Abstract
It is often said that Malthus was a better historian than prophet. He would be disappointed in that verdict because his intention in formulating his Theory of Population was to create a scientific basis for predicting the future state of mankind, in opposition to the speculations of utopian writers, especially Godwin. His failure to predict the Industrial Revolution is the evidence most often brought against him. But even with the benefit of hindsight, economic historians today still find it difficult to predict the Industrial Revolution from its antecedents. The crucial contribution of Malthus’s theory was not its pessimism about innovation but rather its prediction of the demographic consequences of technological change and the inevitable effect of population on the standard of living. Malthus’s Theory of Population continues to influence economic thought from popular discussion to policy-making, to model-building — long after many of its classical contemporaries, like the labour theory of value, have passed from the scene.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Bibliography
Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Easterlin, R.A. 1973. Relative economic status and the American fertility swing. In Family Economic Behavior: Problems and Prospects, ed. E.B. Sheldon, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
Hatcher, J. 1977. Plague, Population, and the English Economy, 1348–1530. London: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, R.D. 1981. Short-term variation: vital rates, prices, and weather. In Wrigley and Schofield (1981), ch. 9.
Malthus, T.R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it affects the future improvement of society. With remarks on the speculations of Mr Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970; 7th edn, New York: Kelley 1970.
Meuvret, J. 1946. Les crises des subsistances et la démographie de la France de l’Ancien Régime. Population 1(4), November, 643–50.
Mokyr, J. 1983. Why Ireland Starved. London: Allen & Unwin.
Preston, S. H. 1976. Mortality Patterns in National Populations. New York: Academic Press.
Weir, D.R. 1984. Rather never than late: celibacy and age at marriage in English cohort fertility, 1541–1871. Journal of Family History 9(4), Winter, 340–54.
Wrigley, E.A. and Schofield, R. 1981. The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weir, D.R. (1991). Malthus’s Theory of Population. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) The World of Economics. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_52
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-55177-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21315-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)