Abstract
Commentators who have considered the role of the writer in television drama have tended to start either from notions of authorship and creativity, or from the organisation of production. The first approach stresses the writers’ relative autonomy and their pre-eminent role in shaping the final text. In this version they are assimilated to the romantic stereotype of the artist ‘working alone to carve a personal vision out of the marble of his sensibility’.1 Organisationally-oriented approaches, on the other hand, present writers as relatively powerless and enmeshed in a web of ideological and economic pressures which curtail their choices and channel their work in certain directions. In these accounts they appear as craftsmen rather than creators, professionals on a par with journalists and copy-writers, working within well-understood constraints to turn saleable ideas into shootable scripts. The text is no longer the unique expression of the author’s sensibilities, but a collective product manufactured by an industrial process and subject to the insistent pressures of time, resources and market competition.
Screen Education, no. 35, Summer 1980.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Richard Corliss, Talking Pictures: Screenwriters in the American Cinema, New York: Penguin Books, 1975, p. xvii.
See, for example, Manuel Alvarado and Edward Buscombe Hazell: The Making of a TV Series, London: British Film Institute/Latimer, 1978, and
Muriel Cantor, Prime-Time Television: Content and Control, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980.
Shaun Sutton, ‘The New Television Drama Writers’, EBU Review, vol. XXX, November, 1979, p. 14.
Roderick M. Graham, ‘Coming to Terms with Video for Location Drama’, Television: Journal of the Royal Television Society, vol. 18, no. 3, May/June, 1980, p. 15.
Gaye Tuchman, ‘Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 77, January 1972, pp. 660–79.
See Peter Burke, Tradition and Innovation in Renaissance Italy, London: Fontana, 1974, p. 71.
Karl Marx, Theories of Surplus Value: Part One, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1969, p. 401.
Karl Marx, ‘Debates on Freedom of the Press’, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works: Volume One, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1975, p. 174.
I have borrowed this distinction from Herbert Gans, Popular Culture and High Culture, New York: Basic Books, 1974, p. 62.
See Lewis A. Coser, Men of Ideas: A Sociologist’s View, New York: The Free Press, 1979, p. 46.
For a classic statement of this point, see Pierre Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978, Chapter 11.
John Sturrock, ‘Roland Barthes’, in John Sturrock (ed.), Structuralism and Since, London: Oxford University Press, 1979, p. 67.
Roland Barthes, ‘The Death of the Author’, in Music-Image-Text, London: Fontana, 1977, p. 143.
See Raymond Williams, ‘The Writer: Commitment and Alignment’, Marxism Today, vol. 24, no. 6, June 1980, p. 25.
This phrase is taken from Bernard Sharratt, ‘The Politics of the Popular — From Melodrama to Television’, in David Bradby et al. (eds), Performance and Politics in Popular Drama, London: Cambridge University Press, 1980, p. 275.
See Phillip Drummond, ‘Television Drama: Discursivity and Determination in Hazell’, Paper presented to the BFI Television Seminar, March 1980.
Colin McArthur, Television and History, London: BFI, 1978, p. 40
Terry Eagleton, Criticism and Ideology, London: Verso, 1978, pp. 58–60.
See Catherine Itzin, ‘Production Casebook No 6: Upstairs, Downstairs’, Theatre Quarterly, vol. 11, June 1972, p. 29.
See Alfred Shaughnessy’s autobiography, Both Ends of the Candle, London: Peter Owen, 1978.
Interview with Melvyn Bragg, South Bank Show, London Weekend Television, 24 February 1980.
Quoted in Mairède Thomas, ‘A Play for Today: An Interview with Roland Joffe’, in Truth The First Casualty: The British Media and Ireland, London: Information on Ireland, 1979, p. 12.
For documentation, see Colin R. Munrow, Television, Censorship and The Law, Farnborough: Saxon House, 1979, pp. 155–160 and W. Stephen Gilbert, ‘An Angle on Solid Geometry’, Broadcast, no. 1049, 17 March 1980, pp. 12–16.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1993 Graham Murdock
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murdock, G. (1993). Authorship and Organisation. In: Alvarado, M., Buscombe, E., Collins, R. (eds) The Screen Education Reader. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22426-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22426-5_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-54126-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22426-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)