Skip to main content

Super Pragmatic Paradoxes

  • Chapter
Logical Foundations
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

I think of Dan O’Connor when I do my major weekly grocery shopping, and check out under a sign that begins like this:1

Blodgett’s Supermarket wants you to enjoy shopping here. In fact, we insist that you do…

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D.J. O’Connor, ‘Pragmatic Paradoxes’, Mind, Vol. 57, (1948) pp. 358–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See L.J. Cohen, ‘Mr O’Connor’s “Pragmatic Paradoxes”’, Mind, Vol. 59, (1950) pp. 85–7,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Alexander, ‘Pragmatic Paradoxes’, Mind, Vol. 59, (1950) pp. 536–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. , and D.J. O’Connor, ‘Pragmatic Paradoxes and Fugitive Propositions’, Mind, Vol. 60, (1951) pp. 536–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. V. Quine, ‘On a So-called Paradox’, Mind, Vol. 62, (1953) pp.65–7. Curiously, the paradox drives Quine to a serious consideration of possibility in the discussion.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See Brian Medlin, ‘An Unexpected Examination’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 1, (1964) pp. 66–72. The remark about Quine is on p. 66, where Medlin also says: ‘Several philosophers have discussed this problem in Mind. Of these, we must put Mr. Shaw first and the rest nowhere.’ One feels nostalgic for the kinder and gentler standards of debate of the preceding decade.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stephen Stich, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science (Boston: MIT Press, 1983), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ackermann, R. (1991). Super Pragmatic Paradoxes. In: Mahalingam, I., Carr, B. (eds) Logical Foundations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21232-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics