Neoclassical Synthesis

  • Olivier Jean Blanchard
Part of the The New Palgrave book series (NPA)

Abstract

The term ‘neoclassical synthesis’ appears to have been coined by Paul Samuelson to denote the consensus view of macroeconomics which emerged in the mid-1950s in the US. To quote from the third edition of Economics (1955, p. 212):

In recent years 90 per cent of American Economists have stopped being ‘Keynesian economists’ or ‘anti-Keynesian economists’. Instead they have worked toward a synthesis of whatever is valuable in older economics and in modern theories of income determination. The result might be called neoclassical economics and is accepted in its broad outlines by all but about 5 per cent of extreme left wing and right wing writers.

Keywords

Depression Europe Income Schizophrenia Milton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Baumol, W.J. 1952. The transactions demand for cash. Quarterly Journal of Economics 66, November, 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fischer, S. 1977. Long-term contracts, rational expectations, and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of Political Economy 85(1), February, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. 1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  4. Hansen, A. 1949. Monetary Theory and Fiscal Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Hicks, J. 1937. Mr Keynes and the ‘classics’: a suggested interpretation. Econometrica 5, April, 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lucas, R. 1980. Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12(4), Part 2, November, 696–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucas, R. and Sargent, T. 1983. After Keynesian macroeconomics. In After the Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment, Federal Reserve of Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Metzler, L. 1951. Wealth, saving and the rate of interest. Journal of Political Economy 59, April, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Modigliani, F. 1944. Liquidity preference and the theory of interest and money. Econometrica 12, January, 45–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Modigliani, F. 1980. Collected Papers. Vol. 1: Essays in Macroeconomics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. 1954. Utility analysis and the consumption function: an interpretation of cross section data. In Post-Keynesian Economics, ed. K.K. Kurihara, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Patinkin, D. 1948. Price flexibility and full employment. American Economic Review 38, September, 543–64.Google Scholar
  13. Patinkin, D. 1956. Money, Interest and Prices. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Phelps, E. 1972. Inflation Policy and Unemployment Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Samuelson, P. 1951. Principles and rules in modern fiscal policy: a neoclassical reformulation. In Money, Trade and Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of John Henry Williams, ed. H.L. Waitzman, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Samuelson, P. 1955. Economics. 3rd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, J. 1980. Aggregate dynamics and staggered contracts. Journal of Political Economy 88(1), February, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tobin, J. 1956. The interest-elasticity of transactions demand for cash. Review of Economics and Statistics 38, August, 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tobin, J. 1958. Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Review of Economic Studies 25, February, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Jean Blanchard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations