Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Communications and Culture ((COMMCU))

Abstract

Although it makes no direct reference to Althusser’s essay of 1970, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’,1 Roland Barthes’s essay of 1973, ‘Diderot, Brecht, Eisenstein’, had the effect of spatialising the Althusserian concept of ideology as representation: ‘there will still be representation for so long as a subject (author, reader, spectator or voyeur) casts his gaze towards a horizon on which he cuts out the base of a triangle, his eye (or his mind) forming the apex’.2 Laura Mulvey’s essay of 1975, ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’,3 subsequently theorised the voyeuristic subject of Barthes’s theatrical space in terms of Freudian psychoanalysis. The change across this five-year period is profound. Instead of a contingent set of ideas which might be dissipated by reason, ‘ideology’ was now conceived of in terms of a space of representations which the subject inhabits, a limitless space which the desiring subject negotiates by predominantly unconscious transactions.

‘simple geometrical opposition becomes tinged with aggressivity’

(Bachelard, The Poetics of Space)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Louis Althusser, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes To- wards an Investigation)’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays ( New Left Books, London, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roland Barthes, ‘Diderot, Brecht, Eisenstein’, in Image-Music-Text ( Hill amp; Wang, New York, 1977 ), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laura Mulvey, ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’, Screen, vol. 16, no. 3, Autumn, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish ( Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. M. Cornford, Plato’s Cosmology ( Harcourt Brace, New York, 1937 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Augustine, De Ordine, ch. 15, 42; in, A. Hofstadter and R. Kuhns, Philosophies of Art and Beauty ( University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976 ), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Minkowski, ‘Space and Time’, in, A. Sommerfeld (ed.), The Principle of Relativity (Dodd, Mead amp; Co., New York, 1923 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dziga Vertov, ‘Film Directors, A Revolution’, Lef, vol. 3, in Screen Reader I ( SEFT, London, 1977 ), p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul Virilio, L’Espace Critique ( Christian Bourgeois, Paris, 1984 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Virilio, Speed and Politics, Semiotext(e ), ( New York, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Bolter, Turing’s Man ( Raleigh, University of North Carolina, 1984 ), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle (Black amp; Red, Detroit, 1983), paragraph 167.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacqueline Rose, ‘The Imaginary’, in Sexuality in the Field of Vision ( Verso, London, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacques Lacan, Le Séminaire, livre I: Les écrits techniques de Freud ( Seuil, Paris, 1975 ), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis ( Hogarth, London, 1977 ), p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Freud, ‘“A Child is Being Beaten”: A Contribution to the Study of the Origin of Sexual Perversions’, SE, XVII, pp. 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness ( Washington Square Press, New York, 1966 ), pp. 369–70.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible ( Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill., 1968 ), p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Otto Fenichel, ‘The Scoptophilic Instinct and Identification’, in H. Fenichel and D. Rapaport (eds), The Collected Papers of Otto Fenichel, First Series (Norton, New York, 1953 ), p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Manetti, Vita di Filippo di Ser Brunellesco, Elana Tosca (ed.) (Roma, 1927), pp. 11 ff.; quoted in, John White, The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space ( Faber, London, 1971 ), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sarah Kofman, Camera Obscura de l’Idéologie ( Galilée, Paris, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Catherine Clément, The Lives and Legends of Jacques Lacan ( Columbia University Press, New York, 1973 ), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Julia Kristeva, La révolution du langage poétique ( Seuil, Paris, 1974 ), p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Kristeva, Pouvoirs de l’horreur ( Seuil, Paris, 1980 ), p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Kristeva, Soleil Noir: Dépression et Mélancolie (Gallimard, Paris, 1987), 107ff.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klaus Theweleit, Male Fantasies ( Polity, Cambridge, 1987 ).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Kristeva, ‘Women’s Time’, in Toril Moi (ed.), The Kristeva Reader ( Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986 ), p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

James Donald

Copyright information

© 1991 Victor Burgin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burgin, V. (1991). Geometry and Abjection. In: Donald, J. (eds) Psychoanalysis and Cultural Theory: Thresholds. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21170-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21170-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-46104-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21170-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics