Skip to main content

Philosophy or Sociological Theory?

  • Chapter
Back to Sociological Theory
  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

A work which clearly illustrates the shift from sociological theory to philosophical analysis in recent years is Terry Johnson, Christopher Dendeker and Clive Ashworth’s The Structure of Social Theory,1 (henceforth referred to as TSST). According to the authors, every social theory explicitly or implicitly deals with two fundamental questions. The first is ontological and raises the issue of the nature of social reality, of whether it is material or ideal; the second concerns the epistemological problem of the nature of knowledge about social reality, of whether or not such knowledge is derived from realist or nominalist assumptions. Basing themselves on these two dichotomies (material/ideal, real/nominal), the authors of TSST construct a four-fold typology that enables them to discuss systematically and in a theoretically rigorous fashion four major strategies of sociological theorising: those of empiricism, subjectivism, substantialism and rationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T. Johnson, C. Dandeker and C. Ashworth, The Structure of Social Theory: Dilemmas and Strategies, London: Macmillan, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The term convention is taken from R. Keat and J. Urry’s Social Theory as Science, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See T. Parsons, Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1966, pp. 11–14; see also his Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See L. Althusser, For Marx, London: Allen Lane, Penguin 1969, pp. 183–90 and p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See H. A. Landsberger, ‘Parsons’ theory of organisations’, in M. Black (ed.), The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1963, pp. 219 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. William F. Whyte, Man and Organization, Homewood, Ill.: Richard Irwin & Co., 1959, pp. 40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. He also allows for external mechanisms of change (that is, outside the social system), such as diffusion. The diffusion aspects of Parsonian evolutionism have been adopted by various modernisation theories trying to explain the socio-economic trajectory of present-day poor countries in terms of a transfer of culture, technology, and capital from the fully ‘modernised’ West to the ‘modernising’ Third World. The overriding tendency of such theories is to adopt also Parsons’ lopsided system-oriented approach. Questions beginning with Who are rarely asked; the transfer of technology, culture, and capital is conceptualised as a disembodied process taking place in a power vacuum, in a situation where social classes, interest groups, relationships of dependence and exploitation are absent. For a critique of modernisation theories along such lines see H. Bernstein, ‘Modernisation theory and the sociological study of development’, Journal of Development Studies, vol. VII, 1971; see also A. Hoogvelt, The Sociology of Developing Societies, London: Macmillan, 1976, pp. 9–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Nicos P. Mouzelis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mouzelis, N.P. (1991). Philosophy or Sociological Theory?. In: Back to Sociological Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21760-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics