Skip to main content
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

In 1963 no right-thinking politician or pundit would have dissented from this judgement: Noel Annan was doing little more than expressing a commonplace thought with uncommon eloquence. The British establishment (political as well as cerebral) subscribed to a progressive consensus which had been invented between the wars (mainly by R. H. Tawney) and revised in the 1950s (notably by Tony Crosland). It wanted to abolish the 11-plus, to expand higher education, and to liberalise teaching; and it regarded education not only as a good in itself but also as a powerful instrument of social reform and public enlightenment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Noel Annan, The Guardian (19 February 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The literature based on these assumptions is immense. For a representative sample see Harold Silver (ed.), Equal Opportunity in Education (London, 1973): 108–259.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Sanderson, Educational Opportunity and Social Change in England (London, 1987): 122–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James S. Coleman, Equality of Educational Opportunity (New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frederick Mosteller and Daniel P. Moynihan, On Equality of Educational Opportunity (New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. G. Cicirelli, ‘The Impact of Head Start on Children’s Cognitive and Affective Development’, Westinghouse Learning Corporation (Washington DC, 1969) (the Westinghouse Report).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christopher Jencks (and Marshall Smith, Henry Acland, Mary Jo Bane, David Cohen, Herbert Gintis, Barbara Heyns, Stephen Michelson), Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family on Schooling in America (New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Julian Le Grand, The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services (London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert E. Goodin and Julian Le Grand, Not Only the Poor: The Middle Classes and the Welfare State (London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charles Murray, Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nathan Glazer, The Limits of Social Policy (Cambridge, Mass., 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. B. Cox and A. E. Dyson, ‘Introduction’, in Cox and Dyson (eds), The Black Papers on Education (London, 1971): 9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. B. Cox and Rhodes Boyson, ‘Background’ Black Paper 1977 (London, 1977): 13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. E. Dyson, ‘Culture and Anarchy. 1869–1969’, The Critical Quarterly (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Amis, ‘Pernicious Participation’, The Black Papers on Education (1971): 172.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Terry Ellis, Jackie McWhirter, Dorothy McDolgan and Brian Haddow, William Tyndale; The Teacher’s Story (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robin Auld QC, William Tyndale Junior and Infants Schools Public Inquiry (July 1976): 274, para. 838.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Neville Bennett, Teaching Styles and Pupil Progress (London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arthur R. Jensen, ‘How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement’, Harvard Educational Review, 39 (1969): 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richard Herrnstein, ‘I.Q.,’, The Atlantic, 228 (1971): 56, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eysenck, Race, Intelligence and Education (London, 1971): 140.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eysenck, ‘The Rise of the Mediocracy’ in Psychology is About People (London, 1972): 160–99.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffrey Gray, ‘Why Should Society Reward Intelligence?’ The Times (8 September 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See, for example, M. Hunt, ‘The intelligent man’s guide to intelligence’, Playboy, 18 (February 1971): 94–6, 106, 191–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Edson, New York Times Magazine (31 August 1969): 10–11. For discussions see 21 and 28 September issues.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen, Genetics and Education (London, 1972): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  27. John W. Meyer, ‘The Charter: Conditions of Diffuse Socialisation in Schools’, in W. Richard Scott, Social Processes and Social Structures: An Introduction to Sociology (New York, 1970) especially 565, 568, 572.

    Google Scholar 

  28. James S. Coleman, The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and its Impact on Education (New York, 1961): 318.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Quoted in Ken Jones, Right Turn: The Conservative Revolution in Education (London, 1989): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For an amusing account of progressive education run wild see Jonathan Miller, ‘Led Astray’, in Brian Inglis (ed.), John Bull’s Schooldays (London, 1961): 101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Quoted in Peter Hennessy, Whitehall (London, 1989): 425.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robert Jackson, ‘The Higher Education Funding Debate: Some Conclusions Drawn’, paper delivered to a Centre for Policy Studies Conference (9 May 1989): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dawn Gill and Les Levidow (eds), Anti-Racist Science Teaching (London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Adrian Wooldridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wooldridge, A. (1990). Education: From Boyle to Baker. In: Clark, J.C.D. (eds) Ideas and Politics in Modern Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20686-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics