Skip to main content

Making History: the Plays of Howard Brenton

  • Chapter
British and Irish Drama since 1960

Abstract

Since the performance of his first play, Ladder of Fools, at Cambridge University in 1965, Howard Brenton has written more than fifty dramatic works - a truly prodigious output for someone his age.1 Like most major contemporary British dramatists, Brenton began his theatrical life in the ‘fringe’, with such shoestring companies as Brighton Combination and Portable Theatre. His career, then, is very much a post-1960 phenomenon; it could not really have existed (not, at any rate, in the form it has taken) before the proliferation in England of fringe theatre in the sixties. Brenton’s approach to drama was simply too far removed from that of ‘traditional’ West End theatre; only in the fringe could he find the sort of ‘laboratory’ in which to explore new concepts of theatrical writing: socially and politically active, aggressively experimental. The fringe thus provided Brenton with a ‘poor’ theatre that was for him paradoxically rich, a theatre whose very poverty nurtured him. His early play Gum and Goo (1969), for example, was created ‘with what was to hand - three actors, a few days, a budget of thirty shillings for a ball and three bicycle lamps’.2 Eventually, however, the confines of the fringe proved more constraining than liberating: while he has never completely abandoned his dramatic roots, his work since the mid-seventies has been written progressively for large mainstream theatres like the National and the Royal Shakespeare Company. This attempt to infiltrate the mainstream with values developed in the fringe was regarded by Brenton as a kind of guerilla action, an ‘armoured charabanc . . . parked’ within the very heart of the Establishment.3 ‘I’d rather have my plays presented to 900 people who may hate what I’m saying’, he commented in 1979, ‘than to fifty of the converted’.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a complete list to 1988 of the plays of Howard Brenton (b. 1942) see Contemporary Dramatists, ed. D.L. Kirkpatrick (London: St James Press, 1988). Since Contemporary Dramatists Brenton has published Greenland (1988), H.I.D. (Hess Is Dead) (1989), A Sky Blue Life, How Beautiful with Badges, Measure for Measure (1989; all three plays predate 1989, but none was previously published), Iranian Nights (1989; co-written with Tariq Ali), The Wall-Dog (1990; English version of Manfred Karge’s Der Mauerhund, from a translation by Jane Brenton) and Moscow Gold (1990; co-written with Tariq Ali).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howard Brenton, ‘Author’s Note’ for Gum and Goo, in Plays for the Poor Theatre (London: Methuen, 1980) p. 56. Note Brenton’s title for this collection of early fringe plays.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howard Brenton, quoted by Sheridan Morley in ‘The Man Behind the Lyttelton’s First New Play’, The Times (London), 10 July 1976, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Howard Brenton, quoted by Malcolm Hay and Philip Roberts in ‘Howard Brenton: an Introduction’, Performing Arts Journal, 3, 3 (Winter 1979) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Howard Brenton, interviewed by Catherine Itzin and Simon Trussler in ‘Petrol Bombs Through the Proscenium Arch’, Theatre Quarterly, 5, 17 (March-May 1975) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. In addition to ‘resurrecting’ the ghosts of history in his drama, Brenton has also written many plays featuring contemporary public figures - sometimes identified explicitly (Margaret Thatcher, for example [the play in which she appears, A Short Sharp Shock! (1980), co-written with Tony Howard, was originally titled Ditch the Bitch], or Gorbachev in Moscow Gold (1990), co-written with Tariq Ali) but more often alluded to implicitly. Thus critics have found barely disguised portraits of recent public figures in such Brenton works as Fruit (1970); Measure for Measure (1972); Pravda (1985), co-written with David Hare; Greenland (1988); and Iranian Nights (1989), co-written with Tariq Ali. Brenton has also written a number of plays specifically about famous writers (Gorky in A Sky Blue Life [1966; rev. 1971]; Byron and Shelley in Bloody Poetry [1984]); for the purposes of this essay, however, I am excluding writers from the category of ‘historical figures’.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Howard Brenton, in Malcolm Hay and Philip Roberts, ‘Interview: Howard Brenton’, Performing Arts Journal, 3, 3 (Winter 1979) 136, 138.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Howard Brenton, ‘Preface’, Brenton Plays: One (London: Methuen, 1986) pp. ix-x.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howard Brenton, interviewed by Tony Mitchell in ‘The Red Theatre under the Bed’, New Theatre Quarterly, 3,11 (August 1987) 196.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael X. Zelenak, ‘The Politics of History: Howard Brenton’s Adaptations’, Theater (Yale), 18, 1 (Fall/Winter 1986) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howard Brenton, quoted by Peter Ansorge in ‘Underground Explorations No.1: Portable Playwrights’, Plays and Players, 19, 5 (February 1972) 16. The central situationist text is Guy Debord, La Société du Spectacle (Paris: Buchet-Chastel, 1967); an English translation, The Society of the Spectacle, was published in 1970 by the Black and Red Printing Cooperative, Detroit. For an excellent summary of the situationist position, see Richard Boon, Brenton the Playwright (London: Methuen, 1991) pp. 54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ‘Petrol Bombs’, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Magnificence, in Brenton Plays: One, pp. 95–6. A similar recipe for ‘disrupting the spectacle’ is offered by the ghost of Emily Davison, the suffragist who threw herself in front of the King’s horse at the 1913 Derby, in Epsom Downs (1977): ‘England at peace on Derby day. It is just a picture, thin as paint. Slash it. . . . See the dirty wall behind’. Epsom Downs, in Brenton Plays: One, p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard Brenton, quoted by Jonathan Hammond in ‘Messages First: an Interview with Howard Brenton’, Gambit, 6, 23 (1973) 26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Churchill Play, in Brenton Plays: One, p. 111. All further page references will be cited in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Christie in Love,in Brenton Plays: One, p. 12. All further page references will be cited in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ‘Author’s Production Note’ for Christie in Love, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Howard Brenton, Hitler Dances (London: Methuen, 1982) p. 33. All further page references will be cited in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Max Stafford-Clark, quoted by Peter Ansorge in ‘Underground Explorations No. 4: War Games’, Plays and Players, 19, 8 (May 1972) 16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ‘Petrol Bombs’, p. 15; my emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  23. John Bull, New British Political Dramatists (London: Macmillan, 1984) p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weapons of Happiness, in Brenton Plays: One, p. 180. All further page references will be cited in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  25. ‘The Red Theatre’, p. 200. The ghost of Stalin also makes a brief appearance in Thirteenth Night - the answer to, and thus the judgment on, Jack Beaty’s attempt to justify his crimes for the sake of a ‘larger goal’, the establishment of a truly socialist government in England: ‘“So what does it matter, what does it matter? If good comes of it, the dead are forgotten. A century on and all will be well. All manner of things”. The figure of STALIN walks through the shadows’. Thirteenth Night, in Brenton Plays: Two (London: Methuen, 1989) p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Howard Brenton, ‘Preface’, Brenton Plays: Two, p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid. Brenton is referring here specifically to Thirteenth Night, but again the sentiment applies equally to Weapons of Happiness.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See ‘The Red Theatre’, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  30. As Philip Roberts notes: ‘It would not have worked so powerfully if the object of the rape had been a woman and thus a confirmation for the audience that the received wisdom of how armies act does not need further exploration’. See Roberts’‘Howani Brenton’s Romans’, Critical Quarterly, 23, 3 (Autumn 1981) 17. The rape scene caused an enormous uproar in England. Mary Whitehouse, of the National Viewers’ and Listeners’ Association, took legal action against the play’s director, Michael Bogdanov, under the 1956 Sexual Offences Act: Bogdanov was charged with having procured an act of gross indecency. The case came to trial in March 1982, but after three days in court the prosecution’s charge was withdrawn.

    Google Scholar 

  31. The Romans in Britain, in Brenton Plays: Two, pp. 34–5. All further page references will be cited in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boon, p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Romans in Britain was not the first Brenton play to attack imperialism through the deconstruction of historical figures. In Scott of the Antarctic (significantly subtitled or What God Didn’t See) Scott’s expedition is ‘haunted’ by a character who ‘slunk through the action, always on the edge of spots . . . , a kind of anti-Scott’, thus constantly subverting the myth of Scott’s ‘heroism’ (‘Author’s Note’, Plays for Public Places [London: Methuen, 1972] p. 9). ‘Scott was not on the ice to get to the pole . . .’, Brenton has commented. ‘He was there because of his public school, his C of E religion and the British Empire’ (‘Underground Explorations No.1: Portable Playwrights’, p. 16).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Howard Brenton, ‘Author’s Note’, H.I.D. (Hess Is Dead) (London: Nick Hern,1989) p. i.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H.I.D. (Hess Is Dead) p. 11. All further page references will be cited in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  36. In H.I.D., Nicole, one of the academics/media experts charged with establishing the ‘official line’ on Hess’s death, uses the metaphor of ‘cooking’ to acknowledge this manipulation and betrayal of history: ‘To remove impurities. To add artificial sweeteners. . . . Why was cooking invented? As a measure against the near poison of everything we eat. . . . So cook the news. Reality is salmonella’ (51–2).

    Google Scholar 

  37. ‘Petrol Bombs’, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Howard Brenton,‘Haiku for Margaretta D’Arcy on Her Rubbishing of My Play’, New Statesman, 14 September 1979; cited in File on Brenton, ed. Tony Mitchell (London: Methuen, 1987) p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  39. ‘Underground Explorations No.1: Portable Playwrights’ p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sir Peter Hall, Pester Hall’s Diaries: the Story of a Dramatic Battle, ed. John Goodwin (New York: Harper & Row, 1984) p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeifman, H. (1993). Making History: the Plays of Howard Brenton. In: Acheson, J. (eds) British and Irish Drama since 1960. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22762-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics