Skip to main content

Reading the Periodical Press: Text and Context

  • Chapter
Investigating Victorian Journalism

Abstract

These words are, of course, not my own preface to an heroic attempt to subject the periodical press to a regular and systematic course of study, but the words of James Mill writing anonymously in the Westminster Review in 1824. Over 150 years later the project announced by Mill did not seem a great deal further advanced when Joanne Shattock and Michael Wolff echoed Mill’s words in their introduction to The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings.

The systematic and general study of [the Victorian periodical] press has hardly begun … for the press as a whole, we appear to have little choice except to be satisfied with a casual or glancing knowledge, believing that anything broader or deeper or more systematic is beyond the bounds of reasonable humanistic ambition… . The sheer bulk and range of the Victorian press seems to make it so unwieldy as to defy systematic and general study… . And yet, despite what prudence and common sense would tell us, a case can be made that the very impenetrability of the Victorian press requires of us that we attempt a systematic and general study?2

It is indeed a subject of wonder, that periodical publications should have existed so long … without having become subject to a regular and systematic course of criticism.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James Mill, ‘Periodical Literature’, WR, I (1824) 206.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joanne Shattock and Michael Wolff (eds), The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings (Leicester, 1982) p. xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Wolff, ‘Comments on AHA Panel’, VPN, no. 11 (1971) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Raymond Williams, The Long Revolution (Harmondsworth, 1965) pp. 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Wolff, ‘Charting the Golden Stream’, VPN, no. 13 (1971) 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walter Houghton (ed.), The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals, vol. I (Toronto and London, 1966) p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John North, ‘The Rationale — Why Read Victorian Periodicals?’, in J. Don Vann and Rosemary T. VanArsdel (eds), Victorian Periodicals: A Guide to Research (New York, 1978) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tony Bennett, ‘Media, “reality”, signification’, in Michael Gurevitch et al. (eds), Culture, Society and the Media (London, 1982) p. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tony Bennett et al., (eds), Culture, Ideology and Social Process (Milton Keynes, 1981) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ‘Culture is Ordinary’ is the title of an early essay by Raymond Williams, in Norman MacKenzie (ed.), Conviction (London, 1958). See Stuart Hall in Bennett et al. (eds), Culture, Ideology and Social Process, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raymond Williams, ‘Crisis in English Studies’, in Writing in Society (London, 1983) p. 210. See also his Marxism and Literature (Oxford, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raymond Williams, ‘The Press and Popular Culture: an historical perspective’, in George Boyce, James Curran and Pauline Wingate (eds), Newspaper History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present Day (London, 1978) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roland Barthes, ‘From Work to Text’, in Image, Music, Text, trans. Stephen Heath (London, 1977) pp. 155–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WR, I (1824) 206.

    Google Scholar 

  15. WR, I (1824) 209.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Althusser defines ideology as ‘a system of representation … perceived-accepted-suffered cultural objects’ which negotiate the ‘“lived” relations between men and the world’. See For Marx, trans. Ben Brewster (London, 1969) p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  17. WR, I (1824) 209.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roland Barthes, Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers (London, 1973) p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See, for example, Michel Foucault, ‘Orders of Discourse’, Social Sciences Information, X (1971) 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.S. Mill, ‘Periodical Literature’, WR, I (1824) 505–41.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michael Foucault, ‘History of Systems of Thought’ in D.F. Bouchard (ed.) Language, Counter-memory, Practice (Ithaca and Oxford, 1977) p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brian Maidment, ‘Magazines of Popular Progress and the Artisans’, VPR, XVII (1984) 85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michael Lund, ‘Novels, Writers and Readers in 1850’, VPR, XVII (1984) 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Raymond Williams, Culture (London, 1981) pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Laurel Brake, Aled Jones, Lionel Madden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pykett, L. (1990). Reading the Periodical Press: Text and Context. In: Brake, L., Jones, A., Madden, L. (eds) Investigating Victorian Journalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20790-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics