Abstract
For Marx, the labour theory of value was not a theory of price, but a method for measuring the exploitation of labour. The exploitation of labour, in turn, was important for explaining the production of a surplus in a capitalist economy. In a feudal economy, the emergence of a net product, surplus to the consumption of producers and to the inputs consumed in production, was palpable. For the serf reproduced himself on his family plot of land during part of the week, and then worked for the lord, doing demesne or corvee labour during the other part. There was a temporal and physical division between production for subsistence or reproduction, and production which generated an economic surplus and was appropriated by the lord. Under capitalism, with the division of labour, such a demarcation no longer existed. If capitalism is characterized by competitive markets, where each factor is paid its true ‘value’, and no one makes a windfall profit by cheating his partner in exchange, how could a surplus emerge? In what manner could a sequence of equal exchanges transform an initial set of inputs into a larger quantity of outputs, with the surplus being appropriated systematically by one class, the capitalists? Marx’s project was to explain the origin of profits in a perfectly competitive model, where each factor, including labour, received its competitive price in exchange.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bardhan, P. 1984. Land, Labor and Rural Poverty: Essays in Development Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. 1981. Structure and practice in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics 12(4), 1–26.
Cohen, G.A. 1979. The labor theory of value and the concept of exploitation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8(4), Summer, 338–40.
Elster, J. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Geras, N. 1985. The controversy about Marx and justice. New Left Review No. 150, March–April, 47–85.
Marx, K. 1867. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Vol. 1. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1977.
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx’s Economics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roemer, J.E. 1981. Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roemer, J.E. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Roemer, J.E. 1985a. Value, Exploitation, and Class. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Roemer, J.E. 1985b. Should Marxists be interested in exploitation? Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(1), Winter, 30–65.
Samuelson, P. 1982. The normative and positivistic inferiority of Marx’s values paradigm. Southern Economic Journal 49(1), July, 11–18.
Vegara, J. M. 1979. Economia politica y modelos multisectoriales. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
Wright, E.O. 1985. Classes. London: New Left Books. Distributed in U.S.A. by Schocken Books.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roemer, J.E. (1990). Marxian Value Analysis. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Marxian Economics. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20572-1_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20572-1_39
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49545-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20572-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)