Skip to main content

Defence Decision-making and Accountability

  • Chapter
The Institution of War
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

The way in which a decision is made is a most significant factor in the nature of the decision produced. The British Ministry of Defence is no exception. For the past nine years the Oxford Research Group has studied the structures and processes of defence decision-making in Britain1 and has analysed the roles and influence of the various communities involved.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • McLean, S. (ed.) (1986) How Nuclear Weapons Decisions are Made (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, H. (1987) Nuclear Weapons, Who’s in Charge? (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbothaur, O. (1989) Modernising NATO’s Nuclear Weapons (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Robert A. Hinde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elworthy, S. (1992). Defence Decision-making and Accountability. In: Hinde, R.A. (eds) The Institution of War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21707-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics