Abstract
For over three decades now historians of technology have been exploring the dynamics of technological change. Unravelling the paths by which new technologies are discovered and implemented has proved to be an intellectually engaging enterprise that has largely sustained the discipline. Much of the fascination with the process of technological change results from its complexity. On the other hand, this complexity has discouraged the development of more general approaches to the subject. Lacking explicit alternatives, most historians of technology have fallen back upon a linear model of technological change which links invention, development and commercialization in a sequential progression. Because the last two steps depend on the first one (invention), it is invention that has received the most scrutiny by historians. In fact, the concept of invention is tightly bound up with the linear model. Below it will be argued that the use of the linear model has distorted our understanding of technological change and that an alternative model, a Darwinian evolutionary one, more accurately expresses the complexity that emerges from the narrative histories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitken, Hugh G. (1985) The Continuous Wave: Technology and American Radio, 1900–1932 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Basalla, George (1989) The Evolution of Technology (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Callon, Michel (1987) ‘Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Social Analysis’, in Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor Pinch (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Chandler, Alfred D., Jr (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press).
Friedel, Robert (1983) Pioneer Plastic: The Making and Selling of Celluloid (Madison, Wis.: University of Wiscons in Press).
Friedel, Robert (1986) ‘Silver From Clay’, American Heritage of Invention and Technology, 1, 3 (Spring).
Hounshell, David A. and Smith, John Kenly, Jr (1988) Science and Corporate Strategy, Du Pont R&D 1902–1980 (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Hughes, Thomas P. (1989) American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technolo-gical Enthusiasm (New York: Viking).
Jewkes, John, Sawyers, David and Sillerman, Richard (1958) The Sources of Invention (New York: St Martin’s Press).
Kroeber, Alfred L. (1923) Anthropology (New York: Harcourt Brace).
McMillan, Frank M. (1979) The Chain Straighteners (London: Macmillan).
Millard, Andre (1990) Edison and the Business of Innovation (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Mueller, Willard (1962) ‘The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying Du Pont’s Major Product and Process Innovations, 1920–1950’, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Noble, David F. (1977) America By Design (Oxford University Press).
Noble, David F. (1989) ‘Automation Madness or the Unautomatic History of Automation’, in Steven L. Goldman (ed.), Science, Technology, and Social Progress, Research in Technology Studies, vol. 2 (Bethlehem, Pa: Lehigh University Press).
Pacey, Arnold (1976) The Maze of Ingenuity: Ideas and Idealism in the Development of Technology (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Reich, Leonard S. (1985) The Making of American Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926 (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Smith, Cyril Stanley (1976) ‘On Art, Invention, and Technology’, Technology Review, 78 (June).
Smith, George David (1988) From Monopoly to Competition: The Transformation of Alcoa (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Smith, John Kenly (1990) ‘The Scientific Tradition in American Industrial Research’, Technology and Culture, 31, 1.
Staudenmaier, John M. (1985) Technology’s Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Ross Thomson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, J.K. (1993). Thinking about Technological Change: Linear and Evolutionary Models. In: Thomson, R. (eds) Learning and Technological Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22855-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22855-3_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22857-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22855-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)