Review, vol. 66, pp. 267–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. and H. Ohta (1979) ‘Vertical Integration of Successive Oligopolists’, American Economic Review, vol. 69, pp. 137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L., M. Hwang and H. Ohta (1975) ‘Observations on the Shape and Relevance of the Spatial Demand Function’, Econometrica, vol. 43, pp. 669–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L., G. Norman and C.-S. Hung (1987) The Economics of Imperfect Competition ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisprud, G. (1974) ‘A Note on the Theory of Oligopoly: Comments to a Model Presented by Greenhut’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 110, pp. 511–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurzynski, Z. S. (1966) ‘A Review Article on Microeconomics and the Space Economy’, South African Journal of Economics, vol. 34, pp. 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929) ‘Stability in Competition’, Economic Journal, vol. 39, pp. 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1972) ‘The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics’, Economic Journal, vol. 82, pp. 1237–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921) Risk Uncertainty and Profit ( Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, A.. (1954) The Economics of Location, trans. by W. Stoper ( New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, S. E. (1985) ‘The Excess Capacity Controversy: A Critique of Recent Criticism’, Economic Inquiry, vol. 24, pp. 265–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics ( London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, H. (1976) ‘On Efficiency of Production under Conditions of Imperfect Competition’ Southern Economic Journal, vol. 43, pp. 1124–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, H. (1977) ‘On the Excess Capacity Controversy’, Economic Inquiry, vol. 15, pp. 153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, H. (1980) ‘Spatial Competition, Concentration and Welfare’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 10, pp. 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, H. (1981) ‘The Price Effects of Spatial Competition’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 48, pp. 317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithies, A. (1941) ‘Monopolistic Price Policy in a Spatial Market’, Econometrica, vol. 9, pp. 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M. (1973) ‘A Review Article on a Theory of the Firm in Economic Space’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 109, pp. 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 Hiroshi Ohta and Jacques-François Thisse

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenhut, J.G., Ohta, H. (1993). On Efficiency of Spatial Oligopoly. In: Ohta, H., Thisse, JF. (eds) Does Economic Space Matter?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22906-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics