Abstract
Marxist literary criticism has a relatively long history but it is only comparatively recently that it has become widely accepted that Marxism should be seen as at the centre of critical discussion and debate. Earlier Marxist criticism — so-called ‘vulgar’ Marxism — tended to be viewed by those uncommitted to Marxist politics as reductive, since literary texts were interpreted in reflective terms as being directly determined by socio-economic forces, and though a critic such as Georg Lukács was widely respected and could not be dismissed as a vulgar Marxist, his work was mainly influential within the Marxist tradition. Contemporary Marxism has questioned traditional dogma and has been prepared to enter into engagement with developments in modern theory. Thus what Jacques Derrida has termed a more ‘open Marxism’ has emerged.1
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Jonathan Dollimore, Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Brighton, 1984).
Terry Eagleton, Myths of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontës (London, 1975).
Stephen Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Energy in Renaissance England (Oxford, 1988).
Peter Hulme, Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492–1797 (London, 1986).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1992 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newton, K.M. (1992). Politics and History. In: Newton, K.M. (eds) Theory into Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22244-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22244-5_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-56768-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22244-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)