Abstract
In 1844 Belinsky wrote in article six of the famous cycle ‘Articles on Pushkin’ in regard to ‘Ruslan and Liudmila’:
there isn’t anything Russian in it, apart from the names … there isn’t a glimmer of Romanticism in it either … Pushkin’s poem should have been a triumph for the Pseudo-Classicist party [that is, the adherents of Classicism] of that time. … the so-called Classicists of that time should have celebrated the appearance of ‘Ruslan and Liudmila’as their victory over the then so-called Romanticists.1
More than a hundred years later, one of the most brilliant and authoritative Pushkinists of our time, Tomashevsky, remarked: ‘Pushkin’s poem does not have a long genealogy, although the history of comic poems offers very many different examples of the genre … It must be decisively said that “Ruslan and Liudmila” was a poem addressed not to the past, but to the future’.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 International Council for Soviet and East European Studies, and Derek Offord
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Altshuller, M. (1992). Pushkin’s ‘Ruslan and Liudmila’ and the Traditions of the Mock-Epic Poem. In: Offord, D. (eds) The Golden Age of Russian Literature and Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22310-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22310-7_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22312-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22310-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)