Advertisement

Marxian Economics and the Great Depression

  • M. C. Howard
  • J. E. King
Chapter
Part of the Radical Economics book series (RAE)

Abstract

The Great Depression was by far the most severe economic crisis in the history of capitalism. In the United States real GNP fell by 9.9 per cent in 1930, a further 7.7 per cent in 1931, and by 14.8 per cent in 1932. In the latter year industrial production in both Germany and the US was no less than 47 per cent below its 1929 level (for the other capitalist powers the collapse was less complete, but nevertheless severe).1 Marxian economists asked two questions about this cataclysm. What did it mean for the future of the capitalist system and the prospects for socialism? And how could it be explained consistently with Marx’s theory of crisis? Neither question was simple. Marx’s theory of capitalist crisis was nowhere well worked out, nor, indeed, even organised systematically, while the political history of the 1930s involved novel developments. The most notable phenomena were the success of fascism in Germany, the New Deal in the United States and the growth of state intervention elsewhere. They raised once again the question of the state’s role in modern capitalism and the basis of mass support for reaction or reform rather than revolution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    M. Bleaney, The Rise and Fall of Keynesian Economics (London: Macmillan, 1986), pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Naphtali, Wirtschaftskrisis und Arbeitslosigkeit (Berlin: Dietz, 1930), p. 23; original stress.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Kautsky, ‘Um die Einheit’, Vorwärts 11 October 1931.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Kautsky, introduction to the 3rd ed of his The Proletarian Revolution, published as ‘Die Proletarische Revolution’, Der Kampf, 24 (1931), pp. 292–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Gottschalch, Strukturveränderungen der Gesellschaft und Politisches Handeln in der Lehre von Rudolf Hilferding (Berlin: Drucker & Humblot, 1962), p. 196; cf. Bleaney, Rise and Fall, Ch. 2Google Scholar
  6. 5a.
    A. Sturmthal, The Tragedy of European Labour 1918–1939 (London: Gollancz, 1944), pp. 72–7Google Scholar
  7. 5b.
    R.A. Gates, ‘German Socialism and the Crisis of 1929–33’, Central European History 7 (1974), pp. 332–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5c.
    H. James, The German Slump: Politics and Economics 1924–36 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    F. Pollock, ‘Bemerkungen zur Wirtschaftskrise’, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 2 (1933), pp. 324–5.Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    Naphtali, Wirtschaftskrisis, p. 12; Pollock, ‘Bemerkungen’, p. 325n; cf. E. Mandel, Long Waves of Capitalist Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980) andGoogle Scholar
  11. 7a.
    L. Trotsky, ‘The Curve of Capitalist Development’ (1923) in Trotsky, Problems of Everyday Life (New York: Monad Press, 1979), pp. 272–80.Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    Naphtali, Wirtschaftskrisis, pp. 11–13; O. Bauer, Zwischen Zwei Weltkriegen? (Bratislava: Eugen Prager Verlag, 1936), pp. 22–42.Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    Pollock, ‘Bemerkungen’, p. 325; cf. N. Moszkowska, Zur Kritik Moderner Krisentheorien (Prague: Michael Kacha, 1935), p. 102.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    H. Grossmann, Das Akkumulations- und Zusammenbruchsgesetz des Kapitalistischen Systems (Zugleich eine Krisentheorie) (Leipzig: C.L. Hirschfeld, 1929)Google Scholar
  15. 10a.
    cf. P.M. Sweezy, The Theory of Capitalist Development (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970; first published 1942), ch. XI, andGoogle Scholar
  16. 10b.
    F.R. Hansen, The Breakdown of Capitalism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985).Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    E. Varga, The Great Crisis and its Political Consequences: Economics and Politics (New York: Howard Fertig, 1974; first published 1935), pp. 13, 73–4Google Scholar
  18. 11a.
    E.A. Preobrazhensky, The Decline of Capitalism (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1985; first published in Russian in 1931), pp. 111, 117–18, 164–6.Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    L. Corey, The Decline of American Capitalism (London: John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1935), pp. 12, 218; Moszkowska, Zur Kritik Moderner Krisentheorien, pp. 101–2Google Scholar
  20. 12a.
    F. Sternberg, Der Niedergang des Deutschen Kapitalismus (Berlin: Rohwolt, 1932), pp. 151–3.Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    L. Trotsky, ‘The Death Agony of Capitalism and the Tasks of the Fourth International’ in Trotsky, The Transitional Programme for Socialist Revolution (New York: Pathfinder Press, 1974), pp. 111–52Google Scholar
  22. 13a.
    Trotsky, The Living Thoughts of Karl Marx (London: Cassell, 1940), p. 23Google Scholar
  23. 13b.
    P. Mattick, ‘Die Todeskrise des Kapitalismus’ (1933), in K. Korsch, P. Mattick and A. Pannekoek, Zusammen-bruchstheorie des Kapitalismus oder Revolutionäres Subjekt (Berlin: Karin Kramer Verlag, 1973), pp. 100–12Google Scholar
  24. 13c.
    cf. A. Pannekoek, ‘Die Zusammenbruchstendenz des Kapitalismus’ (1934), in ibid, pp. 20–45.Google Scholar
  25. 14.
    J. van Heijenoort, With Trotsky in Exile: from Prinkipo to Coyoacan (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 14a.
    F. Sternberg, ‘Conversations with Trotsky’, Survey 47 (1963), pp. 146–59Google Scholar
  27. 14b.
    For a trenchant critique of Trotsky on this question see G. Hodgson, Trotsky and Fatalistic Marxism (Nottingham: Spokesman Books, 1975), pp. 22–7Google Scholar
  28. 14c.
    and J. Molyneux, Leon Trotsky’s Theory of Revolution (Hassocks: Harvester, 1981), pp. 175–9.Google Scholar
  29. 15.
    Sweezy, Theory, pp. 214–36; cf. A.H. Hansen, ‘Economic Progress and Declining Population Growth’, American Economic Review 29, 1939, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  30. 16.
    Sweezy, Theory, pp. 269–86; cf. P.A. Baran and P.M. Sweezy, Monopoly Capital (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966) and below Ch. 6Google Scholar
  31. 17.
    Moszkowska, Zur Kritik Moderner Krisentheorien, pp. 26, 102; cf. Moszkowska, Zur Dynamik des Spatkapitalismus (Zurich: Verlag ‘der Aufbruch’, 1943), and Corey, Decline of American Capitalism, pp. 168–9.Google Scholar
  32. 17a.
    Similar ideas were expressed by the Soviet economist E. Preobrazhensky in 1931; see R.B. Day, The ‘Crisis’ and the ‘Crash’: Soviet Studies of the West (1917–1939) (London: New Left Books, 1981), pp. 213–8.Google Scholar
  33. 19.
    Varga, The Great Crisis, pp. 68–9; cf. Day, The ‘Crisis’ and the ‘Crash’, pp. 269–70 and C. Gannage, ‘E.S. Varga and the Theory of State Monopoly Capitalism’, Review of Radical Political Economics 12, 1980, pp 36–49.Google Scholar
  34. 21.
    L. Corey, The Crisis of the Middle Class (New York: Covici-Friede, 1935), p. 218; Hodgson, Trotsky and Fatalistic Marxism, pp. 24, 31.Google Scholar
  35. 22.
    F. Pollock, ‘Die Gegenwärtige Lage des Kapitalismus und die Aussichten einer Planwirtschaftlichen Neuordnung’, Zeitschrift far Sozialforschung, 1, 1932, p. 27.Google Scholar
  36. 24.
    F. Pollock, ‘State Capitalism: Its Possibilities and Limitations’, in A. Arato and E. Gebhardt (eds), The Essential Frankfurt School Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978), pp. 71–94; the article was first published in 1941.Google Scholar
  37. 24a.
    See also Pollock, ‘Is National Socialism a New Order?’, Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9, 1941, pp. 440–55.Google Scholar
  38. 26.
    Ibid, pp. 86–7; cf. Ch. 3 below and J. Burnham, The Managerial Revolution (New York: J. Day, 1941) Ch. 9.Google Scholar
  39. 27.
    M. Salvadori, Karl Kautsky and the Socialist Revolution 1880–1938 (London: New Left Books, 1979), pp. 341–3.Google Scholar
  40. 28.
    M. Jay, The Dialectical Imagination (London: Heinemann, 1973), pp. 154–5Google Scholar
  41. 28a.
    cf. D. Held, Introduction to Critical Theory (London: Hutchinson, 1980), pp. 282–95. and Hansen Breakdown of Capitalism pp 66, 97–8Google Scholar
  42. 29.
    F. Neumann, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism (London: Gollancz, 1942); cf. Jay, Dialectical Imagination, pp. 161–5 and Held Introduction pp. 52–65.Google Scholar
  43. 30.
    Sweezy, Theory, p. 337n; cf. ibid, p. 341, where Sweezy repudiates his earlier use of ‘state capitalism’ to describe the Nazi regime; Sweezy, ‘The Illusion of the “Managerial Revolution”’, Science and Society, 6, 1942, pp. 6–10Google Scholar
  44. 30a.
    and R. Hilferding, ‘State Capitalism or Totalitarian State Economy’, in C. Wright Mills (ed.), The Marxists (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963), pp. 323–pl; the article was first published in 1941.Google Scholar
  45. 31.
    Cited by J.M. Cammett, ‘Communist Theories of Fascism 1920–1935’, Science and Society, 31, 1967, pp. 149–63Google Scholar
  46. 31a.
    cf. L. Trotsky, The Struggle Against Fascism in Germany (New York: Pathfinder, 1971) and Preobrazhensky, Decline of Capitalism, ch. 11.Google Scholar
  47. 36.
    M. Tugan-Baranovsky, Studien Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Handelskrisen in England (Jena: Fischer, 1901), pp. 197–231Google Scholar
  48. 36a.
    L. von Bortkiewicz, ‘Value and Price in the Marxian System’, International Economic Papers 2, 1952, pp. 36–51 (first published 1907).Google Scholar
  49. 36b.
    See also B. Croce, Historical Materialism and the Economics of Karl Marx (London: Cass, 1966), pp. 142–58 (an essay first published in 1899); see also volume I of this book, Ch. 10; and Ch. 7 below.Google Scholar
  50. 37.
    R. Luxemburg, ‘The Accumulation of Capital: An Anti-Critique’, in K. Tarbuck (ed.), R. Luxemburg and N. Bukharin, Imperialism and the Accumulation of Capital (London: Allen Lane, 1972), p. 76n; cf. K. Kautsky, ‘Krisentheorien’, Die Neue Zeit, 20, 1901–2, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
  51. 38.
    R. Hilferding, Finance Capital (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980; first published 1910), pp. 257–6, and Chs 5 and 6 of volume I of this book.Google Scholar
  52. 40.
    Grossmann, Das Akkumulations, pp. 119–22; cf. O. Bauer, ‘Die Akkumulation von Kapital’, Die Neue Zeit, 31, 1913, pp. 831–8, 862–74, translated in History of Political Economy, 18, 1986, pp. 87–110. A full discussion of Grossmann’s model and its reception is given in Ch. 16 of volume I of this book.Google Scholar
  53. 41.
    See respectively E. Varga, ‘Akkumulation und Zusammenbruch des Kapitalismus’, Unter Dem Banner Des Marxismus, 4, 1930, pp. 74–6Google Scholar
  54. 41a.
    H. Bauer, ‘Ein Neuer Zusammenbruchstheoretiker’, Der Kampf, 22, 1929, pp. 270–80Google Scholar
  55. 41b.
    and F. Sternberg, ‘Der Imperialismus’ und Seine Kritiker (Berlin: Soziologische Verlags-Anstalt, 1929), pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
  56. 43.
    J. Strachey, The Nature of Capitalist Crisis (London: Gollancz, 1935), pp. 324–6Google Scholar
  57. 43a.
    M.H. Dobb, Political Economy and Capitalism (London: Routledge, 1937), pp. 94–9, 108–14; Bauer, Zwischen, pp. 55–6, 62–6.Google Scholar
  58. 45.
    Moszkowska, Das Marxsche System: Ein Beitrag Zu Dessen Aufbau (Berlin: Verlag Hans Robert Engelmann, 1929), pp. 118–19; Moszkowska, Zur Kritik, pp. 46–7; cf. Sweezy, Theory, pp. 100–108.Google Scholar
  59. 46.
    K. Marx, Capital, volume III (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1962), Ch. XIV.Google Scholar
  60. 54.
    O. Bauer, Kapitalismus und Sozialismus Nach dem Weltkrieg (Vienna: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung, 1931) p. 199; Naphtali, Wirtschaftskrisis, pp. 13, 20–1Google Scholar
  61. 54a.
    F. Sternberg, ‘Die Weltwirtschaftskrisis’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 36, 1932, p. 127.Google Scholar
  62. 56.
    E. Baumann, ‘Keynes’ Revision der Liberalistischen Nationalökonomie’, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 5, 1936, pp. 384–403 (‘Baumann’ is a pseudonym for Pollock and Kurt Mandelbaum).Google Scholar
  63. 58.
    E. Bernstein, Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism and an Affirmation (New York: Schocken Books, 1961)Google Scholar
  64. 58a.
    R. Luxemburg, Reform or Revolution (New York: Pathfinder Press, 1970); Day, The ‘Crisis’ and the ‘Crash’: Sweezy, Theory, pp. 156–62; see also Chs 4 and 14 of volume I of this book.Google Scholar
  65. 66.
    M. Wolfram (ed.), Political Economy: Marxist Study Courses (Chicago: Banner Press, 1976; first published c.1933). pp. 360–5.Google Scholar
  66. 70.
    Corey, Decline, p. 117; cf. Sternberg, ‘Die Weltwirtschaftskrisis’, pp. 112–18, and (at a more popular level) A. Rochester, Rulers of America: A Study in Finance Capital (London: Lawrence & Wishart, n.d., ? 1937), pp. 286–298.Google Scholar
  67. 71.
    E. Varga, Two Systems: Socialist Economy and Capitalist Economy (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1939), p. 89; cf. Varga, The Great Crisis, pp. 19–23, and Day, The ‘Crisis’ and the ‘Crash’.Google Scholar
  68. 73.
    For Dobb’s own subsequent dissatisfaction with Political Economy and Capitalism, see M.H. Dobb, ‘Random Biographical Notes’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2, 1978, p. 119.Google Scholar
  69. 76.
    See e.g. M. Bronfenbrenner, ‘ “Das Kapital” for the Modern Man’, Science and Society, 29, 1967, pp. 419–38.Google Scholar
  70. 77.
    On orthodox theories of the Depression, see G. Haberler, Prosperity and Depression (New York: Columbia University Press, 1941)Google Scholar
  71. 77a.
    W. E. Stoneman, A History of the Economic Analysis of the Great Depression in America (New York: Garland, 1979) andGoogle Scholar
  72. 77b.
    K. Kim, Equilbrium Business Cycle Theory in Historical Perpective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  73. 78.
    G. Barrett, ‘Equilibrium Business Cycle Theory in Historical Perspective’, History of Economic Thought Society of Australias Bulletin, 9, 1988, pp. 24–9. (We owe this reference to John Lodewijks.)Google Scholar
  74. 79.
    M.C. Howard and J.E. King, The Political Economy of Marx (Harlow: Longman, second edition 1985)], 2nd edn, pp. 209–11Google Scholar
  75. 80.
    J. Robinson, An Essay on Marxian Economics (London: Macmillan, 1942), p. 95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© M. C. Howard and J. E. King 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Howard
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. E. King
    • 3
  1. 1.University of WaterlooCanada
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaRiversideUSA
  3. 3.La Trobe UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations