The Problem of Astrology

  • Hilary M. Carey


This book is about astrology in England at the late medieval court and university. This time and place is critical for tracking one of the elusive transformations of astrology from elite to popular culture which have been a characteristic feature of its history in the west.


Thirteenth Century Fifteenth Century Fourteenth Century Twelfth Century English Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    For some further discussion of this theme see Hilary Carey, ‘Astrology at the English Court in the Later Middle Ages’ in Patrick Curry (ed.), Astrology, Science and Society: Historical Essays (Woodbridge, Suffolk, 1987).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Symon de Phares, Receuil des plus célèbres astrologues et quelque hommes doctes faict par Symon de Phares du temps de Charles VIII, ed. Ernest Wickersheimer (Paris, 1929) and see Chapter Six below.Google Scholar
  3. Nancy Reagan and William Novak, My Turn. The Memoirs of Nancy Reagan (London, 1989). Nancy Reagan comments ‘When you’re as frightened as I was, you reach out for help and comfort in any direction.’Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. S. Lewis, The Discarded Image (Cambridge, 1964).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    The earliest Babylonian horoscope, that most characteristic artefact of western astrology, is dated 29 April 409 BC, though Babylonian horoscopes occur in greatest numbers from about 200 BC. There are considerably more Greek horoscopes, although they date from after the birth of Christ, and Neugebauer takes this as confirmation of the Greek role in the development of astrology as a ‘science’: O. Neugebauer and H. B. van Hoesen, Greek Horoscopes, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society (Philadelphia, 1959) pp. 161–2 have a distribution map, and see also A. Sachs, ‘Babylonian horoscopes’, Journal of Cuneiform Studies 2 (1948) 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    For the modern occult revival see Robert Galbreath, ‘The History of Modern Occultism; A Bibliographical Survey’, Journal of Popular Culture 5 (1971) 726–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. For a French analysis of modern believers in astrology see Philippe Defrance, Claude Fischler, et. al., Le Retour des astrologues (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. I would agree with the analysis of Mircea Eliade, ‘The Occult and the Modern World’, in Occultism, Witchcraft and Cultural Fashions: Essays in Comparative Religions (Chicago, 1976), in a paper first delivered on 24 May 1974, that modern astrology, in common with most of the varied products of the occult revival, represents a rejection of the current values of western, material society.Google Scholar
  9. As such it has more in common with the millenial cults of the Middle Ages than with astrology, which remained largely the preserve of the establishment elite, as we hope to demonstrate. For the history of modern astrology, including its part in the rise of National Socialism, see Ellic Howe, Urania’s Children: The Strange World of the Astrologers (London, 1967).Google Scholar
  10. Howe’s The Magicians of the Golden Dawn. A Documentary History of a Magical Order, 1887–1923 (London, 1972: 2nd ed. 1985) is also of interest.Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    T. O. Wedel, The Mediaeval Attitude toward Astrology, Yale Studies in English LX (New Haven, 1920) p. iii.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Wayne Shumaker, The Occult Sciences in the Renaissance (Berkeley, 1972) pp. xv–xvi, 7–16. See the comment, ‘however pardonable belief in astrology may have been in the Renaissance, in modern times faith in it is more likely to tell us more about psychic needs than about the actual workings of the cosmos’.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    F. Saxl, ‘The Revival of Late Antique Astrology’, in Lectures, 2 vols (London, 1957) p. 82.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    G. E. R. Lloyd, Magic, Reason and Experience (Cambridge, 1979) pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  15. See also the seminal study by E. R. Dodds, The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1951).Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    This is the approach adopted by J. D. North, Horoscopes and History (London, 1986) preface and introduction. North does add, ‘Heaven forbid that the book should be judged as a manual for astrologers — even though it may be safely expected to become compulsory reading for all their introductory courses.’Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    Patrick Curry, Prophecy and Power. Astrology in Early Modern England (Princeton, New Jersey, 1989), especially the heartfelt introduction on the value of astrology studies, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    This is a debt acknowledged by Lloyd, Magic, Reason and Experience, introduction, pp. 1–8. The new school of anthropological history, much of it inspired by the early work of Claude Lévi-Strauss and E. E. Evans-Pritchard’s classic study, Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (Oxford, 1937), has been remarkably prolific. See the account by Donald Nugent, ‘Witchcraft Studies, 1959–1971: A Bibliographical Survey’, Journal of Popular Culture 5 (1971) 710–25, esp. 712–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 20.
    Edward Grant, ‘Cosmology’, pp. 265–302, in Science in the Middle Ages ed. David C. Lindberg (Chicago, 1978) pp. 265–6;Google Scholar
  20. C. S. Lewis, The Discarded Image (Cambridge, 1964);Google Scholar
  21. J. D. North, Chaucer’s Universe (Oxford, 1988) Part I.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Richard Lemay, Abu Ma’Shar and Latin Aristotelianism in the Middle Ages ed. David C. Lindberg (Chicago, 1978) pp. 265–6.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Bouché-Leclercq, L’Astrologie Grecque (Paris, 1899) p. 1.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Bouché-Leclercq, L’Astrologie Grecque, pp. 324–5. The doctrine of the macrocosm and microcosm has been the subject of much learned interest, particularly to historians of the Renaissance. The most eloquent testimony to the force of the idea in medieval cosmology is the small corpus of poems associated with the twelfth-century Platonists Bernard Silvestris, Alan of Lille and William of Conches, though Adelard of Bath’s De eodem et diverso and Daniel of Morley’s Philosophia can legitimately be seen as products of the same impulse. For this group see especially Winthrop Wetherbee, Platonism and Poetry in the Twelfth Century (Princeton, N.J., 1972)Google Scholar
  25. and for Bernard Silvester, Brian Stock’s Myth and Science in the Twelfth Century (Princeton, N.J., 1972).Google Scholar
  26. For the medieval development of the microcosm/macrocosm theme see M. T. d’Alverny, ‘Le Cosmos Symbolique du XIIe Siècle’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littérature du Moyen Age 28 (1953) 31–81; F. Saxl, ‘Macrocosm and Microcosm in Medieval Pictures’, in Lectures pp. 73–84;Google Scholar
  27. and for the Renaissance, S. K. Henninger, Jr., Touches of Sweet Harmony. Pythagorean Cosmology and Renaissance Poetics (San Marino, California, 1974);Google Scholar
  28. Rudolf Allers, ‘Microcosmus. From Anaximander to Paracelsus’, Traditio 2 (1944) 319–407;Google Scholar
  29. George P. Conger, Theories of Macrocosms and Microcosms in the History of Philosophy (New York, 1922). I would like to thank Professor Brian Vickers for these references. For an Arabic account of the theory of astral power, see Al-Kindi’s De Radiis (or Theorica artium magicarum) ed. by M. T. d’Alverny and F. Hudry in Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littérature du Moyen Age 41 (1974) 139–260.Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    The best introduction to this topic is the monograph by T. O. Wedel, The Mediaeval Attitude toward Astrology. Yale Studies in English LX (New Haven, 1920).Google Scholar
  31. Astrology is also central to Edward Peters, The Magician, the Witch and the Law (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  32. For the classical debate the central study is D. Amand’s Fatalisme et liberté dans l’Antiquité grecque (Louvain, 1945),Google Scholar
  33. but see the article by A. A. Long, ‘Astrology: arguments pro and contra‘, in Science and Speculation. Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice ed. Jonathan Barnes (Cambridge, 1982) pp. 165–92. The topic is also treated in the vast literature of classical astrology. See eg. A. Bouché-Leclercq, L’Astrologie grecque, pp. 570–609; idem, Histoire de la divination dans l’antiquité, 4 vols (Paris, 1879–82) I; Franz Boll, ‘Studien über Claudius Ptolemäus. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der greichischen Philosophie und Astrologie’, Jahrbücher fur classische Philologie, supp. xxi (1894) 47–244, pp. 181–238;Google Scholar
  34. F. Boll and C. Bezold, Sternglaube und Sterndeutung. Die Geschichte und das Wesen der Astrologie, 1st ed. 1917; 4th ed., ed. W. Gundel, (Leipzig and Berlin, 1931).Google Scholar
  35. Franz Cumont, Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans (New York and London, 1912) pp. 153–61.Google Scholar
  36. For an excellent account of early Christian objections to astrology see M. L. W. Laistner, ‘The Western Church and Astrology during the Early Middle Ages’, Harvard Theological Review 34 (1941) 251–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laistner points out that the Church’s official condemnation of astrology was always subsidiary to her attack on various superstitions and pagan practices, which she rightly recognised as the real enemy, ibid., p. 265. For later periods see M. J. Fontaine, ‘Isidore de Seville et l’astrologie’, Revue des études latines 31 (1953) 271–300;Google Scholar
  38. Joshua D. Lipton, ‘The rational evaluation of astrology in the period of the Arabo-Latin translations ca. 1126–1187 A.D.’, Dissertation of University of California-Los Angeles (California 1978);Google Scholar
  39. M.-T. d’Alverny, ‘Astrologues et théologiens au XIIe siècle’, Mélanges offerts à M.-D. Chenu (Paris, 1967) pp. 31–50; idem, ‘Un témoins muet des luttes doctrinales du XIIIe siècle’, Archives d’hist. doct. litt. Moyen Age 17 (1949) 223–48;Google Scholar
  40. R. C. Dales, ‘Robert Grosseteste’s View on Astrology’, Mediaeval Studies 29 (1967) 357–63;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Eugenio Garin, La zodiaco delia vita: La polemica sull’ Astrologia dal Trecento al Cinquecento (Rome, 1976), published in English under the title Astrology in the Renaissance: The Zodiac of Life, trans. C. Jackson and J. Allen (London, Boston etc., 1983);Google Scholar
  42. G. W. Coopland, Nicole Oresme and the Astrologers: A study of his ‘Livre de Divinacions’ (Liverpool, 1952);Google Scholar
  43. Françoise Bonney, ‘Autour de Jean Gerson: Opinions de théologiens sur les superstitions et la sorcellerie au début du XVe siècle’, Moyen Age 77 (1971) 85–98.Google Scholar
  44. 34.
    See George Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science III (Baltimore, 1947) pp. 899–900 (Ibn al-Akfani); p. 1773 (Ibn Khaldun), for two Arabic classifications of the sciences which include astrology.Google Scholar
  45. 35.
    For examples of the arguments raised by either side to the dispute see M. A. F. Mehren, ‘Vues d’Avicenne sur l’astrologie’, Le Muséon 3 (1884) 383–403;Google Scholar
  46. J.-C. Vadet, ‘Une défence de l’astrologie dans le madhal d’abu Ma’sar al Balhi’, Annales islamologiques 5 (1963) 131–80.Google Scholar
  47. 36.
    Toufic Fahd, La divination Arabe (Leiden, 1966).Google Scholar
  48. 39.
    For Augustine on astrology see his De diversis quaestionibus PL 40, 28–9; De Doctrina Christiana, ii.22, PL 34, 51–2. R. C. Dales ‘Robert Grosseteste’s Views on Astrology’ Mediaeval Studies 29 (1967) 357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. R. W. Southern, Robert Grosseteste: the growth of an English mind in medieval Europe (Oxford, 1986) pp. 101–7.Google Scholar
  50. 40.
    Charles Trinkaus, ‘Coluccio Salutati’s Critique of Astrology in the Context of His Natural Philosophy’ Speculum 64 (1989) 46–67, at pp. 65–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 42.
    Edward Grant, ‘The condemnation of 1277. God’s absolute power, and physical thought in the late Middle Ages’ Viator 10 (1979) 211–44;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. John F. Wippel ‘The condemnation of 1270 and 1277 at Paris’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 7 (1977) 169–201.Google Scholar
  53. 43.
    Oresme’s interest in the rationality of astrology is stressed by Stefano Caroti, ‘Nicole Oresme’s Polemic against Astrology in his Quodlibeta’, in Astrology, Science and Society: Historical Essays, ed. Patrick Curry (Woodbridge, Suffolk, 1987) pp. 75–93, against the usual charge (by horndike and Coopland) that he defends astrology more than he attacks it.Google Scholar
  54. See also G. W. Coopland, Nicole Oresme and the Astrologers (Liverpool, 1952).Google Scholar
  55. Henry of Langestein’s Tractatus contra astrologos coniunctionistas de eventibus futurorum and Oresme’s Tractatus contra astrologos are edited by Herbert Pruckner, Studien zu den astrologischen Schriften des Heinrichs von Langestein, Studien der Bibliothek Warburg 4 (Leipzig, 1933). John D. North, ‘Celestial Influence — the major premiss of astrology’ in ‘“Astrologi Hallucinate”: Stars and the End of the world in Luther’s Time, ed. Paola Zambelli (Berlin, 1986) pp. 88–96.Google Scholar
  56. D. J. Fitzgerald, ‘Some notes on Pico’s disputes with astrology’, Arts libéraux et philosophie au Moyen Age, Actes du 4e Congrès International de Philosophie Médiévale (Paris, 1969) pp. 1049–55.Google Scholar
  57. 45.
    The various statutes have been edited by H. Denifle and A. Chatelain, Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (Paris, 1889) I, 543–60.Google Scholar
  58. 47.
    See for example the questions indexed by Palémon Glorieux, La Littérature Quodlibétique de 1260 à 1320, 2 vols, (Paris, 1925–35). For some English questions on these topics see below, p. 179 n. 87.Google Scholar
  59. 50.
    Peters, Magician, the Witch and the Law pp. 118–37. W. R. Jones, ‘Political Uses of Sorcery in Medieval Europe’, The Historian 34 (1972) 670–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 52.
    R. I. Moore, The Formation of a Persecuting Society: power and deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250 (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
  61. 53.
    Dales, ‘Robert Grosseteste’; Stuart Jenks, ‘Astrometeorology in the Middle Ages’, Isis 74 (1983) 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hilary M. Carey 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilary M. Carey
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations