Abstract
Induction, in its most general form, is the making of inferences from the observed to the unobserved. Thus, inferences from the past to the future, from a sample to the population, from data to an hypothesis, and from observed effects to unobserved causes are all aspects of induction, as are arguments from analogy. A successful account of induction is required for a satisfactory theory of causality, scientific laws and predictive applications of economic theory. But induction is a dangerous thing, and especially so for those who lean towards empiricism, the view that only experience can serve as the grounds for genuine knowledge. Because induction, by its very nature, goes beyond the observed, its use is inevitably difficult to justify for the empiricist. In addition, inductive inferences differ from deductive inferences in three crucial respects. First, the conclusion of an inductive inference does not follow with certainty from the premises, but only with some degree of probability. Second, whereas valid deductive inferences retain their validity when extra information is added to the premises, inductive inferences may be seriously weakened. Third, whereas there is widespread agreement upon the correct characterization of deductive validity. there is widespread disagreement about what constitutes a correct inductive argument, and indeed whether induction is a legitimate part of science at all.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bacon, F. 1620. Novum Organum. Reprinted as The New Organon, ed. F.H. Anderson. Indianapolis: Bobbs–Merrill, 1960.
Barnett, V. 1982. Comparative Statistical Inference. 2nd edn, Chichester: John Wiley.
Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harrod, R. 1956. Foundations of Inductive Logic. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. L.A. Selby–Bigge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1888.
Humphreys, P. 1985. Why propensities cannot be probabilities. Philosophical Review 94, 557–70.
Jevons, W.S. 1874. The Principles of Science. London: Macmillan.
Keynes, J.M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan; New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
Kneale, W. 1949. Probability and Induction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mill, J.S. 1843. A System of Logic. London: J.W. Parker; New York: Longman’s Green, 1952.
Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson; New York: Basic Books.
Reichenbach, H. 1949. The Theory of Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Simon, H. 1977. Causal ordering and identifiability. In H. Simon, Models of Discovery, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Skyrms, B. 1986. Choice and Chance. 3rd edn, Belmont: Wadsworth.
Swinburne, R. 1974. The Justification of Induction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Humphreys, P.W. (1990). Induction. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Utility and Probability. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49541-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20568-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)