Skip to main content

Manuscript Studies: New Directions for Appreciating Middle English Romance

  • Chapter
From Medieval to Medievalism

Part of the book series: Insights

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

Recent years have seen a marked increase in scholarly attention to Middle English (ME) romance manuscripts and their relevance to our literary-critical and historical-critical appreciation of the romances which they contain. The effect of much of this attention has been codicological, that is, concerned with the study of manuscripts as wholes, rather than merely with particular items in their contents or some one aspect of their make-up, such as script or watermarks. Thus the sometimes disparate approaches of textual scholarship and literary criticism concerning ME romance have had more exchange, and there now exists a considerable body of scholarly literature which combines the two approaches, or closely bears on their combination. Surprisingly, there is no analytical survey of these studies yet in print. As a result, those interested in investigating the subject need themselves to expend some effort in assembling a working bibliography. My essay is meant to facilitate this process by providing an overview of recent work on the subject. I shall deal first with conceptual background for the field and some other foundational material, then with three influential scholars for the combination of romance manuscript studies with literary criticism, and finally with examples of the two predominant directions of recent studies to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. B. Parkes, in J. J. G. Alexander and M. T. Gibson (eds), Medieval Learning and Literature: Essays Presented to R. W. Hunt (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976) pp. 115–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On this and related material, see also A. I. Doyle and M. B. Parkes, ‘The Production of Copies of the Canterbury Tales and the Confessio Amantis in the Early Fifteenth Century’, in M. B. Parkes and Andrew G. Watson (eds), Medieval Scribes, Manuscripts and Libraries: Essays Presented to N. R. Ker (London: Scolar Press, 1978) pp. 163–210

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Minnis, Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages (London: Scolar Press, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Judson Boyce Allen, The Ethical Poetic of the Later Middle Ages: A Decorum of Convenient Distinction (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. One useful introduction to paleographical terminology and kinds of medieval script is in Anthony G. Petti, English Literary Hands from Chaucer to Dryden (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977) pp. 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, John J. Thompson, ‘The Compiler in Action: Robert Thorton and the “Thornton Romances” in Lincoln Cathedral MS 91’, in Derek Pearsall (ed.), Manuscripts and Readers in Fifteenth-Century England: The Literary Implications of Manuscript Study (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, Biblio, 1983) pp. 113–24, where he infers the processes by which Thornton as ‘compiler’ brought about the final form of his ‘romance unit’ (p. 114, emphasis added) which includes nine romances and additional items.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Thornton Manuscript (Lincoln Cathedral MS 91), intro. D. S. Brewer and A. E. B. Owen (1975; rpt. with revised intro., London: Scolar Press, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Auchinleck Manuscript: National Library of Scotland Advocates’ MS 19.2.1, intro. Derek Pearsall and I. C. Cunningham (London: Scolar Press in assoc. with the National Library of Scotland, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cambridge University Library MS Ff.2.38, intro. Frances McSparran and P. R. Robinson (London: Scolar Press, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearsall’s figures on the Auchinleck romances relate to that larger caveat concerning romance manuscript survival raised, among numerous other noteworthy caveats, by A. S. G. Edwards in ‘Middle English Romance: the Limits of Editing, the Limits of Criticism’, in T. W. Machan (ed.), Medieval Literature: Text and Interpretation (State University of New York, Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1991) note 1: ‘Of the ninety-four separate verse romances recorded in the revised Manual of the Writings in Middle English, ed. J. B. Severs, vol. 1 (New Haven, CT: Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1967), nearly fifty survive in only a single manuscript’. Pearsall adds in his essay on fifteenth-century romance (see note 39 below) that on his own count of 95 ME verse romances, ‘only 30 occur in copies that pre-date the Thornton manuscripts (c. 1440), even though 61 at least would be regarded as of fourteenth-century provenance’ (p. 58).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Manfred Görlach, ‘Recent Facsimile Editions of Middle English Literary Manuscripts’, Anglia, vol. 105 (1987) p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See also Derek Pearsall, ‘Middle English Romance and its Audiences’, in Mary-Jo Arn and Hanneke Wirtjes, with Hans Jansen (eds), Historical and Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English for Johan Gerritsen (Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1985) pp. 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Happily we occasionally have information about manuscripts’ scribes, which can help investigations about original audience. Regarding Robert Thornton, for example, scribe of Brit. Lib. Additional MS 31042 and Lincoln Cathedral Lib. MS 91, see George R. Keiser’s articles: ‘Lincoln Cathedral Library MS 91: Life and Milieu of the Scribe’, Studies in Bibliography, vol. 32 (1979) pp. 158–79

    Google Scholar 

  14. ‘More Light on the Life and Milieu of Robert Thornton’, Studies in Bibliography, vol. 36 (1983) pp. 111–19

    Google Scholar 

  15. ‘The Nineteenth-Century Discovery of the Thornton Manuscript (Lincoln Cathedral Library MS 91’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, vol. 77 (1983) pp. 167–90

    Google Scholar 

  16. A critique of Pearsall’s view may be found in Timothy Shonk, ‘A Study of the Auchinlek Manuscript: Bookmen and Bookmaking in the Early Fourteenth Century’, Speculum, vol. 60, no. 1 (1985) pp. 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. For useful reviews of these and other recent MS facsimiles, see A. S. G. Edwards, ‘“The Whole Book”: Medieval Manuscripts in Facsimile’, Review, vol. 2 (1980) pp. 19–29

    Google Scholar 

  18. Julia Boffey, Manuscripts of English Courtly Love Lyrics in the Later Middle Ages (Woodbridge, Suffolk: D. S. Brewer, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. For her more recent overview of Shirley, see Julia Boffey and John J. Thompson, ‘12. Anthologies and Miscellanies: Production and Choice of Texts’, in Jeremy Griffiths and Derek Pearsall (eds), Book Production and Publishing in Britian, 1375–1475 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989) pp. 284–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. John J. Thompson, Robert Thornton and the London Thornton Manuscript: British Library MS Additional 31042 (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. For other examples, see also Karen Stern, ‘The London “Thornton” Miscellany: A New Description of British Museum Additional Manuscript 31042’, Scriptorium, vol. 30 (1976) pp. 26–37, 201–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Laura Hibbard Loomis, ‘The Auchinleck Manuscript and a Possible London Bookshop of 1330–40’, PMLA, vol. 57 (1942) pp. 595–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. but see P. R. Coss’s argument for the earlier existence of bookshops in ‘Aspects of Cultural Diffusion in Medieval English: the Early Romances, Local Society and Robin Hood’, Past and Present, vol. 108 (1985) pp. 60–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. See I. C. Cunningham and J. E. C. Mordkoff, ‘New Light on the Signatures in the Auchinleck Manuscript (Edinburgh, National Library of Scotland Adv. MS 19.2.1)’, Scriptorium, vol. 36 (1982) p. 291, for the suggestion that Scribe 1 may not initially have conceived of the MS as a whole.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dieter Mehl, Middle English Romances of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gisela Guddat-Figge, Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Middle English Romances (Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guddat-Figge’s discussion is also superior to the abstract and general observations in Harriet Hudson, ‘Middle English Popular Romances: the Manuscript Evidence’, Manuscripta, vol. 28 (1984) pp. 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. R. Robinson, ‘“The Booklet”: a Self-contained Unit in Composite Manuscripts’, Codicologica, vol. 3 (1980) pp. 46–69.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ralph Hanna III, ‘Booklets in Medieval Manuscripts: Further Considerations’, Studies in Bibliography, vol. 39 (1986) p. 105 and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Derek Pearsall, ‘The Development of Middle English Romance’, in Derek Brewer (ed.), Studies in Medieval English Romances: Some New Approaches (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1988) pp. 11–35 (originally appearing in Mediaeval Studies, vol. 27 (1965) pp. 91–116);

    Google Scholar 

  31. ‘The English Romance in the Fifteenth Century’, Essays and Studies, vol. (1976) pp. 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Derek Pearsall, Old and Middle English Poetry, Routledge History of English Poetry, vol. 1 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  33. George R. Keiser, review of Pearsall, Manuscripts and Readers, in Publications of the Bibliographical Society of America, vol. 79 (1985) p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sarah M. Horrall, ‘The London Thornton Manuscript: a New Collation’, Manuscripta, vol. 23 (1979) pp. 99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ralph Hanna III, ‘The Lincoln Thornton Manuscript: a Corrected Collation’, Studies in Bibliography, vol. 37 (1984) pp. 122–30

    Google Scholar 

  36. ‘The Growth of Robert Thornton’s Books’, Studies in Bibliography, vol. 40 (1987) pp. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Murray J. Evans, ‘The Explicits and Narrative Division in the Winchester MS: a Critique of Vinaver’s Malory’, Philological Quarterly, vol. 58 (1979) pp. 263–81

    Google Scholar 

  38. ‘The Two Scribes in the Winchester MS: the Ninth Explicit and Malory’s “Hoole Book”’, Manuscripta, vol. 27 (1983) pp. 38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. See Murray J. Evans, ‘Ordinatio and Narrative Links: the Impact of Malory’s Tales as a “Hoole Book”’, in James W. Spisak (ed.), Studies in Malory (Kalamazoo, Mich.: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1985) pp. 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  40. For a different approach to Malory using ME romance MS collections to illuminate the variety of his themes, see Felicity Riddy, Sir Thomas Malory (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Phillipa Hardman, ‘A Mediaeval “Library in Parvo”’, Medium Aevum, vol. 47 (1978) pp. 262–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Editorial Board, Lumiere (Co-operative) Press Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, M.J. (1992). Manuscript Studies: New Directions for Appreciating Middle English Romance. In: Simons, J. (eds) From Medieval to Medievalism. Insights. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22233-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics