Skip to main content

Absolutism and the return of order after 1660

  • Chapter
Seventeenth Century Europe

Part of the book series: History of Europe

  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

The later seventeenth century may be regarded as the period when absolute monarchy reached its classic form. It was in effect the ‘normal’ type of government in Europe for the next century or more. Yet there are relatively few formal statements of constitutional law dating from the period. In 1683, however, the Danish crown promulgated a substantial law code, Danske Lov, whose very first article made clear that the monarch:

alone has supreme authority to draw up laws and ordinances according to his will and pleasure, and to elaborate, change, extend, delimit and even entirely annul laws previously promulgated by himself or his ancestors. He can likewise exempt from the letter of the law whatsoever or whomsoever he wishes. He alone has supreme power and authority to appoint or dismiss at will all officials regardless of their rank, name or title; thus offices and functions of all kinds must derive their authority from the absolute power of the King. He has sole supreme authority over the entire clergy, from the highest to the lowest, in order to regulate church functions and divine service. He orders or prohibits as he sees fit all meetings and assemblies on religious affairs, in accordance with the word of God and the Augsburg Confession. He alone has the right to arm his subjects, to conduct war, and to conclude or abrogate alliances with whomever he wishes at any time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Danske Lov (1683), in my translation; cf. E. Ekman, ‘The Danish Royal Law of 1665’, JMH, 29 (1957), 102–7. The Royal Law remained technically in force until 1848.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This manoeuvre also helped to conceal the greater embarrassment of Mazarin’s own colossal fortune, which it was not in the crown’s interests to reveal. See R. Bonney, ‘The secret expenses of Richelieu and Mazarin, 1624–1661’ EngHR, 91 (1976), 825–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. For the earlier context, see J. Bergin, Cardinal Richelieu: Power and the Pursuit of Wealth (Yale, New Haven, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Beik, Absolutism and Society in Seventeenth-century France (Cambridge, 1985), esp. chs 12–13

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. France in Crisis 1620–1675, ed. P. Coveney (London, 1977), pp. 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Goubert, Louis XIV et 20 millions de français (Paris, 1966; transi. 1970), p. 72, stresses the smallness of the bureaucracy and the wide range of supervisory duties of the intendants over town administration, law courts, finance, army and navy affairs, forestry, grain supplies and trade — particularly burdensome given the inadequacies of the rudimentary police force of only 2000 men for the whole kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quoted in O. Ranum and P. Ranum, The Century of Louis XIV (London, 1972), pp. 111–36, esp. 124.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. T.J. Schaeper, The French Council of Commerce 1700–1715 (Columbus, Ohio, 1983), pp. 59–66, 178–80

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.K.J. Thomson, Clermont-de Lodève 1638–1789 (Cambridge, 1982) discusses an example of an initially highly successful state enterprise

    Google Scholar 

  10. for a survey of the anticipatory ideas of early seventeenth-century French writers, see D. Parker, The Making of French Absolutism (London, 1983), pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.C. Coleman, ‘Mercantilism revisited’, HJ, 23 (1980), 773–91, esp. 790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Wilson, ‘The other face of mercantilism’, in Revisions in Mercantilism, ed. D.C. Coleman (London, 1969), pp. 118–39; for a survey of abortive attempts to introduce further regulation in England,

    Google Scholar 

  13. see C. G. A. Clay, Economic Expansion and Social Change: England 1500–1700 (Cambridge, 1984), vol. 2, pp. 203–50.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Bérenger, Finances et absolutisme autrichienne (Paris, 1975), pp. 275–96, 353–403.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Dessert, Argent, pouvoir et société au Grand Siècle (Paris, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also J. Dent, Crisis in Finance: Crown, Financiers and Society in Seventeenth-century France (Newton Abbot, 1973), esp. pp. 232–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For the attempt to calculate annual incomes and expenditures under Louis XIV, see A. Guéry. Dessert, Argent, pouvoir et société au Grand Siècle (Paris, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also J. Dent, Crisis in Finance: Crown, Financiers and Society in Seventeenth-century France (Newton Abbot, 1973), esp. pp. 232–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For the attempt to calculate annual incomes and expenditures under Louis XIV, see A. Guéry, ‘Les finances de la monarchie française sous lancien régime’, A, 33 (1978), 216–39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. A. Macartney, The Habsburg and Hohenzollern Dynasties (London, 1970), p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Roberts, Sweden as a Great Power 1611–97 (London, 1968), pp. 60f.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a full discussion, see A. F. Upton, ‘The Riksdag of 1680 and the establishment of royal absolutism in Sweden’, EngHR, 102 (1987), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. But as A. F. Upton, ‘Absolutism and the rule of law: the case of Karl XI of Sweden’, Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 8 (1988), 31–46, has demonstrated, no Swedish subject ultimately had any recourse in law against the king himself.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Their criticisms have been followed up by J. Miller, ‘The potential for “absolutism” in later Stuart England’, H, 69 (1984), 187–207. However, the comparison does not bear closer scrutiny: the late Stuarts lacked any effective control of local administration comparable to that achieved through, for instance, the French intendants, and clearly lacked the fiscal and military autonomy of continental monarchs in dealing with domestic resistance.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Thomas Munck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munck, T. (1990). Absolutism and the return of order after 1660. In: Seventeenth Century Europe. History of Europe. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20626-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20626-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-28641-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20626-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics