Abstract
From the greatest Islamic state we pass to the greatest colonial empire. The Turkish salt administration under the Ottoman public debt administration was part of the synarchic dimension of the European-centred world order. It was therefore international, innovative and modernizing. The Indian salt administration under the raj, on the other hand, was part of the other side of the European-centred world order: direct colonialism by a single power. It was therefore national, conservative and stabilizing, though the stability provided scope for what has been called the modernity of tradition, India’s special path of progress.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
H. Furber, John Company at Work, A Study of European Expansion in India in the Late Eighteenth Century (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1951).
See Curzon’s remarks to the Japanese ambassador in July 1919, E. L. Woodward and Rohan Butler (eds), Documents on British Foreign Policy, Vol. VI, June 1919 to April 1920 (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1956) p. 614.
Somendra Chandra Nandy, Life and Times of Cantoo Baboo (Krishna Kanta Nandy) The Banian of Warren Hastings, Vol. I, The Early Career of Cantoo Baboo (1742–1772) and his Trade in Salt and Silk (Allied Publishers, Bombay, 1978) p. 97.
A. M. Serajuddin, ‘The Condition of the Salt Manufacturers of Bengal under the Rule of the East India Company’, Asiatic Society of Bangladesh (Dacca), 18:1 (1973) pp. 54–73.
Sir George Dunbar, History of India from Earliest Times to 1939, 2 vols (Nicholson and Watson, London, 1949) II, p. 556.
Sir Richard Dane, Report by Sir Richard Dane, KCIE, on the Reorganization of the Salt Revenue Administration in China, 1913–1917 (Chief Inspectorate of the Central Salt Administration, Peking, 1918) p. 77.
Ibid., p. 79.
Ibid., p. 150.
Sahyasachi Bhattacharyya, Financial Foundations of the British Raj (Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Simla, 1971) pp. 197–202, p. 290;
Sir John Strachey, India, Its Administration and Progress (Macmillan, London 1911) pp. 175–83;
W. W. Hunter, The Indian Empire, Its People, History and Products (Truebner, London, 1884) pp. 452–5, 622–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 S. A. M. Adshead
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adshead, S.A.M. (1992). The Indian Salt Administration under the Raj. In: Salt and Civilization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21841-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21841-7_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21843-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21841-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)