Some Psychological Bases of the Institution of War
Attention is focused upon an important perspective if war is to be thought of as an institution. The Oxford English Dictionary describes the use of the word ‘institution’ in a number of ways which include
an established law, custom, usage, practice, organization or other element in the political or social life of a people.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- S.E. Asch (1951) ‘Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements’, in Groups, Leadership and Men, edited by H. Guetzkow (Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press).Google Scholar
- P. Bateson (1989) ‘Is aggression instinctive?’, in Aggression and War: Their Biological and Social Bases, edited by J. Groebel and R.A. Hinde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 35–47.Google Scholar
- F.E. Fiedler (1964) ‘A contingency model of leadership effectiveness’, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1, edited by L. Berko-witz (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
- J. Panskeep (1980) ‘Opiates and Social Dependence’, in Endogenous and Exogenous Opiate Agonists and Antagonists, edited by E.L. Way (New York: Pergamon Press) 561–4.Google Scholar
- M.K. Roper (1975) ‘Evidence of warfare in the Near East from 10 000 to 4300 B.C.’, in War, its Causes and Correlates, edited by M.A. Nettleship (The Hague: Mouton) 299–343.Google Scholar
- V.H. Vroom and P.W. Yetton (1973) Leadership and Decision Making (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
© Robert A. Hinde 1992