Advertisement

Patriotism and the Idea of Citizenship in Postwar British Politics

  • Paul Rich

Abstract

‘We are always’, the eminent Whig historian G. M. Trevelyan once wrote, ‘throwing over our national traditions, in every thing except politics’1. This chapter will examine the ‘throwing over’ of one such tradition, that of patriotism and its relationship to the conception of citizenship in British politics. This can be seen as part of a wider movement in both European and international politics from the end of the nineteenth century towards a sharper legal definition of the frontiers of citizenship. As a recent volume of essays has pointed out, debates about citizenship are in essence debates about nationhood and what it means to belong to a national grouping.2 In the case of British nationhood, the issue became bound up with ideas from the late Victorian era for a wider conception of imperial citizenship linked to other countries and colonies of settlement of ‘English-speaking peoples’.3 This ideal had a remarkable tenacity in British politics, given the erosion of British power on the world stage by the end of the Second World War.

Keywords

British Nationality British Subject Immigration Control Daily Telegraph British Citizenship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    G. M. Trevelyan, An Autobiography and other Essays (London: Longmans, 1949), p. 57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    William Rogers Brubaker, ‘Introduction’, in William Rogers Brubaker (ed.), Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America (New York and London: Lanham, 1989), p. 3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, A. V. Dicey, ‘A Common Citizenship for the English Race’, The Contemporary Review 71 (April 1897).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The literature on nativism in the US is extensive. See in particular John Higham, ‘Another look at Nativism’, Catholic Historical Review, 44 (1958), 151–88; Strangers in The Land: Patterns of American Nativism,1860–1925 (New York: Athenäum, 1978);Google Scholar
  5. Bronwen J. Cohen, ‘Nativism and Western Myth: The Influence of Nativist Ideas on the American Self Image’, American Studies, 8, 1 (1974), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    See Paul Foot, Immigration and Race in British Politics (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1965), p. 125 for this view.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ann Dummett, ‘Nationality and Immigration Status’, in Ann Dummett (ed.), Towards a Just Immigration Policy (London: The Cobden Trust, 1986), p. 146.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sir Edward Grigg, The Greatest Experiment in History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1924), p. 4.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    D. Cameron Watt, Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain’s Place 1900–1975, (London: Macmillan, 1986), pp. 187–200.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    W. K. Hancock, Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, Volume I: Problems of Nationality 1900–1936, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937), p. 12.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    The world moves fast’, wrote one such writer, ‘and in matters of opinion it moves faster in the English world outside England than it does in England itself’, W. A. McArthur, ‘The Imperial Aspect’, in Arnold White (ed.), The Destitute Alien in Great Britain (London: Swan Sonnenschien, 1982), p. 132.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    See also Charles Price, ‘“White” Restrictions on “Coloured” immigration’, Race, VII (1966), 217–34;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    Robert Huttenbach, Racism and Empire: White Settlers and Colonial Immigration in British Self Governing Colonies 1830–1910 (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Paul B. Rich, Race and Empire in British Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 122–30.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    John Darwin, Britain and Decolonisation: The Retreat From Empire in the Post War World (London: Macmillan, 1988), p. 174.Google Scholar
  16. See also R. F. Holland, European Decolonisation (London: Macmillan, 1985).Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Sir Edward Grigg, The Faith of an Englishman (London: Macmillan, 1936), pp. 242–4.Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    H. V. Hodson, ‘A Distintegrating Bill’, The Round Table, 38, 151 (June 1948), 657–663.Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    Ibid., col 410. John Rex and Sally Tomlinson have argued that the Conservative opposition attached an almost mystical significance to the notion of a tie of personal allegiance to the monarch implied in the term ‘British subject’, Colonial Immigrants in a British City (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p. 48. The attachment lay though in the developing doctrines of Commonwealth since it was the 1931 Statute of Westminster, to which the Conservative leadership at this time was attached. The monarchy, too, gained growing political significance as a symbol of national unity in the postwar era of national decline.Google Scholar
  20. See David Cannadine, ‘The context, performance and meaning of ritual: the British monarchy and the invention of tradition’, 1820–1977’, in Eric Hobsbawn and Terence Ranger (eds), The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 149–60.Google Scholar
  21. 30.
    Tom Clarke, ‘Where is the Commonwealth Going?’, New Statesman, July 1951, p. 16.Google Scholar
  22. 33.
    Patrick Gordon Walker, ‘The Commonwealth Today’, United Empire XLI (November-December 1950), 334.Google Scholar
  23. 40.
    DO 35/5056 P. Swinton to O. Lyttelton 18 March 1953; CAB 129/71 Memorandum by Sec. of State for Comm. Rel., ‘Commonwealth Membership’, 11 October 1954, para. 3. For Swinton’s workat the CRO see Anthony Seldon, Churchill’s Indian Summer: The Conservative Government 1951–1955 (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1981), pp. 338–40.Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    Zig Layton-Henry, The Politics of Race in Britain (London: Allen and Unwin, 1984), pp. 60–64.Google Scholar
  25. 48.
    Crossbow January-March 1963, p. 6. For a discussion on the debates within the Conservative Party during this period see Andrew Gamble, The Conservative Nation (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974), p. 76, pointing out that the Bow Group recognised that there was a severe crisis within Britain in the early 1960s.Google Scholar
  26. 49.
    J. Rodden, ‘The Rope That Connects Me Directly With You’, Albion 20, 1 (1988), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 50.
    Anthony Hartley, A State of England (London: Hutchinson, 1963), p. 43.Google Scholar
  28. 51.
    Paul B. Rich, ‘A matter of life and death to England: patriotism and the British intellectuals, c. 1886–1945’, New Community 15, 4 (July 1989), 491–508.Google Scholar
  29. 52.
    V. S. Anand and F. A. Ridley, The Enigma of Enoch Powell: An Essay in Political Realism (London: Mellissa Press, 1969), p. 14.Google Scholar
  30. 53.
    For Powell’s impact on the debate on British national identity see Paul B. Rich, ‘Conservative Ideology and Race in Modern British Politics’, in Zig Layton-Henry and Paul B. Rich (eds), Race, Government and Politics in Britain (London: Macmillan, 1986), pp. 45–72;Google Scholar
  31. Paul B. Rich, ‘British Imperial Decline and the Forging of English Patriotic Memory, 1918–1968’, History of European Ideas, 9, 6 (1988), 659–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 54.
    J. Solomos et al., ‘The Organic Crisis of British Capitalism and Race’, in C.C.C.S., The Empire Strikes Back (London: Heinemann, 1982), pp. 12–15;Google Scholar
  33. David Dixon, ‘Thatcher’s People: The British Nationality Act 1981’, Journal of Law and Society 10, 2 (Winter 1983), 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 62.
    Paul Sieghart, ‘Becoming British Citizens — more or less’, Daily Telegraph, 27 April 1981.Google Scholar
  35. 67.
    Gill Seidel, ‘Culture, Nation and “Race” in the British and French New Right’, in Ruth Levitas (ed.), The Ideology of the New Right (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986), pp. 107–35; Paul B. Rich, ‘Conservative Ideology and Race in Modern British Politics’.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ursula Vogel and Michael Moran 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Rich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations