Skip to main content

Abstract

The persistent interest in US national security policy and the intensity of the debate revolving around it emanate from the following factors: (a) America’s predominant role in the international arena, yet its often limited ability to influence desired outcomes; (b) the West European and Japanese dependence on US protection accompanied by a reluctance to support, consistently, US policies; (c) the growing linkage of traditional security issues with domestic concerns; (d) the increasing military power and expanding influence of the USSR; (e) the perception of an increasing risk of nuclear war between the superpowers; (f) the growing global interdependence and the emergence of new security issues such as energy and economic stagnation; and (g) the evident inability of recent US administrations to formulate and execute policies that preclude and/or reduce damage to vital US global interests. The consensus is that national security policy is in a permanent state of challenge, yet few agree on the nature of the challenge and on the means and methods to meet it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John G. Stoessinger, Henry Kissinger: The Anguish of Power (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1976), pp. 137–38;

    Google Scholar 

  2. George W. Ball, Diplomacy for a Crowded World (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1976), pp. 155–56;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peter W. Dickson, Kissinger and the Meaning of History (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp. 113–14;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard A. Falk, What’s Wrong with Henry Kissinger’s Foreign Policy (Princeton University, 1974), pp. 5–6;

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Landau, Kissinger: The Uses of Power (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1972), pp. 114–15;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zbigniew Brzezinski, “Half Past Nixon,” Foreign Policy 3 (Summer 1971):3–20, “U.S. Foreign Policy: The Search for Focus,” Foreign Affairs 51 (July 1973):708–27, “The Deceptive Structure of Peace,” Foreign Policy 14 (Spring 1974):35–55, “Shifting Mood and System,” The Atlantic Community Quarterly 12 (Fall 1974):319–26, “America in a Hostile World,” Foreign Policy 23 (Summer 1976):65–96;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley Hoffmann, “Choices,” Foreign Policy 12 (Fall 1973):3–42;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Robert Schaetzel, “Some European Questions for Dr. Kissinger,” Foreign Policy 12 (Fall 1973):66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent Davis, Henry Kissinger and Bureaucratic Politics Essay Series, No. 9 (Institute of International Studies, University of South Carolina, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suetonious, “Born to Skim,” The New Republic 176 (January 1977):8;Robert Scheer, “Carter’s Man Zbig: Profound or Banal?” Los Angeles Times (January 23, 1977), pp. 24–25;Russell Watson and others, “Life at Brzezinski U,” Newsweek LXXXIX:63 (May 9, 1977); Victor Zorza, “A Man to Out-Kissinger Kissinger,” Washington Post (January 19, 1977), p. 23;

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Stang, “Zbig Brother,” American Opinion 21 (February 1978):99;

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Bettiga, “Jimmy Who? and Zbigniew Who?” Survey 22 (Summer/Autumn 1976):20;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herman Nickel, “Why Zbig is Not Quite on Top of the World,” Fortune 99 (April 23, 1979):71; Ernest Conine, “Foreign Policy Under President Carter,” Los Angeles Times (August 20, 1976), p. 7;

    Google Scholar 

  14. David Butler and others, “An Exodus from Zbig,” Newsweek 93 (June 9, 1979):71; “A Hard-liner on Russia, Who Will Fill Key White House Post?” U.S. News and World Report 81 (December 27, 1976):29;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings Bruce, “Chinatown: Foreign Policy and Elite Realignment,” in The Hidden Election, ed. Thomas Ferguson and Joel Rogers (New York: Pantheon Books, 1981), pp. 196–231.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Many of their conceptions were also a product of general life experience and upbringing, not necessarily their academic experience. Bruce Mazlish, Kissinger: The European Mind in American Policy (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dana Ward, “Kissinger: A Psychohistory,” in Henry Kissinger: His Personality and Policies, ed. Dan Caldwell (Durham, N.C.: Duke Press Policy Studies, 1983), pp. 24–63.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander L. George, “The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making,” International Studies Quarterly 13 (June 1969):190–222. See pp. 201–5 for philosophical questions and pp. 205–16 for instrumental questions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., pp. 216–21; and “The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-making Behavior: The ‘Operational Code’ Belief System,” in Psychological Models in International Politics, ed. Lawrence S. Falkowski (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979), p. 99; Also see Loch K. Johnson, “Operational Codes and the Prediction of Leadership Behavior: Senator Frank Church at Midcareer,” in A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders, eds. Margaret G. Hermann with Thomas W. Milburn (New York: The Free Press, 1977), pp. 109–13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ole R. Holsti, “The ‘Operational Code’ Approach to the Study of Political Leaders: John Foster Dulles’ Philosophical and Instrumental Beliefs,” p. 153, Canadian Journal of Political Science 3:1 (March 1970). George, “The ‘Operational Code’,” p. 200; Harvey Starr, Henry Kissinger: Perceptions of International Politics (Lexington, KY: The University of Kentucky Press, 1984), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ole R. Holsti, “Foreign Policy Formation Viewed Cognitively.” In Structure of Decision, ed. Robert Axelrod (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976), pp. 18–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stephen R. Graubard, Kissinger: Portrait of a Mind (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1973), p. 6. In his discussion of Kissinger’s undergraduate thesis, “The Meaning of History: Reflections on Spengler, Toynbee and Kant,” Graubard observes, “Much of what he learned at Harvard was incorporated into a thesis that pretended to deal with selected philosophies of history since the eighteenth century; it was, in fact, a kind of personal testament.”

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harvey Starr, “The Kissinger Years: Studying Individuals and Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly 24:4 (December 1980), p. 474, and in Henry Kissinger, p. 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Gerry Argyris Andrianopoulos

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrianopoulos, G.A. (1991). Introduction. In: Kissinger and Brzezinski. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21741-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics