Advertisement

Introduction: The Centrality of Science and Technology

  • Ian Varcoe
  • Steven Yearley
Part of the Explorations in Sociology book series (EIS)

Abstract

The claim that science and technology are now more centrally placed in society and culture is a difficult one to justify. In one sense, to comment in this manner is merely to draw attention to a development which is so obvious as not to require comment. Technological innovation, driven principally by profit-seeking, is a central feature of advanced industrial societies — not to speak of the constant drive to improve weaponry in a world of seemingly endlessly frozen super-power rivalry, if not outright conflict. So much is this so that drawing attention to its increasingly ramified and sophisticated nature is to state a condition of modern existence, and a thoroughly familiar feature of contemporary experience, rather than to suggest that current social change has distinctive features with determinate properties worth delineating as such. On the other hand, to make this second claim — as the editors of this collection wish to do — presents problems of definition of its own. Are the special features of recent changes in the position of science and technology in the advanced societies genuine? Can they be described apart from the indicators suggested by the papers in this volume? The subjects discussed here are indeed part of the change in the status of science and technology suggested, but the changes can, in part, be independently described.

Keywords

Advanced Society Institutional Life Visual Display Terminal Advanced Industrial Society Rival Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BELL, D. (1974) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  2. BELL, D. (1979) The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, 2nd. ed. (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  3. BRAVERMAN, H. (1974) Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (New York: Monthly Review Press).Google Scholar
  4. COLLINS, H. (1981) ‘The “Core-Set” in Modern Science: Social Contingency with Methodological Propriety in Science’, History of Science, 19, pp. 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. HABERMAS, J. (1962) Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (Neuwied: Luchterhand).Google Scholar
  6. HABERMAS, J. (1971a) ‘Technology and Science as “Ideology”’, in J. Habermas, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, trans. J. J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  7. HABERMAS, J. (1971b) Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, trans. J. J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  8. HABERMAS, J. (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. J. J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  9. HABERMAS, J. (1976) Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  10. HABERMAS, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  11. KUHN, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  12. MULKAY, M. (1979) Science and the Sociology of Knowledge (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  13. POLANYI, K. (1957) The Great Transformation, Revised ed. (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
  14. PRICE, D. J. DE SOLLA (1963) Little Science, Big Science (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  15. SUPPE, F. (ed.) (1977) The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd. ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
  16. WEBER, M. (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  17. WINCH, P. (1958) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  18. YEARLEY, S. (1988) Science, Technology and Social Change (London: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Varcoe
  • Steven Yearley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations