Abstract
‘The language of poetry naturally falls in with the language of power.’ So Hazlitt, in his essay on ‘Coriolanus’, underlined the political analogy which is implied by much of romantic criticism. The poetic imagination aggrandises and dominates; its possessor commands and holds sway over the emotions of his readers. The analogy is double-edged. Though intended as a ringing affirmation of the poet’s authority, it frequently expresses his underlying impotence. Coleridge, for example, sounds slightly peevish as he manipulates the concept of power in the following remarks:
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1991 Patrick Parrinder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parrinder, P. (1991). The Romantic Critics. In: Authors and Authority. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21479-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21479-2_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-43295-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21479-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)