Abstract
It may be helpful to begin with a definition of a central term and an explanation of the structure of this article. I use ‘avant-garde’ to refer to that body of work which engages with questions of film language and the relationship of film-maker and spectator to film, but which is also produced in opposition to the dominant system of production, distribution and exhibition and is therefore part of independent cinema. This is a limited and debateable usage, but my argument here is that the changes in conditions of production implied by the practice of independent cinema are important to the activity of thinking through the social practice of the avant-garde. These notes are part of a process of reflection upon three years’ experience of teaching avant-garde and independent cinema to mixed groups of adults on the British Film Institute (BFI) University of London Extra-Mural course in Film Studies from 1976 to 1979. In one sense they are ‘thoughts after the event’, the rationalisation of a process of testing and transforming positions on ‘the avant-garde’ and ‘teaching’ which were not clearly formulated in the first place. This is an opportunity to hesitate, to reassess that work and its underlying assumptions in the light of certain historical changes over the past five years or so which make reassessment important.
Screen Education, no. 32/33, Autumn/Winter 1979/80.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Peter Wollen, ‘The Two Avant-Gardes’, in Avant Garde Film in England and Europe, Studio International, November–December 1975.
See Alan Lovell and Jim Hillier, Studies in Documentary, London: BFI/Secker & Warburg, 1972, pp. 21–2 and 29–30.
Peter Wollen, Signs and Meanings in the Cinema, (rev. edn), London: BFI/Secker & Warburg, 1972.
The Editors of Cahiers du cinéma, ‘John Ford’s Young Mr. Lincoln’, Screen, vol. 13, no. 3, Autumn 1972, reprinted in J. Ellis (ed.) Screen Reader, vol. 1, London: Society for Edcuation in Film and Television, 1977.
Nöel Burch, Theory of Film Practice, London: Secker & Warburg, 1973.
See, for example, the Edinburgh Film Festival publications on Douglas Sirk (Laura Mulvey and John Halliday, eds, 1972);
Frank Tashlin (Claire Johnston and Paul Willemen, eds, 1973);
Raoul Walsh (Phil Hardy, ed. 1974);
Jacques Tourneur (Johnston and Willemen, eds, 1975).
Also J. Halliday (ed.) Sirk on Sirk, London: BFI/Secker & Warburg, 1971.
P. Adams Sitney, ‘The Films of Michael Snow’, in Annette Michelson (ed.) New Forms in Film Montreux: Lausanne Museum of Art, 1974.
Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, ‘A Note on History/Discourse’, Edinburgh ’76 Magazine, Edinburgh Film Festival, 1976, p. 27.
See Rod Stoneman (ed.) Independent Film Workshops in Britain, Torquay, Devon; Grael Communications, 1979.
Rosalind Coward and John Ellis, Language and Materialism, London: RKP, 1977, p. 149.
See Paul Willemen (ed.) Ophuls, London: BFI, 1978.
For an elaboration of these questions see Simon Field, Stan Brakhage: An American Independent Film-Maker, London: Arts Council of Great Britain, 1979; Laura Mulvey, ‘Feminism, Film and the Avant-Garde Film’ Framework, no. 10, Spring 1979;
Pam Cook, ‘The Point of Expression in Avant-Garde Film’, in E. Cowie (ed.) British Film Institute Production Board Catalogue, 1977–78, London: BFI 1978.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1993 Pam Cook
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, P. (1993). Teaching Avant-Garde Film: Notes Towards Practice. In: Alvarado, M., Buscombe, E., Collins, R. (eds) The Screen Education Reader. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22426-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22426-5_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-54126-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22426-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)