Czechoslovakia in 1968: Climax and Defeat of Reform Communism
The attempt made to reform the communist system from above in Czechoslovakia was more far-reaching, and had a better prospect of success, than anywhere else in Eastern Europe either before or since. In order to explain the depth of the movement towards change within the party itself, one must bear in mind that Czechoslovakia had hardly undertaken any de-Stalinising reforms at all in the late 1950s. The thorough and dramatic character of the changes of the Dubček era resulted from their belatedness.
KeywordsAction Programme Communist Party Central Committee Party Leader Soviet Leader
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.See an interview given by Smrkovský shortly before his death, quoted in H. G. Skilling, Czechoslovakia’s Interrupted Revolution, (Princeton, 1976), p. 879.Google Scholar
- 7.Z. Mlynář, Night Frost in Prague, (London, 1980), p. 97.Google Scholar
- 10.An English translation (without the section on science) is printed in R. A. Remington, ed., Winter in Prague, (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969) pp. 88–137.Google Scholar
- 11.In Práce, (Prague) 11 April 1968, printed in translation in P. Tigrid, Le Printemps de Prague, (Paris, 1968), pp. 217–20.Google Scholar
- 15.A. Oxley, A. Pravda and A. Ritchie (eds), Czechoslovakia, The Party and the People, (London, 1973), p. 170; Batt, op. cit., p. 197.Google Scholar
- 27.G. Golan, Reform Rule in Czechoslovakia, (Cambridge, 1973), p. 142.Google Scholar
- 30.P. Tigrid, La chute irrésistible ďAlexandre Dubček, (Paris, 1970), p. 88.Google Scholar
- 37.As quoted in J. Skála, Vom Prager Friihling zur Charta 77, (Berlin, 1978), p. 61.Google Scholar
- 38.J. Kavan, ‘From the Prague Spring to a Long Winter’, in J. Pehe (ed.), The Prague Spring, (London, 1988), p. 109.Google Scholar
- 42.V. V. Kusin, From Dubček to Charter 77, (Edinburgh, 1978), p. 85.Google Scholar
- 43.M. Šimečka, The Restoration of Order, (London, 1984), chs 3 and 4.Google Scholar
- 46.Quoted in B. Kagarlitsky, The Thinking Reed, (London, 1988), p. 201.Google Scholar