Left Realism in Criminology and the Return to Consensus Theory

  • Kevin Stenson
  • Nigel Brearley
Part of the Explorations in Sociology book series (EIS)

Abstract

The recasting of the knowledge base of social democracy has involved the use of the term ‘realism’ in a number of policy areas. In criminology, a social democratic, or ‘left’ realism has been developed by a group of intellectuals, in sympathy with the parties of the social democratic left, who seek to challenge the hegemony in left discourses of Marxist and neo-Marxist analyses of crime and the justice system. In their view, the left’s misuse of notions of moral panic (Hall et al., 1978), suggesting that the police, courts and mass media have exaggerated the incidence of crimes like mugging, has led to a serious underestimation of the scale of the problem of intra-class street crime for working-class people and the non-working poor. Street assaults and robberies, burglaries, sexual attacks and so on, in decayed inner-city neighbourhoods and poor housing estates are demoralising and are a key element in the social disorganisation of working-class ‘communities’, already suffering from a multiplicity of economic and social deprivations, including a marked vulnerability to the effects of white-collar crime (Lea and Young, 1984).

Keywords

Heroin Fenton Metaphor Milton Dole 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BOX, S. (1981) Deviance, Reality and Society, London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. BREWER, C. et al. (1981) Criminal Welfare On Trial, London: Social Affairs Unit.Google Scholar
  3. CLARKE, R. and CORNISH, D. (1983) Crime Control In Britain, Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  4. COHEN, S. (1985) Visions Of Social Control, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. COHEN, S. and SCULL, A. (eds) (1983) Social Control and the State, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. CORRIGAN, P. et al. (1988) Socialism, Merit and Efficiency, London: The Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  7. CORRIGAN, P. et al. (1989) ‘Rights and Obligations’, New Sorialist, 59.Google Scholar
  8. CURRIE, E. (1985a) ‘Crime and The Conservatives’, Dissent (Fall).Google Scholar
  9. CURRIE, E. (1985b) Confronting Crime: An American Challenge, New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  10. DONZELOT, J. (1979) The Policing of Families, Welfare Versus the State, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  11. DOWNES, D. and ROCK, P. (1988) Understanding Deviance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. DURKHEIM, E. (1953) Sociology and Philosophy, London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
  13. DURKHEIM, E. (1961) Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education, London: The Free Press, Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. ECCLESHALL, R. el al. (1984) Political Ideologies, An Introduction,London: Hutchinson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FACTOR, F. and STENSON, K. (1988a) ‘Identity Crisis’, Youth In Society,(June).Google Scholar
  16. FACTOR, F. and STENSON, K. (1988b) ‘Constructing an Identity’, Youth in Society, (July).Google Scholar
  17. FACTOR, F. and STENSON, K. (1989) ‘Community Control and the Policing of Jewish Youth’, Paper presented to the British Criminological Conference, Bristol Polytechnic, July.Google Scholar
  18. FOUCAULT, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. FOUCAULT, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. GARLAND, D. (1985) Punishment and Welfare, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  21. HALL, S. el al. (1978) Policing the Crisis,London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. HARGREAVES, D. (1979) ‘Durkheim, Deviance and Education’, in L. Barton and R. Meighan, Schools, Pupils and Deviance, Naflerton: Studies in Education.Google Scholar
  23. HAWKINS, M. J. (1977) ‘A Re-Examination of Durkheim’s Theory of Human Nature’, Sociological Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 229–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. HIRSCHI, T. (1969) Causes of Delinquency, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. HIRSCHI, A. VON (1976) Doing justice: The Choice of Punishments, Report of the Committee for the Study of Incarceration, New York.Google Scholar
  26. HIRST, P. Q. (1975) ‘Marx and Engels on Law, Crime and Morality’, in I. Taylor et al. (eds), Critical Criminology, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. HIRST, P. Q. (1980) ‘Law, Socialism and Rights’, in P. Carlen and M. Collinson (eds), Radical Issues in Criminology, Oxford: Mart in Robertson.Google Scholar
  28. HIRST, P. Q. (1986) Law, Socialism and Democracy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. HULSMAN, L. (1986) ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’, Contemporary Crises, vol. 10, pp. 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. JONES, T. et al. (1986) The Islington Crime Survey, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  31. JONES, T. et al. (1987) Saving the Inner City, The first report of the Broadwater Farm Survey, London: Mddx. Polytechnic Centre for Criminology.Google Scholar
  32. KING, M. (1989) ‘Social Crime Prevention à la Thatcher’, The Howard Journal, vol. 28, no. 4.Google Scholar
  33. KINSEY, R. (1984) First repart of the Merseyside Crime Survey, Liverpool, Merseyside County Council.Google Scholar
  34. KINSEY, R. et al. (1986) Losing The Fight Against Crime, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. LITA, J. (1987) ‘Left Realism: A Defence’, Contemporary Crises, 11, pp. 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. LEA, J. and YOUNG, J. (1984) What Is To Be Done About Law and Order?, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. LUKES, S. (1973) Emile Durkheim, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. MARQUAND, D. (1988) The Unprincipled Society, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  39. MATTHEWS, R. (1987) ‘Taking Realist Criminology Seriously’, Contemporary Crises, 11, pp. 371–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MATZA, D. (1969) Becoming Deviant, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. MILLER, P. and ROSE, N. (1988) ‘The Tavistock Programme: The Government of Subjectivity and Social Life’, Sociology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MORGAN, P. (1981) ‘The Children’s Act: Sacrificing Justice to Social Workers’ Needs?’, in C. Brewer et al.Google Scholar
  43. MORRIS, A. et al. (1980) justice for Children, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NORTON, P. and AUGHEY, A. (1981) Conservatives and Conservatism, London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  45. PAINTER, K. el al. (1989) ‘Hammersmith and Fulham Crime and Policing Survey’, Enfield, Middlesex Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  46. PEARCE, F. (1989) The Radical Durkheim, London: Unw in Hyman.Google Scholar
  47. PLATT, T. and TAKAGI, P. (1977) ‘Intellectuals for Law and Order: A Critique of the New Realists’, Crime and Social justice, (Fall—Winter) pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  48. PRYCE, K. (1977) Endless Pressure, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  49. RANDALL, J. H. (1965) The Career of Philosoply, vol. 2, Ncw York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. REINER, R. (1984) ‘Crime, Law and Deviance: The Durkheimian Legacy’, in S. Fenton, Durkheim and Modern Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. ROCK, P. (1979) The Making of Symbolic Inleractionism, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. ROJEK, C. et al. (1988) Social Work and Received Ideas, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. ROSE, N. (1985) The Psychological Complex, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. SCHUR, E. (1973) Radical Non-Interventionism: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. SCRATON, P. (ed.) (1987) Law, Order and The Authoritarian State, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  56. STENSON, K. (1986) ‘Foucault, Policing and the Body’, Paper presented to the National Deviancy Conference, Central London Polytechnic, March.Google Scholar
  57. STENSON, K. (1988) Review of Walker, N. ‘Crime and Criminology, A Critical Introduction’, Sociology, vol. 11, no. 2.Google Scholar
  58. STENSON, K. and BREARLEY, N. (1989) ‘Realism, Crime and Ethics’, Paper presented to the British Sociological Association Conference, 1989.Google Scholar
  59. STUBBS, P. (1987) ‘Crime, Community and the Multi-Agency Approach: A critical reading of the Broadwater Farm Inquiry Report’, Critical Social Policy, 20, pp. 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. TAYLOR, I. et al. (1973) The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of Deviance, London: RKP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. THORPE, D. et al. (1980) Out of Care, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  62. VAN DEN HAAG, E. (1985) Deterring Potential Criminals, London: Social Affairs Unit, Research Report no. 7.Google Scholar
  63. VORHAUS, G. (1984) Police in the Classroom — A Study of the Schools Involvement Programme in Hillingdon, Hillingdon Legal Resource Centre, Hayes.Google Scholar
  64. WALKER, N. (1987) Crime and Criminology: A Critical Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. WEST, D and FARRINGTON, D. (1977) The Delinquent Way of Life, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  66. WILSON, J. Q. (1975) Thinking About Crime, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  67. YOUNG, J. (1971) The Drugtakers, London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
  68. YOUNG, J. (1987a) ‘The Tasks Facing A Realist Criminology’, Contemporary Crises, 11, pp. 337–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. YOUNG, J. (1987b) ‘Deviance’, in P. Worsley (ed.) The New Introducing Sociology, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  70. YOUNG, J. (1988) ‘Radical Criminology Li Britain: The Emergence of A Competing Paradigm’, in P. Rock (ed.), A History of British Criminology, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Stenson
  • Nigel Brearley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations