Advertisement

Associative Patterns in Created and Adapted Groups

  • Tom Douglas
Chapter

Abstract

Why do we need others? Essentially, we need them for the rewards they can offer us and the costs they can help us avoid; we also need others for the information they can provide about our world and about ourselves. (Raven and Rubin, 1976, p. 41)

It seems likely that affiliative social bonds have survival value for groups and that innate affiliative patterns of behaviour have evolved. Relations between members of a group can be seen as an equilibrium between aggression and affiliative processes: the affiliative processes hold the aggressive ones in check. (Argyle, 1970, p. 31)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyle, M. (1970) Social Interaction (London, Methuen).Google Scholar
  2. Bruno, F. J. (1957) Trends in Social Work 1874–1956 (New York, Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright, D. and A. Zander (1953) Group Dynamics: Research and Theory (London, Tavistock).Google Scholar
  4. Collins, B. E. and H. Guetzkow (1964) A Social Psychology of Group Processes for Decision-making (New York, John Wiley).Google Scholar
  5. Gordon, T. (1972) ‘A description of the Group Centred Leader’, in R. C. Diedrich and H. A. Dye (eds), Group Procedures; Purposes, Processes and Outcomes (Boston, Houghton Mifflin) pp. 71–101.Google Scholar
  6. Haskell, R. E. (1975) ‘The Presumptions of Groupwork: a value analysis’, Small Group Behavior, 6(4) (London, Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  7. Janis, I. L. (1972) Victims of Groupthink: a psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes (Boston, Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
  8. Katz, D. and R. L. Kahn (1969) ‘Common Characteristics of Open Systems’, in F. E. Emery (ed.), Systems Thinking (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
  9. Lang, N. C. (1972) ‘A Broad-range Model of Practice in the Social Work Group’, Social Service Review, 46(1) pp. 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lang, N. C. (1973) ‘The Selection of the Small Group for Service Delivery: An exploration of the literature on group use in social work’, Social Work with Groups, 1(3) (New York, Haworth Press) pp. 247–63.Google Scholar
  11. Northen, H. (1987) ‘Selection of Groups as the Preferred Modality of Practice’, in J. Lassner, K. Powell and E. Finnegan (eds), Social Group-work: Competence and Values in Practice (New York, Haworth Press).Google Scholar
  12. Raven, B. H. and J. Z. Rubin (1976) Social Psychology: People in Groups (New York, John Wiley).Google Scholar
  13. Rosenthal, W. A. (1970) ‘A Theory of Beginnings in Social Group Work Process’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania School of Social Work, April.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, D. (1978) ‘Dyadic Encounter: The Foundation of Dialogue and the Group Process’, Small Group Behavior, 9(2) (London, Sage Publications) pp. 287–304.Google Scholar
  15. Toffler, A. (1970) Future Shock (London, Pan).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tom Douglas 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Douglas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations