Psychoanalysis and Political Literary Theories

  • Robert Young
Chapter
Part of the Communications and Culture book series (COMMCU)

Abstract

Psychoanalysis, which could be described as a theory of unhappy relationships, has itself a long history of unhappy relationships. In the first place there is the story of the tense relationships within psychoanalysis between analysts, the psychoanalytic politics that has been charted by Paul Roazen, François Roustang, Sherry Turkle and others.1 In the second place, psychoanalysis has a history of relationships with other disciplines; but while it has always exercised a fascination for other forms of thought in the human sciences, liaisons have tended to be short and not always sweet. You could say that psychoanalysis, though now at the grand old age of 90-odd, still finds it hard to settle down. I want to look at three of those relationships in the sphere of cultural analysis — with literary criticism, with Marxism, and with feminism. For even if it has not yet settled down psychoanalysis has, in the last twenty years, undergone a sort of sea-change and entered into a new kind of relationship that has almost reversed its former identity: that is with politics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Rosalind Coward and John Ellis, Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    René Girard, ‘Tiresias and the Critic’, in Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato (eds), The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man ( Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, 1970 ), p. 17.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Claude Lévi-Strauss, Tristes Tropiques, John and Necke Mander (trans) (Cape, London, 1973 ), p. 71.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Shoshana Felman, ‘To Open the Question’, in S. Felman (ed.), Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Question of Reading: Otherwise, Yale French Studies, nos 55/56 (1977), pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Russell Jacoby, Social Amnesia: A Critique of Conformist Psychology from Adler to Laing (Harvester Press, Hassocks), p. 73.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    See Christopher Caudwell, Illusion and Reality: A Study of the Sources of Poetry (Macmillan, London, 1937); Studies in a Dying Culture ( The Bodley Head, London, 1938 ).Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Georg Lukács, ‘The Ideology of Modernism’, in The Meaning of Contemporary Realism, John and Necke Mander (trans) ( Merlin Press, London, 1963 ), p. 24.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Sebastiano Timpanaro, The Freudian Slip ( New Left Books, London, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    V. N. Voloshinov, Freudianism: A Marxist Critique, I. R. Titunik (trans) ( Academic Press, New York, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Ernesto Laclau, ‘Psychoanalysis and Marxism’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 13, no. 2 (1987), p. 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 15.
    Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, Ben Brewster (trans) (New Left Books, London, 1971 ), p. 177.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as Socially Symbolic Act ( Methuen, London, 1981 ), p. 86.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    Pierre Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, Geoffrey Wall (trans) (Routledge amp; Kegan Paul, London, 1978 ).Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    Terry Eagleton, Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory ( New Left Books, London, 1976 ), pp. 90–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 21.
    Fredric Jameson, ‘Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism’, New Left Review, no. 146 (1984), p. 71.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Lilian S. Robinson, Sex, Class, and Culture ( Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1978 ), p. 115.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    Juliet Mitchell, Psychoanalysis and Feminism (Allen Lane, London, 1974), p. xv.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Juliet Mitchell and Jacqueline Rose, Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne ( Macmillan, London, 1982 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 27.
    Michèle Barrett, Women’s Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis (Verso, London, 1980), pp. 46, 56, 58.Google Scholar
  20. 29.
    Jacqueline Rose, Sexuality in the Field of Vision ( Verso, London, 1986 ), p. 90.Google Scholar
  21. 30.
    Cora Kaplan, Sea Changes: Essays on Culture and Feminism ( Verso, London, 1986 ), pp. 152–3.Google Scholar
  22. 31.
    Jane Gallop, Reading Lacan ( Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1985 ), p. 315.Google Scholar
  23. 32.
    Angela Weir and Elizabeth Wilson, ‘The British Women’s Movement’, New Left Review, no. 148 (1984), p. 97.Google Scholar
  24. 33.
    Perry Anderson, In the Tracks of Historical Materialism ( Verso, London, 1983 ), p. 91.Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    Toril Moi, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory ( Methuen, London, 1985 ), p. 166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert Young 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Young

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations