Abstract
David Hume (1711–76) described the question of liberty and necessity as ‘the most contentious question of metaphysics, the most contentious science’.1 He was right about it being contentious. Whether it is metaphysical is another matter. I think that what is genuinely metaphysical is an assumption that Hume, and a good many other philosophers, make in their treatment of the question. The assumption is about language and reality. I call it ‘the conformity assumption’. But more about that shortly. Let us begin at the obvious beginning, by considering what the terms ‘liberty’ and ‘necessity’ mean in the expression ‘liberty and necessity’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
D. Hume, ‘An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding’ (1748) in Hume’s Enquiries, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.); revisions P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).
R. Descartes, A Discourse on Method, Meditations on First Philosophy, Principles of Philosophy (1637, 1641, 1644), tr. J. Veitch, intro. A. D. Lindsay (London: J. M. Dent, 1912), p. 179.
Plato, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds.) (New York: Pantheon, 1961), Timaeus, 46c-48c.
Aristotle, The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. and intro. R. McKeon (New York: Random House, 1941), Physics, 198b17.
T. Hobbes, The Leviathan (1651), intro. A. D. Lindsay (London: J. M. Dent, 1914), pp. 12–13.
J. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), ed. and intro. J. W. Yolton (London: J. M. Dent, 1961), bk. III, ch. ii, sect. 7.
G. Campbell, The Philosophy of Rhetoric (1776), 7th edn (London: William Baynes, 1823), p. 47.
C. M. Weis (ed.) Boswell in Extremes 1776–1778 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1790) p. 11.
N. Malebranche, The Search after Truth (1674–1675) tr. T. M. Lennon and P. J. Olscamp (Ohio State University Press, 1980) pp. 448–500.
D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888) pp. 165–6.
D. Hartley, Observations of Man, His Frame, His Duty and His Expectations (1749), 4th edn (London: J. Johnson, 1801) vol. I, p. 502.
J. S. Mill, A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive (1843) (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1893) bk. VI, ch. ii, sect. 2.
A. Tucker, The Light of Nature Pursued (1768) (London: Thomas Tegg and Son, 1837) vol. I, p. 38.
R. Descartes, Descartes: Philosophical Letters, tr. and ed. A. Kenny (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970) p. 243.
G. Berkeley, Philosophical Works, intro. and notes M. R. Ayers (London: J. M. Dent, 1975) p. 331.
M. Black, ‘Making Something Happen’, in S. Hook (ed.) Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science (New York: Macmillan, 1961).
R. M. Chisholm, ‘Human Freedom and the Self’ (1964), in G. Watson (ed.) Free Will (Oxford University Press, 1982).
A. Kolnai, ‘Agency and Freedom’ in G. N. A. Vesey (ed.) The Human Agent, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, vol. I, 1966/7 (London: Macmillan, 1968).
R. Taylor, Action and Purpose (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966).
J. Yolton, ‘Agent Causality’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 3 (1966)
I. Thalberg, ‘Do We Cause Our Own Actions?’, Analysis, 27 (1967).
D. Davidson, ‘Agency’ (1968), in R. Binkley, R. Bronaugh and A. Marras (eds.), Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).
F. H. Bradley, The Principles of Logic (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1883) p. 280.
J. J. Katz, The Philosophy of Language (New York: Harper & Row, 1966) pp. 83, 103.
L. Wittgenstein, The Blue and Brown Books (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958) p. 5.
L. Wittgenstein, Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, G. H. von Wright and Heikki Nyman (eds.); tr. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980) vol. II, sects. 200–266.
J. Bennett, Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971) pp. 1–11.
L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, tr. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953) pt. I, paras. 23, 25 and 31 ff.
L. Wittgenstein, Zettel, G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (eds), tr. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967) para. 320.
P. F. Strawson, ‘Freedom and Resentment’, in G. Watson (ed.) Free Will (Oxford University Press, 1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Godfrey Norman Agmondisham Vesey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vesey, G. (1991). Hume on Liberty and Necessity. In: Inner and Outer. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21639-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21639-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21641-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21639-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)