Skip to main content

The Fallacy of Realism: Some Problems of Masaryk’s Approach to Czech National Aspirations

  • Chapter
T. G. Masaryk (1850–1937)

Part of the book series: Studies in Russia and East Europe ((SREE))

  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

The Czech political movement known as Realism achieved its lasting influence on Czech political minds not so much by its popularity or even real achievements, as by its association with Tomáš G. Masaryk. There is a widespread interpretation of Masaryk’s concept of Realism, which the distinguished biographer and interpreter of Masaryk and his work, W. Preston Warren, puts as follows: ‘The term “realism” was employed by Masaryk to put stresses on the diverse factors which any honest person finds he must consider: the material world, the facts of history, the confirmed findings of science, moral values and principles, functional social orders, valid goals … For Masaryk, realism meant an opposition to mythology (and all pansubjectivism) in the name of reliable and accurate methodology … Better than any other work, however, The Czech Question seems to exemplify what “realism” meant to him.’1 Despite the influence of this interpretation, the following essay intends to challenge it.

The Czech political movement known as Realism achieved its lasting influence on Czech political minds not so much by its popularity or even real achievements, as by its association with Tomáš G. Masaryk. There is a widespread interpretation of Masaryk’s concept of Realism, which the distinguished biographer and interpreter of Masaryk and his work, W. Preston Warren, puts as follows: ‘The term “realism” was employed by Masaryk to put stresses on the diverse factors which any honest person finds he must consider: the material world, the facts of history, the confirmed findings of science, moral values and principles, functional social orders, valid goals … For Masaryk, realism meant an opposition to mythology (and all pansubjectivism) in the name of reliable and accurate methodology … Better than any other work, however, The Czech Question seems to exemplify what “realismȁ meant to him.’1 Despite the influence of this interpretation, the following essay intends to challenge it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Compare T. G. Masaryk, Karel Havliéek: Snahy a tuïby politického probuzeni (Prague: Laichter, 1896); the edition used in this study has been the 3rd (Prague, 1920) pp. 452–504.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. G. Masaryk, Jan Hus, Nase obrozenl a nase reformace (Prague: Cas, 1896). The edition used here is the 3rd (Prague, 1903), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt-Hartmann, E. (1990). The Fallacy of Realism: Some Problems of Masaryk’s Approach to Czech National Aspirations. In: Winters, S.B. (eds) T. G. Masaryk (1850–1937). Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20596-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics