Rome: a City of Rich Contrast

  • Christopher Reynolds
Part of the Man & Music book series

Abstract

There are two popular images of musical life in Renaissance Rome. The Rome of Leo X looms as a vibrant, international arena in which Italian and northern musicians composed and performed in a variety of sacred and secular styles; this contrasts easily — too easily, perhaps — with the image of Rome during the Counter-Reformation as an austere, conservative city, best represented by the uncomplicated devotional music of the lauda and by the controlled polyphony of Palestrina. While the earlier period contributed to the birth of the Italian madrigal, the legacy of the latter was the Baroque oratorio and the stylized ecclesiastical counterpoint of the prima prattica. However, these opposing images are too sharply drawn, the contrast between them oversimplified. As a city Renaissance Rome was too large, its sources of musical patronage too diverse for any one style to dominate. Josquin, the Greek organist Isaaco Argyropulo and the Florentine humanist Aurelio Brandolini were contemporaries in late fifteenth-century Rome, as were Marenzio, Palestrina, Girolamo Mei and S Filippo Neri a century later. Each possessed distinct musical convictions. All of them contributed substantially to the musical life of the city.

Keywords

Burning Migration Europe Income Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    C. Stinger, The Renaissance in Rome (Bloomington, 1985), 146–7 and 289;Google Scholar
  2. and J. D’Amico, Renaissance Humanism in Papal Rome (Baltimore, 1983), pp. xvi and 7.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    P. Portoghesi, Rome of the Renaissance, trans. P. Sanders (London, 1972), 16.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    J. Hale, Italian Renaissance Painting from Massacio to Titian (Oxford, 1977), 36.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    P. Partner, Renaissance Rome 1500–1559: a Portrait of a Society (Berkeley, 1976), 117–18; and for a more detailed description of the curia, see D’Amico, Renaissance Humanism, 19–28.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    This translation is from D. Coffin, The Villa in the Life of Renaissance Rome (Princeton, 1979), 336. He discusses the Villa d’Este on pp.311–38; see also his The Villa d’Este at Tivoli (Princeton, 1960).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    This table is based on lists compiled by P. A. Myers in An Analytical Study of the Italian Cyclic Madrigals Published by Composers Working in Rome ca. 1540–1614 (dins., U. of Illinois, Urbana, 1971), 34–46. I have made additions and corrections to her lists where appropriate.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    See C. Reynolds, ‘Musical Careers, Ecclesiastical Benefices, and the Example of Johannes Brunet’, JAMS, xxxvii (1984) 49–97.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    The quotation is from the papal singer Ghiselin Danckerts; in H. Kaufmann, The Life and Works of Nicola Vicentino (1511 – c.1576), MSD, xi (1966), 22.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    On this style see M. Bradshaw, The Falsobordone (Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1978);Google Scholar
  11. and Bradshaw, Giovanni Luca Conforti: ‘Salmi Passaggiati’ (1601–1603), Miscellanea, v (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    R. Sherr, The Papal Chapel ca. 1492–1513 and its Polyphonic Sources (diss., Princeton U., 1975), 95.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    J. Lionnet, ‘Performance Practice in the Papal Chapel during the 17th Century’, EM xv (1987), 4–15;Google Scholar
  14. R. Sherr, ‘Performance Practice in the Papal Chapel during the Sixteenth Century’, EM xv(1987),453–62. I am grateful to Prof. Sherr for providing me with a copy of his article before it was published.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    G. Martin, Roma sancta (1581), ed. G. B. Parks (Rome, 1969), 101. It is difficult to interpret his report of ‘no descant’, because falsobordone and other types of improvised polyphony are securely documented practices in the papal chapel.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    J. Shearman, ‘The Florentine Entrata of Leo X, 1515’, JWCI, xxxviii(1975), 153, n.60.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    See, for example, J. M. Llorens, ‘Juan Escribano, cantor pontificio y compositor (d. 1557)’, AnM, xii (1957), 108.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    Iain Fenlon quotes this passage of a letter from 1578 in his Music and Patronage in Sixteenth-Century Mantua (Cambridge, 1980), i, 91Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    G. Martin, Roma sancta (1581), 96.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    T. Culley, Jesuits and Music (Rome, 1970), 76.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Roma sancta (1581), 88; for another example, see Llorens, ‘Juan Escribano’, 108.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    See C. Reynolds, ‘Early Renaissance Organs at San Pietro in Vaticano’, Studi musicali, xv (1986), 42, n.10.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Gmelin, ‘Die Romreise des Salemer Conventuals and späteren Abtes, Matthäus Rot, 1554’, Zeitschrift fir die Geschichte des Oberrheins, xxxii (1880), 234–73. The relevant passage (p.252) reads, ‘24 Mar., quod erat sabbatum Pasce, fui mane in sacello pontificis, ubi officio post nonas completo et cantanto (!) in missa Gloria in excelsis deo incipiebatur Et in terra simul mit der music, trumeetten, büchsen und glogge’. The next day intonerunt campane, bombarde, et buccine’.Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    Neils Krogh Rasmussen discusses this engraving at length, in Maiestas Pontificia: Liturgical Reading of Etienne Dupérac’s Engraving of the Capella Sixtina from 1578’, Analecta Romana Instituti Danici, xii(1983) 109–48. I would like to thank Professor Sherr for calling my attention to this study.Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    A. Pirro, ‘Leo X and Music’, MQ, xxi (1935), 8.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    David Fallows examines this and several other instances of ‘secundus puer’ in ‘The Performing Ensembles in Josquin’s Sacred Music’, TVNM, xxxv(1985), 44–6.Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    Anne-Marie Braggard finds no evidence of a private papal chapel in these years; ‘Détails nouveaux sur les musiciens de la cour du Pape Clément VII’, RBM, xii(1958), 12–18. After several payments for boys’ clothes, there are no further references to them in the account books. This does not necessarily indicate that they left Rome or even papal service (as Braggard presumes; p.15), since they would have been under the care of a singer in any case. As a rule there were also no payments to the boys during Leo’s papacy.Google Scholar
  28. 26.
    G. Dickinson, Du Bellay in Rome (Leiden, 1960), 90.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    L. Lockwood, ‘Jean Mouton and Jean Michel: New Evidence on French Music and Musicians in Italy, 1505–1520’, JAMS, xxxii (1979), 222.Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    Florence Gabel translated this section from Book VIII of the Commentaries (Northampton, Mass., 1951), 551–5. Régarding a similar scene in Rome during the time of Julius IIGoogle Scholar
  31. see L. Partridge and R. Starn, A Renaissance Likeness: Art and Culture in Raphael’s Julius II’ (Berkeley, 1980), 57.Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    There is an extended translation in N. Pirrotta and E. Povoledo, Music and Theatre from Poliziano to Monteverdi, trans. K. Eales (Cambridge, 1982), 36.Google Scholar
  33. 30.
    Claude Palisca quotes the letter in Humanism in Italian Renaissance Musical Thought (New Haven, 1985), 119–20.Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    Karol Berger discusses the disputation between Danckerts and Vicentino in Chapter 1 of Theories of Chromatic and Enharmonic Music in late 16th Century Italy (Ann Arbor, 1980).Google Scholar
  35. 38.
    K. Weil-Garris and J. D’Amico, ‘The Renaissance Cardinal’s Ideal Palace: a Chapter from Cortese’s De cardinalatu’ in Studies in Italian Art and Architecture 15th through 18th Centuries, ed. H. Millon (Rome, 1980), 49. D’Amico further evaluates Cortese’s treatise in Renaissance Humanism, especially 227–37.Google Scholar
  36. 46.
    J Haar, ‘ TheMadrigale Arioso: a Mid-Century Development in the Cinquecento Madrigal’, Studi musicali, xii(1983),203–19.Google Scholar
  37. 47.
    G. Reese, Music in the Renaissance (New York, 1954, rev. 2/1959), 125, n.154.Google Scholar
  38. 50.
    Albert Dunning notes the scarcity of political motets from Rome, especially after the papacy of Leo X, in Die Staatsmotette, 1480–1555 (Utrecht, 1970), 234–5. For the early fifteenth century Reinhard Strohm notes that ‘very little Mass music of the period can be related definitely to the chapel of Eugene IV, or to the papacy at all’, in ‘European Politics and the Distribution of Music in the Early Fifteenth Century’, EMH, i (1981)319.Google Scholar
  39. 51.
    For further details and bibliography, see L.D. Ettlinger, ‘Pollaiuolo’s Tomb of Pope Sixtus IV’, JWCI, xvi (1953), 266.Google Scholar
  40. 52.
    J. O’Malley, Praise and Blame in Renaissance Rome (Durham, North Carolina, 1979), 33–5.Google Scholar
  41. 53.
    S. J. Freedberg, Painting of the High Renaissance (New York, 1972), i, 114–15.Google Scholar
  42. 54.
    C. Reynolds, ‘The Origins of San Pietro B 80 and the Development of a Roman Sacred Repertory’, EMH,i (1981) 284–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 55.
    J.-A. Reif, ‘Music and Grammar: Imitation and Analogy in Morales’, EMH, vi (1986), 240–41.Google Scholar
  44. 57.
    Richard Sherr makes a persuasive case for this musical stemma and also additional number symbolism in ‘The Medici Coat of Arms in a Motet for Leo X’, EM,xv (1987), 31–5.Google Scholar
  45. 59.
    Stinger, The Renaissance in Rome, 55–6; and M. Perry, ‘ “Candor Illaesus”: the “Impressa” of Clement VII and other Medici Devices in the Vatican Stanze’, Burlington Magazine,cxix (Oct 1977), 676–86, especially 683.Google Scholar
  46. 60.
    Partridge and Starn, A Renaissance Likeness 56–7; and J. O’Malley, ‘Man’s Dignity, God’s Love, and the Destiny of Rome: a Text of Giles of Viterbo’, Viator, iii (1972), 389–416, especially 411–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 61.
    Stinger, The Renaissance in Rome, 218.Google Scholar
  48. 62.
    E. Lowinsky, ‘A Newly Discovered Sixteenth-Century Motet Manuscript at the Biblioteca Vallicelliana in Rome’, JAMS, iii (1950), 174–6 and 201–2.Google Scholar
  49. 63.
    A full text of the ‘Canon on Music to be used in the Mass’ is printed, among other places, in Lewis Lockwood’s edition of the Pope Marcellus Mass (New York, 1975), 19.Google Scholar
  50. 64.
    These have been reviewed by D. Zager, The Polyphonic Latin Hymns of Orlando di Lasso: a Liturgical and Repertorial Study (diss., U. of Minnesota, 1985).Google Scholar
  51. 65.
    Regarding music at the two Jesuit colleges, see T. Culley, Jesuits and Music (Rome, 1970);and his ‘Musical Activity in Some Sixteenth Century Jesuit Colleges, with Special Reference to the Venerable English College in Rome from 1579 to 1589’, AnMc, no. 19 (1979), 1–29.Google Scholar
  52. See also the first chapter of J. Roche, North Italian Church Music in the Age of Monteverdi (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
  53. 68.
    Lewis Lockwood comments on the ‘close connection’ between the concerns of humanists and church reformers in this regard in The Counter-Reformation and the Masses of Vincenzo Ruffo (Venice, [1970]), 129–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Reynolds

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations