North-South Issues, the Common Heritage of Mankind and Global Environmental Change

  • Kilaparti Ramakrishna


Gro Harlem Brundtland, Prime Minister of Norway and Chairperson of the World Commission on Environment and Development, was awarded the Indira Gandhi Prize for Peace, Disarmament and Development in New Delhi on 20 September 1990.1 This event is significant, because Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister of India, led the Indian delegation to the first United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, held in Stockholm in 1972, and articulated what soon became the acknowledged position of the developing countries on environmental issues.


Celestial Body Ozone Layer United Nations Environment Programme Ocean Floor Montreal Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    See Kilaparti Ramakrishna, ‘The Emergence of Environmental Law in the Developing Countries: A Case Study of India’, Ecology Law Quarterly (Vol. 12, No. 4, 1985) pp. 907–35.Google Scholar
  2. 16.
    Louis B. Sohn, Implications Of The Law Of The Sea Convention Regarding The Protection And Preservation Of The Marine Environment (San Francisco, CA: Paper presented to the 18th Annual Conference on the Law of the Sea, Law of the Sea Institute and the University of San Francisco, 24 September 1984) p. 5.Google Scholar
  3. 21.
    See Fred Rucker, ‘The Politics Of Ocean Pollution: The Third Law of the Sea Conference and International Structures for Environmental Protection’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Journal (Vol. 1, 1977) pp. 316–19.Google Scholar
  4. 23.
    Sohn, op. cit., in note 16.Google Scholar
  5. 28.
    See Richard Elliot Benedick, ‘Building on the Vienna Convention: Lessons from “the Ozone Hole”’, EPA Journal (March/April 1990) pp. 41–4.Google Scholar
  6. 29.
    While this question has not been directly addressed elsewhere, an interesting analysis, nevertheless, appears in Frederic L. Kirgis, Jr., ‘Editorial Comment: Standing to Challenge Human Endeavors that Could Change the Climate’, American Journal of International Law (Vol. 84, No. 2, April 1990) pp. 525–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 30.
    Maurice Hope-Thompson, ‘The Third World And The Law Of The Sea: The Attitude Of The Group Of 77 Toward The Continental Shelf’, Boston College Third World Law Journal (Vol. 1, No. 1, 1980) p. 46.Google Scholar
  8. 32.
    D. H. N. Johnson, ‘Air And Outer Space Law And The New International Economic Order’, in Air And Outer Space Law (Thessaloniki, Greece: Thesaurus Acroasium of The Institute of Public International Law and International Relations of Thessaloniki, 1981) p. 390.Google Scholar
  9. 33.
    Burns H. Weston et al., Basic Documents In International Law And World Order (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1980) pp. 341–2.Google Scholar
  10. 34.
    Bradley Larschan and Bonnie C. Brennan, ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in International Law’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (Vol. 21, 1983) p. 305.Google Scholar
  11. 35.
    Christopher C. Joyner, ‘Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly (Vol. 35, 1986) pp. 191–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 36.
    Weston, op. cit., in note 33, pp. 341–2.Google Scholar
  13. 37.
    Carl Q. Christol, ‘The International Law of Space Environment Resources’, in Air And Outer Space Law (Thessaloniki, Greece: Thesaurus Acroasium of the Institute of Public International Law And International Relations of Thessaloniki, 1981) pp. 581–2.Google Scholar
  14. 38.
    See Johnson, op. cit., in note 32, p. 398.Google Scholar
  15. 39.
    Leslie I. Tennen, ‘Outer Space: A Preserve For All Humankind’, Houston Journal Of International Law (Vol. 2, 1979) p. 154.Google Scholar
  16. 40.
    Boleslaw Adam Boczek, ‘Ideology and the Law of the Sea: The Challenge of the New International Economic Order’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review (Vol. 7, No. 1, 1984) p. 2.Google Scholar
  17. 41.
    Johnson, op. cit., in note 32, p. 380.Google Scholar
  18. 44.
    See Joyner, op. cit., in note 35, p. 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 45.
    See Boczek, op. cit., in note 40, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  20. 46.
    Christopher C. Joyner and Ethel R. Theis, ‘The United States and Antarctica: Rethinking the Interplay of Law and Interests’, Cornell International Law Journal (Vol. 20, 1987) p. 99.Google Scholar
  21. 47.
    Boczek, op. cit., in note 40, p. 20.Google Scholar
  22. 50.
    Hasjim Djalal, ‘The Developing Countries and the Law of the Sea Conference’, Columbia Journal of World Business (Vol. 15, 1980) p. 22.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    Boczek, op. cit., in note 40, p. 25.Google Scholar
  24. 53.
    Joyner, op. cit., in note 35, pp. 198–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 54.
    See Larschan and Brennan, op. cit., in note 34Google Scholar
  26. and Joyner, op. cit., in note 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 60.
    See WMO/UNEP, IPCC First Assessment Report: Overview (31 August 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Millennium Publishing Group 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kilaparti Ramakrishna

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations