Skip to main content

Abstract

The most clear-cut affirmation of the rights of states was the assertion of the principle of sovereignty. In defending this claim such writers as Bodin and Hobbes (pp. 136 and 40 above) had in effect declared that the ruler could do as he pleased within his own lands; and that those who had previously enjoyed rights independent of the prince — feudal lords, municipalities and the church — were subject to his sovereign power. The most fundamental right of rulers, and therefore of states, was to order the lives of those within their borders according to their own discretion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 the estate of Evan Luard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luard, E. (1992). The State’s Right to Intervene. In: Basic Texts in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22107-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics