Skip to main content
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

They had something to celebrate, so it was quite a party. A small research team in the North-west had upstaged Silicon Valley and had given the company a competitive edge with their refinement of the laser zapping of silicon chips. They were also drinking to build up their Dutch courage to help them endure a congratulatory speech by an executive from Headquarters. The speech took its predictable course: perfunctory appreciation; an acknowledgement of their world lead amongst laser zappers; an acknowledgement of the lead they had shown to other research teams within the company. The executive knew little about the technicalities of laser zapping but he considered himself an expert on the subject of leadership — the country needs more strong leaders… leaders are born not made… a leader must inspire awe in others… a leader must ruthlessly rivet everyone’s attention to the objectives and make sure that there is no faltering or slacking until the goal is reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References for Chapter 10

  • Blake, R. R. and Mouton, J. S. (1964) The Management Grid, Gulf Publishing Co., Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978) Transformational Leadership, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J. (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. In Straw, B. M. and Salanick, G. R. (eds), New directions in organisational behaviour St. Clair, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. C. (1969) Psychology and Effective Behaviour, Scott Foresman, Glenview, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, F., Grean, G. and Haga, W. (1975) ‘A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organisations’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. E. (1989) ‘The effective utilisation of intellectual abilities and job relevant knowledge in group performance:cognitive resource theory and an agenda for the future’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38, 3, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. (1959) ‘The bases of social power’, in Cartwright, D. (ed) Studies in Social Power, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, A. W. and Winer, B. J. (1957) ‘A factorial study of leader behaviour description’, Stodgill, R. M. and Coons, A. E. (eds.) Leader Behaviour: its Description and Measurement, Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. K. and Coons, A. E. (1957) ‘Development of the Leader Behaviour Description Questionnaire’, in Stodgill, R. M. and Coons (eds.) Leader Behaviour: its Description and Measurement, Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1985) Research contrasting the behaviour and effect of reputed charismatic versus non-charismatic US Presidents, presented at Annual General meeting of the Administrative Science Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. and Baetz, M. L. (1979) Leadership: some empirical generalizations and new research directions. In Straw, B. (ed.) Research in organisational behaviours (vol 1) J A. I Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. and Mitchell, T. (1974) Path-goal theory of leadership, Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. and Singh, J. V. (1987) ‘Organisational behaviour: some new directions for I/O Psychology’, Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 669–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J. (1985) Psychology of Work Behaviour, Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R. K. (1939) ‘Patterns of Aggressive Behaviour in Experimentally created Social Climates’, Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1961) New Patterns of Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L. and Alliger, G. M. (1986) ‘A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: an application of validity generalisation procedures’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D. (1959) ‘A review of the relationships between personality in small groups’, Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. (1986) ‘Self leadership:towards an expanded theory of self influence processes in organisations’, Academy of Management Review. 11, 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of the Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. H., Hartke, D. D. and Pohlmann, J. T. (1985) ‘Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership: an application of the meta-analysis procedures of Schmidt and Hunter’, Psychological Bulletin. 97, 2, 274–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stodgill, R. M. (1948) ‘Personal factors associated with leadership: a review of the literature’, Journal of Psychology, 25, 35–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, R. and Schmidt, W. H. (1958) ‘How to choose a leadership Pattern’, Harvard Business Review, 36, 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. and Yetton, P. (1973) Leadership and Decision Making, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Mike Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, M. (1991). Leadership and Supervision. In: Smith, M. (eds) Analyzing Organizational Behaviour. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21542-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics