Abstract
George Eliot’s fictions, like her life, at once reflect, expose and undermine the hierarchical ideologies of patriarchy. Subversion was not necessarily a fully conscious strategy on Eliot’s part, however. As Mary Poovey has noted, the female writer’s responses to the restrictions that bind her can create in her work, even without her knowledge, contradictions that ‘may emerge in the discrepancy between [her] explicit aesthetic program and the emotional affect the text generates’.1 In Eliot’s fiction, such incongruities appear most frequently in the self-subverting structure of her plots; in the exaggeratedly male or the ambivalently androgynous voices that tell her stories; and in the overdetermined position created for the reader by those plots and voices — a position that can lead the reader to supplement and to resist the text’s apparent or explicit meaning. Often, Eliot’s fictions elicit a double or a multiple reading, one which emerges from a radical disjunction between, on the one hand, the aims achieved by the conventional plot and voice and, on the other hand, the desire for a different story and treatment fostered by the narrative’s detailed attention to the consequences of sexual difference in patriarchal culture: a ‘gender plot’ works against the grain of the conventional narrative of romantic love or personal development, exposing its privileging of the masculine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mary Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1984) p. xiv.
Rachel Blau DuPlessis, Writing Beyond the Ending: Narrative Strategies of Twentieth-Century Women Writers (Bloomington, Ind., Indiana University Press, 1985) p. 3.
Stephen Marcus, ‘Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Systems of Explanation’, Salmagundi 28 (1975): 41.
U.C. Knoepflmacher, ‘George Eliot’s Anti-Romantic Romance: “Mr Gilfil’s Love-Story”’, Victorian Newsletter 31 (1967): 14.
Thomas A. Noble, George Eliot’s’ scenes of Clerical Life’ (New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1968) p. 86
David Carroll, ‘“Janet’s Repentance” and the Myth of the Organic’, Nineteenth Century Fiction 35 (1980): 338
Hugh Witemeyer, George Eliot and the Visual Arts (New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1979) p. 130
William Myers, The Technique of George Eliot (Leicester, Leicester University Press, 1984) p. 105.
Lori Hope Lefkovitz, The Character of Beauty in the Victorian Novel (Ann Arbor, Mich., UMI Research Press, 1987) p. 168.
Quoted and translated in Joseph Wiesenfarth, ‘George Eliot’s Notes for Adam Bede’, Nineteenth Century Fiction 32 (1977): 148.
Mason Harris, ‘Infanticide and Respectability: Hetty Sorrel as Abandoned Child in Adam Bede’, English Studies in Canada 9 (1983): 184.
Copyright information
© 1992 Kristin Brady
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brady, K. (1992). Scenes of Clerical Life and Adam Bede: Fictions of Female Sacrifice. In: George Eliot. Women Writers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21899-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21899-8_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-43287-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21899-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)